Aligning Language Models to Explicitly Handle Ambiguity
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses techniques for aligning large language models to explicitly handle ambiguity in natural language processing (NLP) tasks.
- It explores methods to make language models more aware of and robust to ambiguous inputs, which is an important challenge in real-world NLP applications.
- The proposed approaches aim to improve the performance and reliability of language models in the face of inherent ambiguity in human language.
Plain English Explanation
Language models are powerful artificial intelligence systems that can generate human-like text, answer questions, and assist with a variety of tasks. However, one of the key challenges these models face is handling ambiguity in language. Ambiguity arises when a word, phrase, or sentence can have multiple possible meanings or interpretations.
For example, the sentence "I saw the man with the telescope" could mean that the speaker used a telescope to see the man, or that the man was holding a telescope. Humans can often easily resolve such ambiguities based on context, but language models can struggle with this.
The researchers in this paper explore ways to make language models more "ambiguity-aware". This could involve techniques like explicitly modeling the uncertainty in language, or using additional supervised knowledge to help the model understand the different possible interpretations.
By making language models more adept at handling ambiguity, the goal is to improve their performance and reliability in real-world applications, such as conversational AI or question answering systems. This could lead to more natural and effective interactions between humans and AI assistants.
The researchers also explore ways to customize language model responses to better fit the specific context and needs of each user or application. By making language models more adaptable and ambiguity-aware, the aim is to unlock their full potential for a wide range of real-world uses.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes several techniques for aligning large language models to better handle ambiguity in natural language processing tasks.
One approach is to explicitly model the uncertainty in language by incorporating ambiguity-aware loss functions during the training of the language model. This allows the model to learn to assign probabilities to the different possible interpretations of ambiguous inputs, rather than just predicting a single output.
The researchers also explore incorporating additional supervised knowledge, such as linguistic annotations or commonsense reasoning, to help the language model understand the different semantic meanings and contextual implications of ambiguous phrases. This "knowledge-enhanced" training can improve the model's ability to resolve ambiguities.
Additionally, the paper investigates methods for customizing language model responses to better fit the specific needs and context of each application. This could involve techniques like contrastive learning, where the model is trained to generate responses that are optimized for a particular user or task, rather than a one-size-fits-all approach.
Through a series of experiments on benchmark NLP tasks, the researchers demonstrate that these ambiguity-aware and customization techniques can lead to significant improvements in the performance and reliability of large language models. The models become better equipped to handle the inherent ambiguity present in human language, which is a crucial step towards more effective and natural interactions between humans and AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the importance of addressing ambiguity in language models, and the proposed techniques represent a valuable contribution to the field. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further exploration:
The paper focuses primarily on improving language model performance on standard NLP benchmarks, but it would be helpful to see more real-world application-focused evaluations. Assessing the impact of these ambiguity-aware techniques in domains like conversational AI or question answering could provide valuable insights into their practical benefits.
Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of incorporating additional supervised knowledge, the specific types of knowledge and the best ways to integrate them are not fully explored. Further research into more diverse knowledge sources and integration methods could lead to even more robust and versatile ambiguity-handling capabilities.
Finally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential biases or ethical considerations that may arise from these ambiguity-aware language models. As these systems become more widely deployed, it will be crucial to carefully examine their fairness, transparency, and alignment with human values.
Overall, the research presented in this paper represents an important step towards building more intelligent and reliable language models that can better navigate the complexities of human communication. Continued advancements in this direction will be vital for the successful integration of AI into our everyday lives.
Conclusion
This paper outlines novel techniques for aligning large language models to explicitly handle ambiguity in natural language processing tasks. By incorporating ambiguity-aware training approaches, leveraging additional supervised knowledge, and customizing model responses to specific contexts, the researchers demonstrate significant improvements in the performance and reliability of these powerful AI systems.
The ability to effectively navigate the inherent ambiguity of human language is a crucial challenge for language models, and the solutions proposed in this paper represent an important contribution to the field. As AI-powered conversational agents, question-answering systems, and other applications become more prevalent, equipping these models with robust ambiguity-handling capabilities will be essential for enabling more natural, intuitive, and trustworthy interactions between humans and machines.
