The Real, the Better: Aligning Large Language Models with Online Human Behaviors
2405.00578
0
0
💬
Abstract
Large language model alignment is widely used and studied to avoid LLM producing unhelpful and harmful responses. However, the lengthy training process and predefined preference bias hinder adaptation to online diverse human preferences. To this end, this paper proposes an alignment framework, called Reinforcement Learning with Human Behavior (RLHB), to align LLMs by directly leveraging real online human behaviors. By taking the generative adversarial framework, the generator is trained to respond following expected human behavior; while the discriminator tries to verify whether the triplets of query, response, and human behavior come from real online environments. Behavior modeling in natural-language form and the multi-model joint training mechanism enable an active and sustainable online alignment. Experimental results confirm the effectiveness of our proposed methods by both human and automatic evaluations.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- Large language models (LLMs) are widely used, but their responses can be unhelpful or harmful
- Existing alignment methods with predefined preferences have issues adapting to diverse human preferences
- This paper proposes a new alignment framework called Reinforcement Learning with Human Behavior (RLHB) to directly leverage real online human behaviors
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text. However, they can sometimes produce responses that are not helpful or even harmful. Researchers have tried to address this by aligning the LLMs with certain preferences, but this can make them less adaptable to the diverse preferences of real people online.
This paper introduces a new approach called Reinforcement Learning with Human Behavior (RLHB). The key idea is to train the LLM to directly match the behavior of real people online, rather than just following predefined preferences. This is done using a generative adversarial framework, where the LLM (generator) tries to imitate human behavior, and a separate model (discriminator) tries to tell if the behavior is real or generated.
By modeling the language and behavior of real people, and training the LLM and discriminator together, the system can actively and sustainably align the LLM to match human preferences. The experimental results show this approach is effective according to both human and automatic evaluations.
Technical Explanation
The key technical elements of this paper are:
-
Generative Adversarial Framework: The system uses a generative adversarial network (GAN) approach, where a generator (the LLM) tries to generate responses that match real human behavior, and a discriminator tries to differentiate between real and generated behavior.
-
Behavior Modeling: The human behavior is modeled in natural language form, allowing the LLM to directly learn to imitate this behavior.
-
Multi-model Joint Training: The generator (LLM) and discriminator are trained jointly, enabling an active and sustainable alignment process.
The paper evaluates this RLHB approach against baseline methods using both human and automatic metrics. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of directly aligning the LLM with real human behavior, compared to methods that use predefined preferences.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a novel and promising approach to aligning LLMs with human preferences. By directly modeling and imitating real online behavior, the RLHB framework can potentially adapt better to diverse user needs compared to methods with predefined preferences.
However, the paper does not address some important limitations and areas for further research:
-
The behavior modeling is limited to natural language form, and may not capture other relevant aspects of human behavior, such as interactive feedback or task-oriented interactions.
-
The sustainability of the online alignment process is not thoroughly explored, such as potential issues with reward hacking or distributional shift over time.
-
The paper does not discuss the computational and resource requirements of the RLHB approach, which could be a practical concern for large-scale deployment.
Overall, the RLHB framework represents a promising step towards more adaptive and human-aligned LLMs, but further research is needed to address these limitations and ensure the approach is scalable and robust in real-world settings.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel alignment framework called Reinforcement Learning with Human Behavior (RLHB) that directly leverages real online human behaviors to align large language models (LLMs). By using a generative adversarial approach to model and imitate human behavior, the RLHB system can adaptively align the LLM to diverse user preferences, addressing limitations of existing methods with predefined preferences.
