Algorithmic Persuasion Through Simulation

Read original: arXiv:2311.18138 - Published 6/12/2024 by Keegan Harris, Nicole Immorlica, Brendan Lucier, Aleksandrs Slivkins

🧪

Overview

This paper studies a Bayesian persuasion problem, where a sender (e.g., a company) wants to persuade a receiver (e.g., a customer) to take a binary action, such as purchasing a product.
The sender has information about the (binary) state of the world, such as the product's quality, but only limited information about the receiver's beliefs and utilities.
The sender can learn more about the receiver by querying an oracle that simulates the receiver's behavior, motivated by customer surveys, user studies, and advances in generative AI.
The paper characterizes the sender's optimal messaging policy given any distribution over receiver types and designs a polynomial-time querying algorithm to optimize the sender's expected utility.
The paper also considers approximate oracles, more general query structures, and costly queries.

Plain English Explanation

In this research, the authors look at a situation where a company wants to persuade a customer to make a particular decision, like buying a product. The company knows some information about the product, like whether the quality is high or low, but doesn't have a full understanding of what the customer believes or values.

To learn more about the customer, the company can ask an AI system some questions, similar to how a business might conduct customer surveys or user studies. After a certain number of questions, the company decides on a message to send to the customer, and the customer then makes their decision based on that message.

The researchers figure out the best message for the company to send, given what they know about the customer. They also design a fast algorithm that the company can use to decide which questions to ask the AI system in order to get the most helpful information.

The paper also considers cases where the AI system the company asks questions of isn't fully accurate, or where asking questions has a cost for the company.

Technical Explanation

The paper studies a Bayesian persuasion problem, where a sender (e.g., a company) wants to persuade a receiver (e.g., a customer) to take a binary action, such as purchasing a product. The sender is informed about the (binary) state of the world, such as the quality of the product, but only has limited information about the receiver's beliefs and utilities.

To learn more about the receiver, the sender can query an oracle that simulates the receiver's behavior. This is motivated by customer surveys, user studies, and advances in generative AI. After a fixed number of queries, the sender commits to a messaging policy and the receiver takes the action that maximizes their expected utility given the message they receive.

The paper characterizes the sender's optimal messaging policy given any distribution over receiver types. It then designs a polynomial-time querying algorithm that optimizes the sender's expected utility in this Bayesian persuasion game. The authors also consider approximate oracles, more general query structures, and costly queries.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes some important assumptions, such as the binary nature of the state of the world and the receiver's action. In real-world scenarios, these may be more complex. Additionally, the use of an oracle to simulate the receiver's behavior, while motivated by practical applications, may not fully capture the nuances of human decision-making.

The paper also does not address potential ethical concerns around using AI and data-driven techniques to manipulate consumer behavior. While the research is technically sound, further discussion of the societal implications would be valuable.

Finally, the paper focuses on optimizing the sender's expected utility, but does not consider the receiver's welfare or the overall social impact of the persuasion process. Future research could explore ways to align the sender's and receiver's interests, or to ensure that the persuasion process leads to beneficial outcomes for all stakeholders.

Conclusion

This paper presents an interesting and technically-sound approach to a Bayesian persuasion problem, where a sender can learn about a receiver's preferences and use that information to craft an optimal messaging policy. The research has practical applications in areas like marketing and product design, and the algorithmic contributions could be useful in a variety of persuasion and decision-making scenarios.

However, the paper also raises important questions about the ethical implications of using data-driven techniques to influence consumer behavior. As the field of Bayesian persuasion continues to evolve, it will be crucial to consider the broader societal impact of these techniques and to ensure that they are deployed in a responsible and beneficial manner.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🧪

Algorithmic Persuasion Through Simulation

Keegan Harris, Nicole Immorlica, Brendan Lucier, Aleksandrs Slivkins

We study a Bayesian persuasion game where a sender wants to persuade a receiver to take a binary action, such as purchasing a product. The sender is informed about the (binary) state of the world, such as whether the quality of the product is high or low, but only has limited information about the receiver's beliefs and utilities. Motivated by customer surveys, user studies, and recent advances in AI, we allow the sender to learn more about the receiver by querying an oracle that simulates the receiver's behavior. After a fixed number of queries, the sender commits to a messaging policy and the receiver takes the action that maximizes her expected utility given the message she receives. We characterize the sender's optimal messaging policy given any distribution over receiver types. We then design a polynomial-time querying algorithm that optimizes the sender's expected utility in this game. We also consider approximate oracles, more general query structures, and costly queries.

