An'alise de ambiguidade lingu'istica em modelos de linguagem de grande escala (LLMs)
0
🌿
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores the challenge of linguistic ambiguity for natural language processing (NLP) systems, focusing on three types prevalent in Brazilian Portuguese: semantic, syntactic, and lexical ambiguity.
- The researchers created a corpus of 120 ambiguous and unambiguous sentences for classification, explanation, and disambiguation.
- They also investigated the ability of advanced models like ChatGPT and Gemini to generate ambiguous sentences.
- The results indicate that even the most sophisticated models exhibit errors and inconsistencies in their responses, highlighting the need for further research and improvements in handling linguistic ambiguity.
Plain English Explanation
Natural language processing (NLP) systems, which are designed to understand and interpret human language, often struggle with ambiguity. Ambiguity occurs when a word, phrase, or sentence can have multiple meanings or interpretations. This is a significant challenge for NLP models like ChatGPT and Gemini.
To better understand this issue, the researchers in this study focused on three types of ambiguity found in Brazilian Portuguese: semantic, syntactic, and lexical ambiguity. Semantic ambiguity occurs when a word or phrase has multiple meanings, syntactic ambiguity arises from the structure of a sentence, and lexical ambiguity happens when a single word has multiple definitions.
The researchers created a collection of 120 sentences, some of which were ambiguous, and others were not. They then tested the ability of advanced NLP models to classify, explain, and resolve these ambiguous sentences. They also asked the models to generate their own sets of ambiguous sentences for each type of ambiguity.
The results of the study were quite surprising. Even the most sophisticated NLP models, like ChatGPT and Gemini, made mistakes and provided inconsistent explanations when dealing with ambiguous language. The accuracy of the models' responses peaked at only around 50%, indicating that there is still significant room for improvement in handling linguistic ambiguity.
This research highlights the need for further studies and advancements in NLP to better understand and address the challenges of ambiguity. As language models become more advanced and are used in a wider range of applications, such as spoken language understanding and marketing, the ability to handle ambiguity will become increasingly important.
Technical Explanation
The study aimed to analyze and discuss linguistic ambiguity within state-of-the-art language models, such as ChatGPT and Gemini, focusing on three types prevalent in Brazilian Portuguese: semantic, syntactic, and lexical ambiguity.
The researchers created a corpus of 120 sentences, both ambiguous and unambiguous, for classification, explanation, and disambiguation tasks. They also explored the models' capability to generate ambiguous sentences by soliciting sets of sentences for each type of ambiguity.
The results of the study were analyzed using both qualitative and quantitative methods. The qualitative analysis drew on recognized linguistic references to assess the models' explanations, while the quantitative assessment was based on the accuracy of the responses obtained.
The findings indicate that even the most sophisticated language models exhibit errors and inconsistencies in their responses to ambiguous language. The accuracy of the models peaked at only 49.58%, suggesting the need for more descriptive studies and supervised learning approaches to improve the handling of linguistic ambiguity.
Critical Analysis
The study provides valuable insights into the limitations of current language models, such as ChatGPT and Gemini, in dealing with linguistic ambiguity. However, it is important to note that the research was conducted on Brazilian Portuguese, and the findings may not necessarily generalize to other languages or language models.
Additionally, the study focused on three specific types of ambiguity (semantic, syntactic, and lexical), but there may be other forms of ambiguity that were not explored. It would be beneficial to investigate the models' performance on a wider range of ambiguity types to better understand their limitations.
The relatively low accuracy of the models' responses, peaking at only 49.58%, raises concerns about the reliability and robustness of these systems in real-world applications. Further research is needed to develop more effective strategies for handling linguistic ambiguity, potentially incorporating techniques like supervised learning or explainable AI approaches.
Overall, the study underscores the need for continued advancements in natural language processing to improve the handling of linguistic ambiguity and enhance the reliability and performance of language models in real-world applications.
Conclusion
This study highlights the significant challenge of linguistic ambiguity for state-of-the-art language models, even advanced systems like ChatGPT and Gemini. The researchers' findings suggest that current NLP models struggle to accurately classify, explain, and resolve ambiguous language, particularly in the context of Brazilian Portuguese.
The study's implications extend beyond the specific language studied, as linguistic ambiguity is a pervasive issue in natural language processing. As language models become more widely adopted in various applications, such as spoken language understanding and marketing, the ability to handle ambiguity will be crucial for their reliable and effective deployment.
