Why Can Large Language Models Generate Correct Chain-of-Thoughts?
2310.13571
0
0
💬
Abstract
This paper delves into the capabilities of large language models (LLMs), specifically focusing on advancing the theoretical comprehension of chain-of-thought prompting. We investigate how LLMs can be effectively induced to generate a coherent chain of thoughts. To achieve this, we introduce a two-level hierarchical graphical model tailored for natural language generation. Within this framework, we establish a compelling geometrical convergence rate that gauges the likelihood of an LLM-generated chain of thoughts compared to those originating from the true language. Our findings provide a theoretical justification for the ability of LLMs to produce the correct sequence of thoughts (potentially) explaining performance gains in tasks demanding reasoning skills.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how large language models (LLMs) can effectively generate a coherent chain of thoughts, which is important for tasks requiring reasoning skills.
- The researchers introduce a two-level hierarchical graphical model to capture the generation of natural language and establish a theoretical convergence rate for the likelihood of an LLM-generated chain of thoughts compared to the true language.
- The findings provide a theoretical justification for the ability of LLMs to produce the correct sequence of thoughts, potentially explaining their performance gains in reasoning-based tasks.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how large language models (LLMs) can be made to generate a series of connected thoughts or ideas, rather than just individual sentences. This is important because many real-world tasks, like problem-solving or decision-making, require the ability to reason through a sequence of steps.
The researchers developed a special type of mathematical model, called a "two-level hierarchical graphical model," that can better capture how natural language is generated, including the relationships between different ideas. This model allows them to study the likelihood that an LLM will produce a chain of thoughts that is similar to what a human would generate.
The key finding is that the researchers were able to establish a strong "convergence rate" for these LLM-generated chains of thoughts. This means they can predict, with a high degree of confidence, how likely it is that an LLM will produce a coherent sequence of ideas that matches what a person would come up with. This provides a solid theoretical foundation for understanding why LLMs may perform well on tasks that require reasoning and logical thinking.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a two-level hierarchical graphical model tailored for natural language generation to investigate how large language models (LLMs) can be effectively induced to generate a coherent chain of thoughts.
Within this framework, the researchers establish a compelling geometrical convergence rate that gauges the likelihood of an LLM-generated chain of thoughts compared to those originating from the true language. This provides a theoretical justification for the ability of LLMs to produce the correct sequence of thoughts, potentially explaining performance gains in tasks demanding reasoning skills.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a robust theoretical foundation for understanding how LLMs can generate coherent chains of thoughts, which is an important capability for tasks requiring logical reasoning. However, the researchers acknowledge that their model makes several simplifying assumptions, such as the independence of individual thoughts within a chain.
Additionally, the paper does not directly evaluate the performance of LLMs on real-world reasoning tasks, nor does it compare their approach to other methods for enhancing the reasoning abilities of language models. Further empirical studies would be needed to fully validate the practical implications of the theoretical insights presented in this work.
Conclusion
This paper offers a significant contribution to the understanding of how large language models can be effectively leveraged to generate coherent sequences of thoughts, which is crucial for tasks demanding reasoning and problem-solving skills. The researchers' theoretical framework and convergence rate analysis provide a solid foundation for further research and development in this area, with potential applications in augmenting LLMs and improving their step-by-step reasoning capabilities.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
General Purpose Verification for Chain of Thought Prompting
Robert Vacareanu, Anurag Pratik, Evangelia Spiliopoulou, Zheng Qi, Giovanni Paolini, Neha Anna John, Jie Ma, Yassine Benajiba, Miguel Ballesteros
0
0
Many of the recent capabilities demonstrated by Large Language Models (LLMs) arise primarily from their ability to exploit contextual information. In this paper, we explore ways to improve reasoning capabilities of LLMs through (1) exploration of different chains of thought and (2) validation of the individual steps of the reasoning process. We propose three general principles that a model should adhere to while reasoning: (i) Relevance, (ii) Mathematical Accuracy, and (iii) Logical Consistency. We apply these constraints to the reasoning steps generated by the LLM to improve the accuracy of the final generation. The constraints are applied in the form of verifiers: the model itself is asked to verify if the generated steps satisfy each constraint. To further steer the generations towards high-quality solutions, we use the perplexity of the reasoning steps as an additional verifier. We evaluate our method on 4 distinct types of reasoning tasks, spanning a total of 9 different datasets. Experiments show that our method is always better than vanilla generation, and, in 6 out of the 9 datasets, it is better than best-of N sampling which samples N reasoning chains and picks the lowest perplexity generation.