6/12/2024

🤔

Multi-Sender Persuasion: A Computational Perspective

Safwan Hossain, Tonghan Wang, Tao Lin, Yiling Chen, David C. Parkes, Haifeng Xu

We consider the multi-sender persuasion problem: multiple players with informational advantage signal to convince a single self-interested actor to take certain actions. This problem generalizes the seminal Bayesian Persuasion framework and is ubiquitous in computational economics, multi-agent learning, and multi-objective machine learning. The core solution concept here is the Nash equilibrium of senders' signaling policies. Theoretically, we prove that finding an equilibrium in general is PPAD-Hard; in fact, even computing a sender's best response is NP-Hard. Given these intrinsic difficulties, we turn to finding local Nash equilibria. We propose a novel differentiable neural network to approximate this game's non-linear and discontinuous utilities. Complementing this with the extra-gradient algorithm, we discover local equilibria that Pareto dominates full-revelation equilibria and those found by existing neural networks. Broadly, our theoretical and empirical contributions are of interest to a large class of economic problems.

6/21/2024

👨‍🏫

Learning to Persuade on the Fly: Robustness Against Ignorance

You Zu, Krishnamurthy Iyer, Haifeng Xu

Motivated by information sharing in online platforms, we study repeated persuasion between a sender and a stream of receivers where at each time, the sender observes a payoff-relevant state drawn independently and identically from an unknown distribution, and shares state information with the receivers who each choose an action. The sender seeks to persuade the receivers into taking actions aligned with the sender's preference by selectively sharing state information. However, in contrast to the standard models, neither the sender nor the receivers know the distribution, and the sender has to persuade while learning the distribution on the fly. We study the sender's learning problem of making persuasive action recommendations to achieve low regret against the optimal persuasion mechanism with the knowledge of the distribution. To do this, we first propose and motivate a persuasiveness criterion for the unknown distribution setting that centers robustness as a requirement in the face of uncertainty. Our main result is an algorithm that, with high probability, is robustly-persuasive and achieves $O(sqrt{Tlog T})$ regret, where $T$ is the horizon length. Intuitively, at each time our algorithm maintains a set of candidate distributions, and chooses a signaling mechanism that is simultaneously persuasive for all of them. Core to our proof is a tight analysis about the cost of robust persuasion, which may be of independent interest. We further prove that this regret order is optimal (up to logarithmic terms) by showing that no algorithm can achieve regret better than $Omega(sqrt{T})$.

5/6/2024

📉

When and Why is Persuasion Hard? A Computational Complexity Result

Zachary Wojtowicz

As generative foundation models improve, they also tend to become more persuasive, raising concerns that AI automation will enable governments, firms, and other actors to manipulate beliefs with unprecedented scale and effectiveness at virtually no cost. The full economic and social ramifications of this trend have been difficult to foresee, however, given that we currently lack a complete theoretical understanding of why persuasion is costly for human labor to produce in the first place. This paper places human and AI agents on a common conceptual footing by formalizing informational persuasion as a mathematical decision problem and characterizing its computational complexity. A novel proof establishes that persuasive messages are challenging to discover (NP-Hard) but easy to adopt if supplied by others (NP). This asymmetry helps explain why people are susceptible to persuasion, even in contexts where all relevant information is publicly available. The result also illuminates why litigation, strategic communication, and other persuasion-oriented activities have historically been so human capital intensive, and it provides a new theoretical basis for studying how AI will impact various industries.

8/16/2024