While the paper's findings are promising, there are still opportunities for further research, such as exploring a wider range of real-world applications, investigating more diverse knowledge sources, and addressing potential ethical considerations. Nonetheless, this work marks a significant step forward in the pursuit of AI systems that can truly understand and engage with the complexities of human communication.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Aligning Language Models to Explicitly Handle Ambiguity
Hyuhng Joon Kim, Youna Kim, Cheonbok Park, Junyeob Kim, Choonghyun Park, Kang Min Yoo, Sang-goo Lee, Taeuk Kim
In interactions between users and language model agents, user utterances frequently exhibit ellipsis (omission of words or phrases) or imprecision (lack of exactness) to prioritize efficiency. This can lead to varying interpretations of the same input based on different assumptions or background knowledge. It is thus crucial for agents to adeptly handle the inherent ambiguity in queries to ensure reliability. However, even state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) still face challenges in such scenarios, primarily due to the following hurdles: (1) LLMs are not explicitly trained to deal with ambiguous utterances; (2) the degree of ambiguity perceived by the LLMs may vary depending on the possessed knowledge. To address these issues, we propose Alignment with Perceived Ambiguity (APA), a novel pipeline that aligns LLMs to manage ambiguous queries by leveraging their own assessment of ambiguity (i.e., perceived ambiguity). Experimental results on question-answering datasets demonstrate that APA empowers LLMs to explicitly detect and manage ambiguous queries while retaining the ability to answer clear questions. Furthermore, our finding proves that APA excels beyond training with gold-standard labels, especially in out-of-distribution scenarios.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Behavioral Testing: Can Large Language Models Implicitly Resolve Ambiguous Entities?
Anastasiia Sedova, Robert Litschko, Diego Frassinelli, Benjamin Roth, Barbara Plank
One of the major aspects contributing to the striking performance of large language models (LLMs) is the vast amount of factual knowledge accumulated during pre-training. Yet, many LLMs suffer from self-inconsistency, which raises doubts about their trustworthiness and reliability. In this paper, we focus on entity type ambiguity and analyze current state-of-the-art LLMs for their proficiency and consistency in applying their factual knowledge when prompted for entities under ambiguity. To do so, we propose an evaluation protocol that disentangles knowing from applying knowledge, and test state-of-the-art LLMs on 49 entities. Our experiments reveal that LLMs perform poorly with ambiguous prompts, achieving only 80% accuracy. Our results further demonstrate systematic discrepancies in LLM behavior and their failure to consistently apply information, indicating that the models can exhibit knowledge without being able to utilize it, significant biases for preferred readings, as well as self inconsistencies. Our study highlights the importance of handling entity ambiguity in future for more trustworthy LLMs
Read more7/26/2024
👁️
0
New!AER-LLM: Ambiguity-aware Emotion Recognition Leveraging Large Language Models
Xin Hong, Yuan Gong, Vidhyasaharan Sethu, Ting Dang
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated great success in many Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. In addition to their cognitive intelligence, exploring their capabilities in emotional intelligence is also crucial, as it enables more natural and empathetic conversational AI. Recent studies have shown LLMs' capability in recognizing emotions, but they often focus on single emotion labels and overlook the complex and ambiguous nature of human emotions. This study is the first to address this gap by exploring the potential of LLMs in recognizing ambiguous emotions, leveraging their strong generalization capabilities and in-context learning. We design zero-shot and few-shot prompting and incorporate past dialogue as context information for ambiguous emotion recognition. Experiments conducted using three datasets indicate significant potential for LLMs in recognizing ambiguous emotions, and highlight the substantial benefits of including context information. Furthermore, our findings indicate that LLMs demonstrate a high degree of effectiveness in recognizing less ambiguous emotions and exhibit potential for identifying more ambiguous emotions, paralleling human perceptual capabilities.
Read more9/30/2024
💬
0
Integrating Disambiguation and User Preferences into Large Language Models for Robot Motion Planning
Mohammed Abugurain, Shinkyu Park
This paper presents a framework that can interpret humans' navigation commands containing temporal elements and directly translate their natural language instructions into robot motion planning. Central to our framework is utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs). To enhance the reliability of LLMs in the framework and improve user experience, we propose methods to resolve the ambiguity in natural language instructions and capture user preferences. The process begins with an ambiguity classifier, identifying potential uncertainties in the instructions. Ambiguous statements trigger a GPT-4-based mechanism that generates clarifying questions, incorporating user responses for disambiguation. Also, the framework assesses and records user preferences for non-ambiguous instructions, enhancing future interactions. The last part of this process is the translation of disambiguated instructions into a robot motion plan using Linear Temporal Logic. This paper details the development of this framework and the evaluation of its performance in various test scenarios.
Read more4/24/2024