Multi-Sender Persuasion: A Computational Perspective

Overview

• This paper examines the "multi-sender persuasion problem," where multiple players with informational advantages attempt to influence a single self-interested actor to take certain actions.
• The core solution concept is the Nash equilibrium of the senders' signaling policies.
• The researchers prove that finding an equilibrium in this general problem is PPAD-Hard, and even computing a sender's best response is NP-Hard.
• Given these challenges, the researchers focus on finding local Nash equilibria using a novel differentiable neural network approach.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores a scenario where several parties, each with some special information, try to convince a single decision-maker to take a particular course of action. This is a generalization of the Bayesian Persuasion framework and is common in areas like computational economics, multi-agent learning, and machine learning with multiple objectives.

The key concept is the "Nash equilibrium" - a set of strategies where no player can improve their outcome by changing their own strategy, given the strategies of the other players. The researchers show that finding this equilibrium is an extremely difficult problem in general, both theoretically and computationally.

To address this, the researchers develop a novel neural network approach to approximate the non-linear and discontinuous utilities in this game. They then use a specialized algorithm called "extra-gradient" to discover local equilibria that are better for the players than the equilibria found by previous methods or the fully transparent "full-revelation" equilibrium.

Technical Explanation

The paper formalizes the "multi-sender persuasion problem," where multiple informed players (the "senders") try to influence the actions of a single self-interested decision-maker (the "receiver"). The core solution concept is the Nash equilibrium of the senders' signaling policies.

Theoretically, the researchers prove that finding an equilibrium in this general problem is PPAD-Hard, and that even computing a single sender's best response is NP-Hard. These intractability results motivate the researchers to focus on finding local Nash equilibria instead of global ones.

To do this, the researchers propose a novel differentiable neural network architecture to approximate the non-linear and discontinuous utility functions in this persuasion game. They then leverage the "extra-gradient" algorithm, which is well-suited for finding solutions to games with non-convex payoffs. Using this approach, the researchers are able to discover local equilibria that Pareto-dominate both the full-revelation equilibrium and those found by simpler neural network models.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge the fundamental computational hardness of the multi-sender persuasion problem, which limits the scope of their findings. While the local equilibria discovered by their neural network approach are an improvement over previous methods, it is unclear how close these solutions are to the true global optimum.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the real-world implications or potential societal impacts of these multi-sender persuasion mechanisms. There may be concerns around the manipulation of decision-makers or the amplification of information asymmetries that warrant further investigation.

Finally, the researchers do not compare their approach to other techniques for finding equilibria in non-convex games, such as opponent modeling or meta-learning. Exploring a wider range of algorithmic approaches could lead to additional insights.

Conclusion

This paper makes important theoretical and empirical contributions to the study of multi-sender persuasion problems, which are ubiquitous in fields like computational economics and multi-agent learning. By developing a novel neural network approach and leveraging the extra-gradient algorithm, the researchers are able to find local Nash equilibria that improve upon previous methods.

While the fundamental computational challenges of this problem remain, the researchers' work advances our understanding of how multiple informed parties can strategically signal to a single decision-maker. This has implications for a wide range of real-world scenarios, from political lobbying to product marketing, and warrants further investigation into the societal impacts of these persuasion mechanisms.