Aliasing and Label-Independent Decomposition of Risk: Beyond the bias-variance trade-off
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Explores a new perspective on the bias-variance tradeoff in machine learning models
- Proposes a label-independent decomposition of risk that goes beyond the traditional bias-variance framework
- Introduces the concept of "aliasing" to capture the mismatch between the model and the true underlying function
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new way of thinking about the performance of machine learning models, moving beyond the traditional bias-variance tradeoff.
The authors introduce the concept of "aliasing" - the mismatch between the model's representation and the true underlying function that generates the data. This aliasing can occur even when the model has low bias and variance, and can have a significant impact on the model's risk or error.
The paper proposes a label-independent decomposition of risk that takes this aliasing into account. This means the model's performance can be analyzed without relying on the specific labels or target values, providing a more fundamental understanding of the model's capabilities.
By considering aliasing in addition to bias and variance, the authors argue that we can gain deeper insights into the strengths and limitations of machine learning models. This could lead to the development of more robust and effective models that better capture the true underlying relationships in the data.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by introducing the concept of aliasing - the mismatch between the model's representation and the true underlying function that generates the data. This aliasing can occur even when the model has low bias and variance, and can have a significant impact on the model's risk or error.
The authors then propose a label-independent decomposition of risk that takes this aliasing into account. This decomposition allows the model's performance to be analyzed without relying on the specific labels or target values, providing a more fundamental understanding of the model's capabilities.
The paper also discusses the relationship between interpretability and generalization, suggesting that the traditional bias-variance tradeoff may not fully capture the nuances of a model's behavior. By considering aliasing, the authors argue that we can gain deeper insights into the strengths and limitations of machine learning models.
The proposed risk decomposition is further explored through experiments and analysis, highlighting its potential benefits in understanding and quantifying predictive uncertainty.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and compelling perspective on the performance of machine learning models, challenging the traditional bias-variance framework. The concept of aliasing is a valuable addition to the field, as it can help explain model behavior that may not be fully captured by the classic bias-variance tradeoff.
One potential limitation of the research is the reliance on specific mathematical formulations and decompositions, which may not always be intuitive or easy to apply in practice. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that further work is needed to make the concepts more accessible and applicable to a wider range of machine learning problems.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the practical implications of the proposed risk decomposition or how it might be used to inform model design and development. More research is needed to explore the real-world applications and potential impact of this approach.
Conclusion
This paper offers a fresh perspective on the fundamental challenges in machine learning, moving beyond the traditional bias-variance tradeoff. By introducing the concept of aliasing and proposing a label-independent decomposition of risk, the authors provide a more nuanced understanding of model performance.
The insights gained from this research could lead to the development of more robust and effective machine learning models, better able to capture the true underlying relationships in complex data. As the field continues to evolve, approaches like the one presented in this paper may become increasingly important for pushing the boundaries of what is possible with machine learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Aliasing and Label-Independent Decomposition of Risk: Beyond the bias-variance trade-off
Mark K. Transtrum, Gus L. W. Hart, Tyler J. Jarvis, Jared P. Whitehead
A central problem in data science is to use potentially noisy samples of an unknown function to predict function values for unseen inputs. In classical statistics, the predictive error is understood as a trade-off between the bias and the variance that balances model simplicity with its ability to fit complex functions. However, over-parameterized models exhibit counter-intuitive behaviors, such as double descent in which models of increasing complexity exhibit decreasing generalization error. We introduce an alternative paradigm called the generalized aliasing decomposition. We explain the asymptotically small error of complex models as a systematic de-aliasing that occurs in the over-parameterized regime. In the limit of large models, the contribution due to aliasing vanishes, leaving an expression for the asymptotic total error we call the invertibility failure of very large models on few training points. Because the generalized aliasing decomposition can be explicitly calculated from the relationship between model class and samples without seeing any data labels, it can answer questions related to experimental design and model selection before collecting data or performing experiments. We demonstrate this approach using several examples, including classical regression problems and a cluster expansion model used in materials science.
Read more8/16/2024
0
A Bias-Variance Decomposition for Ensembles over Multiple Synthetic Datasets
Ossi Raisa, Antti Honkela
Recent studies have highlighted the benefits of generating multiple synthetic datasets for supervised learning, from increased accuracy to more effective model selection and uncertainty estimation. These benefits have clear empirical support, but the theoretical understanding of them is currently very light. We seek to increase the theoretical understanding by deriving bias-variance decompositions for several settings of using multiple synthetic datasets, including differentially private synthetic data. Our theory predicts multiple synthetic datasets to be especially beneficial for high-variance downstream predictors, and yields a simple rule of thumb to select the appropriate number of synthetic datasets in the case of mean-squared error and Brier score. We investigate how our theory works in practice by evaluating the performance of an ensemble over many synthetic datasets for several real datasets and downstream predictors. The results follow our theory, showing that our insights are practically relevant.
Read more5/24/2024
🤷
0
A Bias-Variance-Covariance Decomposition of Kernel Scores for Generative Models
Sebastian G. Gruber, Florian Buettner
Generative models, like large language models, are becoming increasingly relevant in our daily lives, yet a theoretical framework to assess their generalization behavior and uncertainty does not exist. Particularly, the problem of uncertainty estimation is commonly solved in an ad-hoc and task-dependent manner. For example, natural language approaches cannot be transferred to image generation. In this paper, we introduce the first bias-variance-covariance decomposition for kernel scores. This decomposition represents a theoretical framework from which we derive a kernel-based variance and entropy for uncertainty estimation. We propose unbiased and consistent estimators for each quantity which only require generated samples but not the underlying model itself. Based on the wide applicability of kernels, we demonstrate our framework via generalization and uncertainty experiments for image, audio, and language generation. Specifically, kernel entropy for uncertainty estimation is more predictive of performance on CoQA and TriviaQA question answering datasets than existing baselines and can also be applied to closed-source models.
Read more7/11/2024
👁️
0
Interpretability Illusions in the Generalization of Simplified Models
Dan Friedman, Andrew Lampinen, Lucas Dixon, Danqi Chen, Asma Ghandeharioun
A common method to study deep learning systems is to use simplified model representations--for example, using singular value decomposition to visualize the model's hidden states in a lower dimensional space. This approach assumes that the results of these simplifications are faithful to the original model. Here, we illustrate an important caveat to this assumption: even if the simplified representations can accurately approximate the full model on the training set, they may fail to accurately capture the model's behavior out of distribution. We illustrate this by training Transformer models on controlled datasets with systematic generalization splits, including the Dyck balanced-parenthesis languages and a code completion task. We simplify these models using tools like dimensionality reduction and clustering, and then explicitly test how these simplified proxies match the behavior of the original model. We find consistent generalization gaps: cases in which the simplified proxies are more faithful to the original model on the in-distribution evaluations and less faithful on various tests of systematic generalization. This includes cases where the original model generalizes systematically but the simplified proxies fail, and cases where the simplified proxies generalize better. Together, our results raise questions about the extent to which mechanistic interpretations derived using tools like SVD can reliably predict what a model will do in novel situations.
Read more6/6/2024