5/2/2024
Demystifying Chains, Trees, and Graphs of Thoughts
Maciej Besta, Florim Memedi, Zhenyu Zhang, Robert Gerstenberger, Guangyuan Piao, Nils Blach, Piotr Nyczyk, Marcin Copik, Grzegorz Kwa'sniewski, Jurgen Muller, Lukas Gianinazzi, Ales Kubicek, Hubert Niewiadomski, Aidan O'Mahony, Onur Mutlu, Torsten Hoefler
0
0
The field of natural language processing (NLP) has witnessed significant progress in recent years, with a notable focus on improving large language models' (LLM) performance through innovative prompting techniques. Among these, prompt engineering coupled with structures has emerged as a promising paradigm, with designs such as Chain-of-Thought, Tree of Thoughts, or Graph of Thoughts, in which the overall LLM reasoning is guided by a structure such as a graph. As illustrated with numerous examples, this paradigm significantly enhances the LLM's capability to solve numerous tasks, ranging from logical or mathematical reasoning to planning or creative writing. To facilitate the understanding of this growing field and pave the way for future developments, we devise a general blueprint for effective and efficient LLM reasoning schemes. For this, we conduct an in-depth analysis of the prompt execution pipeline, clarifying and clearly defining different concepts. We then build the first taxonomy of structure-enhanced LLM reasoning schemes. We focus on identifying fundamental classes of harnessed structures, and we analyze the representations of these structures, algorithms executed with these structures, and many others. We refer to these structures as reasoning topologies, because their representation becomes to a degree spatial, as they are contained within the LLM context. Our study compares existing prompting schemes using the proposed taxonomy, discussing how certain design choices lead to different patterns in performance and cost. We also outline theoretical underpinnings, relationships between prompting and other parts of the LLM ecosystem such as knowledge bases, and the associated research challenges. Our work will help to advance future prompt engineering techniques.
4/8/2024
🔍
Algorithm of Thoughts: Enhancing Exploration of Ideas in Large Language Models
Bilgehan Sel, Ahmad Al-Tawaha, Vanshaj Khattar, Ruoxi Jia, Ming Jin
0
0
Current literature, aiming to surpass the Chain-of-Thought approach, often resorts to external modi operandi involving halting, modifying, and then resuming the generation process to boost Large Language Models' (LLMs) reasoning capacities. Due to their myopic perspective, they escalate the number of query requests, leading to increased costs, memory, and computational overheads. Addressing this, we propose the Algorithm of Thoughts -- a novel strategy that propels LLMs through algorithmic reasoning pathways. By employing algorithmic examples fully in-context, this overarching view of the whole process exploits the innate recurrence dynamics of LLMs, expanding their idea exploration with merely one or a few queries. Our technique outperforms earlier single-query methods and even more recent multi-query strategies that employ an extensive tree search algorithms while using significantly fewer tokens. Intriguingly, our results suggest that instructing an LLM using an algorithm can lead to performance surpassing that of the algorithm itself, hinting at LLM's inherent ability to weave its intuition into optimized searches. We probe into the underpinnings of our method's efficacy and its nuances in application. The code and related content can be found in: https://algorithm-of-thoughts.github.io.
6/4/2024
Can Small Language Models Help Large Language Models Reason Better?: LM-Guided Chain-of-Thought
Jooyoung Lee, Fan Yang, Thanh Tran, Qian Hu, Emre Barut, Kai-Wei Chang, Chengwei Su
0
0
We introduce a novel framework, LM-Guided CoT, that leverages a lightweight (i.e., 10B) LM in reasoning tasks. Specifically, the lightweight LM first generates a rationale for each input instance. The Frozen large LM is then prompted to predict a task output based on the rationale generated by the lightweight LM. Our approach is resource-efficient in the sense that it only requires training the lightweight LM. We optimize the model through 1) knowledge distillation and 2) reinforcement learning from rationale-oriented and task-oriented reward signals. We assess our method with multi-hop extractive question answering (QA) benchmarks, HotpotQA, and 2WikiMultiHopQA. Experimental results show that our approach outperforms all baselines regarding answer prediction accuracy. We also find that reinforcement learning helps the model to produce higher-quality rationales with improved QA performance.
4/5/2024