This research underscores the need for continued advancements in NLP, including the development of more robust and versatile language models that can better navigate the complexities of human language. By addressing the challenges of linguistic ambiguity, researchers and developers can contribute to the creation of more reliable and trustworthy natural language processing systems, with far-reaching implications for various industries and applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌿
0
An'alise de ambiguidade lingu'istica em modelos de linguagem de grande escala (LLMs)
Lav'inia de Carvalho Moraes, Irene Cristina Silv'erio, Rafael Alexandre Sousa Marques, Bianca de Castro Anaia, Dandara Freitas de Paula, Maria Carolina Schincariol de Faria, Iury Cleveston, Alana de Santana Correia, Raquel Meister Ko Freitag
Linguistic ambiguity continues to represent a significant challenge for natural language processing (NLP) systems, notwithstanding the advancements in architectures such as Transformers and BERT. Inspired by the recent success of instructional models like ChatGPT and Gemini (In 2023, the artificial intelligence was called Bard.), this study aims to analyze and discuss linguistic ambiguity within these models, focusing on three types prevalent in Brazilian Portuguese: semantic, syntactic, and lexical ambiguity. We create a corpus comprising 120 sentences, both ambiguous and unambiguous, for classification, explanation, and disambiguation. The models capability to generate ambiguous sentences was also explored by soliciting sets of sentences for each type of ambiguity. The results underwent qualitative analysis, drawing on recognized linguistic references, and quantitative assessment based on the accuracy of the responses obtained. It was evidenced that even the most sophisticated models, such as ChatGPT and Gemini, exhibit errors and deficiencies in their responses, with explanations often providing inconsistent. Furthermore, the accuracy peaked at 49.58 percent, indicating the need for descriptive studies for supervised learning.
Read more4/26/2024
0
Aligning Language Models to Explicitly Handle Ambiguity
Hyuhng Joon Kim, Youna Kim, Cheonbok Park, Junyeob Kim, Choonghyun Park, Kang Min Yoo, Sang-goo Lee, Taeuk Kim
In interactions between users and language model agents, user utterances frequently exhibit ellipsis (omission of words or phrases) or imprecision (lack of exactness) to prioritize efficiency. This can lead to varying interpretations of the same input based on different assumptions or background knowledge. It is thus crucial for agents to adeptly handle the inherent ambiguity in queries to ensure reliability. However, even state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) still face challenges in such scenarios, primarily due to the following hurdles: (1) LLMs are not explicitly trained to deal with ambiguous utterances; (2) the degree of ambiguity perceived by the LLMs may vary depending on the possessed knowledge. To address these issues, we propose Alignment with Perceived Ambiguity (APA), a novel pipeline that aligns LLMs to manage ambiguous queries by leveraging their own assessment of ambiguity (i.e., perceived ambiguity). Experimental results on question-answering datasets demonstrate that APA empowers LLMs to explicitly detect and manage ambiguous queries while retaining the ability to answer clear questions. Furthermore, our finding proves that APA excels beyond training with gold-standard labels, especially in out-of-distribution scenarios.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Behavioral Testing: Can Large Language Models Implicitly Resolve Ambiguous Entities?
Anastasiia Sedova, Robert Litschko, Diego Frassinelli, Benjamin Roth, Barbara Plank
One of the major aspects contributing to the striking performance of large language models (LLMs) is the vast amount of factual knowledge accumulated during pre-training. Yet, many LLMs suffer from self-inconsistency, which raises doubts about their trustworthiness and reliability. In this paper, we focus on entity type ambiguity and analyze current state-of-the-art LLMs for their proficiency and consistency in applying their factual knowledge when prompted for entities under ambiguity. To do so, we propose an evaluation protocol that disentangles knowing from applying knowledge, and test state-of-the-art LLMs on 49 entities. Our experiments reveal that LLMs perform poorly with ambiguous prompts, achieving only 80% accuracy. Our results further demonstrate systematic discrepancies in LLM behavior and their failure to consistently apply information, indicating that the models can exhibit knowledge without being able to utilize it, significant biases for preferred readings, as well as self inconsistencies. Our study highlights the importance of handling entity ambiguity in future for more trustworthy LLMs
Read more7/26/2024
0
Bidirectional Transformer Representations of (Spanish) Ambiguous Words in Context: A New Lexical Resource and Empirical Analysis
Pamela D. Rivi`ere (Department of Cognitive Science UC San Diego), Anne L. Beatty-Mart'inez (Department of Cognitive Science UC San Diego), Sean Trott (Department of Cognitive Science UC San Diego, Computational Social Science UC San Diego)
Lexical ambiguity -- where a single wordform takes on distinct, context-dependent meanings -- serves as a useful tool to compare across different large language models' (LLMs') ability to form distinct, contextualized representations of the same stimulus. Few studies have systematically compared LLMs' contextualized word embeddings for languages beyond English. Here, we evaluate multiple bidirectional transformers' (BERTs') semantic representations of Spanish ambiguous nouns in context. We develop a novel dataset of minimal-pair sentences evoking the same or different sense for a target ambiguous noun. In a pre-registered study, we collect contextualized human relatedness judgments for each sentence pair. We find that various BERT-based LLMs' contextualized semantic representations capture some variance in human judgments but fall short of the human benchmark, and for Spanish -- unlike English -- model scale is uncorrelated with performance. We also identify stereotyped trajectories of target noun disambiguation as a proportion of traversal through a given LLM family's architecture, which we partially replicate in English. We contribute (1) a dataset of controlled, Spanish sentence stimuli with human relatedness norms, and (2) to our evolving understanding of the impact that LLM specification (architectures, training protocols) exerts on contextualized embeddings.
Read more6/24/2024