The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach, but the paper also highlights areas for further research, such as expanding the behavior modeling, ensuring long-term sustainability, and addressing practical deployment considerations. Overall, the RLHB framework represents an important step towards more human-aligned and adaptable LLMs, with potential implications for a wide range of AI applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Privately Aligning Language Models with Reinforcement Learning
Fan Wu, Huseyin A. Inan, Arturs Backurs, Varun Chandrasekaran, Janardhan Kulkarni, Robert Sim
0
0
Positioned between pre-training and user deployment, aligning large language models (LLMs) through reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a prevailing strategy for training instruction following-models such as ChatGPT. In this work, we initiate the study of privacy-preserving alignment of LLMs through Differential Privacy (DP) in conjunction with RL. Following the influential work of Ziegler et al. (2020), we study two dominant paradigms: (i) alignment via RL without human in the loop (e.g., positive review generation) and (ii) alignment via RL from human feedback (RLHF) (e.g., summarization in a human-preferred way). We give a new DP framework to achieve alignment via RL, and prove its correctness. Our experimental results validate the effectiveness of our approach, offering competitive utility while ensuring strong privacy protections.
5/6/2024
💬
Aligning language models with human preferences
Tomasz Korbak
0
0
Language models (LMs) trained on vast quantities of text data can acquire sophisticated skills such as generating summaries, answering questions or generating code. However, they also manifest behaviors that violate human preferences, e.g., they can generate offensive content, falsehoods or perpetuate social biases. In this thesis, I explore several approaches to aligning LMs with human preferences. First, I argue that aligning LMs can be seen as Bayesian inference: conditioning a prior (base, pretrained LM) on evidence about human preferences (Chapter 2). Conditioning on human preferences can be implemented in numerous ways. In Chapter 3, I investigate the relation between two approaches to finetuning pretrained LMs using feedback given by a scoring function: reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and distribution matching. I show that RLHF can be seen as a special case of distribution matching but distributional matching is strictly more general. In chapter 4, I show how to extend the distribution matching to conditional language models. Finally, in chapter 5 I explore a different root: conditioning an LM on human preferences already during pretraining. I show that involving human feedback from the very start tends to be more effective than using it only during supervised finetuning. Overall, these results highlight the room for alignment techniques different from and complementary to RLHF.
4/19/2024
Understanding the Learning Dynamics of Alignment with Human Feedback
Shawn Im, Yixuan Li
0
0
Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human intentions has become a critical task for safely deploying models in real-world systems. While existing alignment approaches have seen empirical success, theoretically understanding how these methods affect model behavior remains an open question. Our work provides an initial attempt to theoretically analyze the learning dynamics of human preference alignment. We formally show how the distribution of preference datasets influences the rate of model updates and provide rigorous guarantees on the training accuracy. Our theory also reveals an intricate phenomenon where the optimization is prone to prioritizing certain behaviors with higher preference distinguishability. We empirically validate our findings on contemporary LLMs and alignment tasks, reinforcing our theoretical insights and shedding light on considerations for future alignment approaches. Disclaimer: This paper contains potentially offensive text; reader discretion is advised.
4/17/2024
Linear Alignment: A Closed-form Solution for Aligning Human Preferences without Tuning and Feedback
Songyang Gao, Qiming Ge, Wei Shen, Shihan Dou, Junjie Ye, Xiao Wang, Rui Zheng, Yicheng Zou, Zhi Chen, Hang Yan, Qi Zhang, Dahua Lin
0
0
The success of AI assistants based on Language Models (LLMs) hinges on Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) to comprehend and align with user intentions. However, traditional alignment algorithms, such as PPO, are hampered by complex annotation and training requirements. This reliance limits the applicability of RLHF and hinders the development of professional assistants tailored to diverse human preferences. In this work, we introduce textit{Linear Alignment}, a novel algorithm that aligns language models with human preferences in one single inference step, eliminating the reliance on data annotation and model training. Linear alignment incorporates a new parameterization for policy optimization under divergence constraints, which enables the extraction of optimal policy in a closed-form manner and facilitates the direct estimation of the aligned response. Extensive experiments on both general and personalized preference datasets demonstrate that linear alignment significantly enhances the performance and efficiency of LLM alignment across diverse scenarios. Our code and dataset is published on url{https://github.com/Wizardcoast/Linear_Alignment.git}.
5/7/2024