Analysing Cross-Speaker Convergence in Face-to-Face Dialogue through the Lens of Automatically Detected Shared Linguistic Constructions
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how speakers in face-to-face dialogues converge in their language use over the course of a conversation.
- The researchers developed a method to automatically detect shared linguistic constructions between speakers, which they used as a proxy for measuring convergence.
- They applied this approach to analyze a corpus of naturally occurring dialogues, providing insights into the dynamics of cross-speaker linguistic entrainment.
Plain English Explanation
When people have a conversation, they often start to use similar words, phrases, and ways of speaking over time. This is known as linguistic convergence or entrainment. [The paper at https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/leeets-dial-linguistic-entrainment-end-to-end explores this phenomenon in more depth.]
In this study, the researchers looked at how this convergence happens in face-to-face dialogues. They created a way to automatically identify shared linguistic constructions - things like common phrases or sentence structures - that the speakers start to use with each other. By tracking these shared constructions, they could measure how much the speakers' language converged over the course of the conversation.
The researchers applied their method to analyze a set of real-world dialogues. This allowed them to gain insights into the dynamic process of linguistic entrainment between speakers. [This relates to research on language bargaining and hybrid cooperative contrastive learning in conversations.]
Technical Explanation
The key innovation in this paper is the researchers' approach to automatically detecting shared linguistic constructions between speakers as a way to measure linguistic convergence. They developed a multi-stage model that first identifies candidate constructions, then filters and ranks them to find the most salient shared constructions between each pair of speakers.
This method was applied to a corpus of 102 face-to-face dialogues. The researchers analyzed how the number and nature of shared constructions changed over the course of each conversation, providing insights into the dynamics of cross-speaker linguistic entrainment.
Their results suggest that speakers rapidly converge on using certain linguistic constructions, with the rate of convergence slowing over time. The degree of convergence was also influenced by factors like the speakers' familiarity and the topic under discussion.
Critical Analysis
One limitation of this work is that it relies on the accuracy of the underlying natural language processing models used to detect the linguistic constructions. If these models have biases or make errors, it could affect the validity of the convergence measures.
Additionally, the research focuses only on the linguistic aspects of convergence, without considering other modalities like prosody, gestures, or facial expressions. [Further research, such as the work on grounding gaps in language model generations, could explore multimodal convergence dynamics.]
It would also be valuable to investigate how the observed patterns of linguistic convergence relate to the broader goals and outcomes of the dialogue, such as task success or rapport building. [This could connect to research on conversational speech recognition.]
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to analyzing linguistic convergence in face-to-face dialogues by automatically detecting shared linguistic constructions between speakers. The results provide valuable insights into the dynamic process of cross-speaker entrainment and have implications for our understanding of natural language use and dialogue.
While the work has some limitations, it represents an important step forward in the study of linguistic alignment and coordination in conversational settings. Further research building on this foundation could yield additional insights into the complex interplay of language, cognition, and social interaction.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Analysing Cross-Speaker Convergence in Face-to-Face Dialogue through the Lens of Automatically Detected Shared Linguistic Constructions
Esam Ghaleb, Marlou Rasenberg, Wim Pouw, Ivan Toni, Judith Holler, Asl{i} Ozyurek, Raquel Fern'andez
Conversation requires a substantial amount of coordination between dialogue participants, from managing turn taking to negotiating mutual understanding. Part of this coordination effort surfaces as the reuse of linguistic behaviour across speakers, a process often referred to as alignment. While the presence of linguistic alignment is well documented in the literature, several questions remain open, including the extent to which patterns of reuse across speakers have an impact on the emergence of labelling conventions for novel referents. In this study, we put forward a methodology for automatically detecting shared lemmatised constructions -- expressions with a common lexical core used by both speakers within a dialogue -- and apply it to a referential communication corpus where participants aim to identify novel objects for which no established labels exist. Our analyses uncover the usage patterns of shared constructions in interaction and reveal that features such as their frequency and the amount of different constructions used for a referent are associated with the degree of object labelling convergence the participants exhibit after social interaction. More generally, the present study shows that automatically detected shared constructions offer a useful level of analysis to investigate the dynamics of reference negotiation in dialogue.
Read more5/15/2024
0
Revisiting the Phenomenon of Syntactic Complexity Convergence on German Dialogue Data
Yu Wang, Hendrik Buschmeier
We revisit the phenomenon of syntactic complexity convergence in conversational interaction, originally found for English dialogue, which has theoretical implication for dialogical concepts such as mutual understanding. We use a modified metric to quantify syntactic complexity based on dependency parsing. The results show that syntactic complexity convergence can be statistically confirmed in one of three selected German datasets that were analysed. Given that the dataset which shows such convergence is much larger than the other two selected datasets, the empirical results indicate a certain degree of linguistic generality of syntactic complexity convergence in conversational interaction. We also found a different type of syntactic complexity convergence in one of the datasets while further investigation is still necessary.
Read more8/23/2024
0
The Curious Case of Representational Alignment: Unravelling Visio-Linguistic Tasks in Emergent Communication
Tom Kouwenhoven, Max Peeperkorn, Bram van Dijk, Tessa Verhoef
Natural language has the universal properties of being compositional and grounded in reality. The emergence of linguistic properties is often investigated through simulations of emergent communication in referential games. However, these experiments have yielded mixed results compared to similar experiments addressing linguistic properties of human language. Here we address representational alignment as a potential contributing factor to these results. Specifically, we assess the representational alignment between agent image representations and between agent representations and input images. Doing so, we confirm that the emergent language does not appear to encode human-like conceptual visual features, since agent image representations drift away from inputs whilst inter-agent alignment increases. We moreover identify a strong relationship between inter-agent alignment and topographic similarity, a common metric for compositionality, and address its consequences. To address these issues, we introduce an alignment penalty that prevents representational drift but interestingly does not improve performance on a compositional discrimination task. Together, our findings emphasise the key role representational alignment plays in simulations of language emergence.
Read more7/26/2024
0
Probing the Emergence of Cross-lingual Alignment during LLM Training
Hetong Wang, Pasquale Minervini, Edoardo M. Ponti
Multilingual Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve remarkable levels of zero-shot cross-lingual transfer performance. We speculate that this is predicated on their ability to align languages without explicit supervision from parallel sentences. While representations of translationally equivalent sentences in different languages are known to be similar after convergence, however, it remains unclear how such cross-lingual alignment emerges during pre-training of LLMs. Our study leverages intrinsic probing techniques, which identify which subsets of neurons encode linguistic features, to correlate the degree of cross-lingual neuron overlap with the zero-shot cross-lingual transfer performance for a given model. In particular, we rely on checkpoints of BLOOM, a multilingual autoregressive LLM, across different training steps and model scales. We observe a high correlation between neuron overlap and downstream performance, which supports our hypothesis on the conditions leading to effective cross-lingual transfer. Interestingly, we also detect a degradation of both implicit alignment and multilingual abilities in certain phases of the pre-training process, providing new insights into the multilingual pretraining dynamics.
Read more6/21/2024