Learning to Persuade on the Fly: Robustness Against Ignorance

Read original: arXiv:2102.10156 - Published 5/6/2024 by You Zu, Krishnamurthy Iyer, Haifeng Xu

👨‍🏫

Overview

This paper examines a scenario where a sender repeatedly shares information with a stream of receivers in order to persuade them to take actions aligned with the sender's preferences.
Unlike standard models, neither the sender nor the receivers know the underlying distribution of the payoff-relevant state, so the sender must learn this distribution while also trying to persuade the receivers.
The key challenge is developing an algorithm that can achieve low regret compared to the optimal persuasion mechanism, which requires knowing the distribution.

Plain English Explanation

In this paper, the researchers look at a situation where someone (the "sender") wants to repeatedly share information with a series of people (the "receivers") in order to convince them to take actions that benefit the sender.

The twist is that neither the sender nor the receivers know the true underlying distribution of the information being shared. The sender has to figure out what this distribution is at the same time as they are trying to persuade the receivers.

The main goal is to create an algorithm that allows the sender to do a good job of persuading the receivers, even without knowing the distribution ahead of time. The researchers want this algorithm to have "low regret," meaning it should perform close to the best possible persuasion strategy that would be available if the distribution was known.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes and analyzes an algorithm for the sender to use in this setting. The key idea is that the algorithm maintains a set of candidate distributions that could plausibly match the true underlying distribution. At each time, the algorithm chooses a signaling mechanism that is simultaneously persuasive for all of these candidate distributions.

The main result is that this algorithm achieves O(√Tlog T) regret, where T is the total number of interactions between the sender and receivers. The researchers also prove that this regret bound is optimal up to logarithmic factors, by showing that no algorithm can do better than Ω(√T) regret.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes some important assumptions, such as the payoff-relevant state being drawn independently and identically at each time. It would be interesting to see how the results extend to more complex or realistic scenarios, such as state dynamics that exhibit smoothness or structure.

Additionally, the regret analysis focuses on the asymptotic behavior as the time horizon T grows large. It could be valuable to better understand the constants and dependencies on problem parameters, to assess the practical feasibility of the approach.

Overall, this work provides a solid theoretical foundation for understanding the challenges of persuasion under uncertainty, and introduces an algorithm with strong performance guarantees. Further research building on these insights could yield important practical implications.

Conclusion

This paper studies a novel setting where a sender must persuade a stream of receivers while simultaneously learning the underlying distribution of the information being shared. The researchers propose an algorithm that achieves near-optimal regret, providing a strong theoretical guarantee on its performance.

The work highlights the challenges of making decisions under uncertainty, and demonstrates that careful algorithm design can lead to robust and effective persuasion strategies even in the absence of complete information. These insights could have applications in a variety of real-world scenarios involving information sharing and strategic decision-making.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

👨‍🏫

Learning to Persuade on the Fly: Robustness Against Ignorance

You Zu, Krishnamurthy Iyer, Haifeng Xu

Motivated by information sharing in online platforms, we study repeated persuasion between a sender and a stream of receivers where at each time, the sender observes a payoff-relevant state drawn independently and identically from an unknown distribution, and shares state information with the receivers who each choose an action. The sender seeks to persuade the receivers into taking actions aligned with the sender's preference by selectively sharing state information. However, in contrast to the standard models, neither the sender nor the receivers know the distribution, and the sender has to persuade while learning the distribution on the fly. We study the sender's learning problem of making persuasive action recommendations to achieve low regret against the optimal persuasion mechanism with the knowledge of the distribution. To do this, we first propose and motivate a persuasiveness criterion for the unknown distribution setting that centers robustness as a requirement in the face of uncertainty. Our main result is an algorithm that, with high probability, is robustly-persuasive and achieves $O(sqrt{Tlog T})$ regret, where $T$ is the horizon length. Intuitively, at each time our algorithm maintains a set of candidate distributions, and chooses a signaling mechanism that is simultaneously persuasive for all of them. Core to our proof is a tight analysis about the cost of robust persuasion, which may be of independent interest. We further prove that this regret order is optimal (up to logarithmic terms) by showing that no algorithm can achieve regret better than $Omega(sqrt{T})$.

5/6/2024

🧪

Algorithmic Persuasion Through Simulation

Keegan Harris, Nicole Immorlica, Brendan Lucier, Aleksandrs Slivkins

We study a Bayesian persuasion game where a sender wants to persuade a receiver to take a binary action, such as purchasing a product. The sender is informed about the (binary) state of the world, such as whether the quality of the product is high or low, but only has limited information about the receiver's beliefs and utilities. Motivated by customer surveys, user studies, and recent advances in AI, we allow the sender to learn more about the receiver by querying an oracle that simulates the receiver's behavior. After a fixed number of queries, the sender commits to a messaging policy and the receiver takes the action that maximizes her expected utility given the message she receives. We characterize the sender's optimal messaging policy given any distribution over receiver types. We then design a polynomial-time querying algorithm that optimizes the sender's expected utility in this game. We also consider approximate oracles, more general query structures, and costly queries.

6/12/2024

🗣️

Constrained Online Two-stage Stochastic Optimization: Near Optimal Algorithms via Adversarial Learning

Jiashuo Jiang

We consider an online two-stage stochastic optimization with long-term constraints over a finite horizon of $T$ periods. At each period, we take the first-stage action, observe a model parameter realization and then take the second-stage action from a feasible set that depends both on the first-stage decision and the model parameter. We aim to minimize the cumulative objective value while guaranteeing that the long-term average second-stage decision belongs to a set. We develop online algorithms for the online two-stage problem from adversarial learning algorithms. Also, the regret bound of our algorithm cam be reduced to the regret bound of embedded adversarial learning algorithms. Based on our framework, we obtain new results under various settings. When the model parameter at each period is drawn from identical distributions, we derive textit{state-of-art} $O(sqrt{T})$ regret that improves previous bounds under special cases. Our algorithm is also robust to adversarial corruptions of model parameter realizations. When the model parameters are drawn from unknown non-stationary distributions and we are given machine-learned predictions of the distributions, we develop a new algorithm from our framework with a regret $O(W_T+sqrt{T})$, where $W_T$ measures the total inaccuracy of the machine-learned predictions.

5/21/2024

🤔

Multi-Sender Persuasion: A Computational Perspective

Safwan Hossain, Tonghan Wang, Tao Lin, Yiling Chen, David C. Parkes, Haifeng Xu

We consider the multi-sender persuasion problem: multiple players with informational advantage signal to convince a single self-interested actor to take certain actions. This problem generalizes the seminal Bayesian Persuasion framework and is ubiquitous in computational economics, multi-agent learning, and multi-objective machine learning. The core solution concept here is the Nash equilibrium of senders' signaling policies. Theoretically, we prove that finding an equilibrium in general is PPAD-Hard; in fact, even computing a sender's best response is NP-Hard. Given these intrinsic difficulties, we turn to finding local Nash equilibria. We propose a novel differentiable neural network to approximate this game's non-linear and discontinuous utilities. Complementing this with the extra-gradient algorithm, we discover local equilibria that Pareto dominates full-revelation equilibria and those found by existing neural networks. Broadly, our theoretical and empirical contributions are of interest to a large class of economic problems.

6/21/2024