Analysis of Linear Mode Connectivity via Permutation-Based Weight Matching

Read original: arXiv:2402.04051 - Published 4/16/2024 by Akira Ito, Masanori Yamada, Atsutoshi Kumagai
Total Score

0

💬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper by Ainsworth et al. analyzes the concept of linear mode connectivity (LMC) in neural networks and how it can be achieved using weight matching (WM) techniques.
  • LMC refers to a property where the loss along a linear path between two independently trained models with different seeds remains nearly constant.
  • The paper provides a theoretical analysis of LMC using WM, which is important for understanding the effectiveness of stochastic gradient descent and its applications in model merging.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores a technique called weight matching (WM) that helps identify permutations of neural network model parameters that satisfy linear mode connectivity (LMC). LMC is a property where the loss (a measure of how well the model is performing) along a straight line between two independently trained models remains nearly constant.

The researchers first show that the permutations found by WM do not significantly reduce the distance between the two models, and the occurrence of LMC is not just due to this distance reduction. They then provide theoretical insights, explaining that the permutations found by WM mainly align the directions of the singular vectors (a way of describing the model's internal structure) associated with large singular values, which determine the model's functionality. This alignment helps the merged model retain the functionality of the pre-merged models, making it easier to satisfy LMC.

Finally, the paper compares WM to a different method called straight-through estimator (STE), which is a dataset-dependent permutation search method. The researchers show that WM outperforms STE, especially when merging three or more models.

Technical Explanation

The paper first experimentally and theoretically demonstrates that the permutations found by WM do not significantly reduce the $L_2$ distance between the two models, and the occurrence of LMC is not merely due to this distance reduction. The researchers then provide theoretical insights, showing that the permutations found by WM mainly align the directions of the singular vectors associated with large singular values, which determine the model's functionality, across the pre-merged and post-merged models. This alignment helps the merged model retain the functionality of the pre-merged models, making it easier to satisfy LMC.

The paper also analyzes the differences between WM and straight-through estimator (STE), a dataset-dependent permutation search method. The researchers demonstrate that WM outperforms STE, especially when merging three or more models.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive theoretical analysis of LMC and its connection to WM, which is a valuable contribution to the field. However, the authors acknowledge that the theoretical analysis assumes certain simplifications, such as linear activation functions and a limited set of network architectures. Further research may be needed to understand the applicability of these findings to more complex network architectures and nonlinear activation functions.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the technical aspects of the WM and STE methods, but it does not extensively discuss the practical implications or potential real-world applications of this research. Readers may be interested in exploring how these techniques could be leveraged in areas like model merging, uncertainty estimation, or mixed-membership modeling.

Conclusion

The paper provides a valuable theoretical analysis of linear mode connectivity (LMC) in neural networks and how it can be achieved using weight matching (WM) techniques. The key insights are that WM aligns the directions of the singular vectors associated with large singular values, which determines the model's functionality, allowing the merged model to retain the functionality of the pre-merged models and satisfy LMC. While the theoretical analysis has some limitations, the findings have important implications for understanding the effectiveness of stochastic gradient descent and its applications in areas like model merging.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Total Score

0

Analysis of Linear Mode Connectivity via Permutation-Based Weight Matching

Akira Ito, Masanori Yamada, Atsutoshi Kumagai

Recently, Ainsworth et al. showed that using weight matching (WM) to minimize the $L_2$ distance in a permutation search of model parameters effectively identifies permutations that satisfy linear mode connectivity (LMC), in which the loss along a linear path between two independently trained models with different seeds remains nearly constant. This paper provides a theoretical analysis of LMC using WM, which is crucial for understanding stochastic gradient descent's effectiveness and its application in areas like model merging. We first experimentally and theoretically show that permutations found by WM do not significantly reduce the $L_2$ distance between two models and the occurrence of LMC is not merely due to distance reduction by WM in itself. We then provide theoretical insights showing that permutations can change the directions of the singular vectors, but not the singular values, of the weight matrices in each layer. This finding shows that permutations found by WM mainly align the directions of singular vectors associated with large singular values across models. This alignment brings the singular vectors with large singular values, which determine the model functionality, closer between pre-merged and post-merged models, so that the post-merged model retains functionality similar to the pre-merged models, making it easy to satisfy LMC. Finally, we analyze the difference between WM and straight-through estimator (STE), a dataset-dependent permutation search method, and show that WM outperforms STE, especially when merging three or more models.

Read more

4/16/2024

↗️

Total Score

0

Linear Mode Connectivity in Differentiable Tree Ensembles

Ryuichi Kanoh, Mahito Sugiyama

Linear Mode Connectivity (LMC) refers to the phenomenon that performance remains consistent for linearly interpolated models in the parameter space. For independently optimized model pairs from different random initializations, achieving LMC is considered crucial for validating the stable success of the non-convex optimization in modern machine learning models and for facilitating practical parameter-based operations such as model merging. While LMC has been achieved for neural networks by considering the permutation invariance of neurons in each hidden layer, its attainment for other models remains an open question. In this paper, we first achieve LMC for soft tree ensembles, which are tree-based differentiable models extensively used in practice. We show the necessity of incorporating two invariances: subtree flip invariance and splitting order invariance, which do not exist in neural networks but are inherent to tree architectures, in addition to permutation invariance of trees. Moreover, we demonstrate that it is even possible to exclude such additional invariances while keeping LMC by designing decision list-based tree architectures, where such invariances do not exist by definition. Our findings indicate the significance of accounting for architecture-specific invariances in achieving LMC.

Read more

5/24/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Landscaping Linear Mode Connectivity

Sidak Pal Singh, Linara Adilova, Michael Kamp, Asja Fischer, Bernhard Scholkopf, Thomas Hofmann

The presence of linear paths in parameter space between two different network solutions in certain cases, i.e., linear mode connectivity (LMC), has garnered interest from both theoretical and practical fronts. There has been significant research that either practically designs algorithms catered for connecting networks by adjusting for the permutation symmetries as well as some others that more theoretically construct paths through which networks can be connected. Yet, the core reasons for the occurrence of LMC, when in fact it does occur, in the highly non-convex loss landscapes of neural networks are far from clear. In this work, we take a step towards understanding it by providing a model of how the loss landscape needs to behave topographically for LMC (or the lack thereof) to manifest. Concretely, we present a `mountainside and ridge' perspective that helps to neatly tie together different geometric features that can be spotted in the loss landscape along the training runs. We also complement this perspective by providing a theoretical analysis of the barrier height, for which we provide empirical support, and which additionally extends as a faithful predictor of layer-wise LMC. We close with a toy example that provides further intuition on how barriers arise in the first place, all in all, showcasing the larger aim of the work -- to provide a working model of the landscape and its topography for the occurrence of LMC.

Read more

6/26/2024

Simultaneous linear connectivity of neural networks modulo permutation
Total Score

0

Simultaneous linear connectivity of neural networks modulo permutation

Ekansh Sharma, Devin Kwok, Tom Denton, Daniel M. Roy, David Rolnick, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite

Neural networks typically exhibit permutation symmetries which contribute to the non-convexity of the networks' loss landscapes, since linearly interpolating between two permuted versions of a trained network tends to encounter a high loss barrier. Recent work has argued that permutation symmetries are the only sources of non-convexity, meaning there are essentially no such barriers between trained networks if they are permuted appropriately. In this work, we refine these arguments into three distinct claims of increasing strength. We show that existing evidence only supports weak linear connectivity-that for each pair of networks belonging to a set of SGD solutions, there exist (multiple) permutations that linearly connect it with the other networks. In contrast, the claim strong linear connectivity-that for each network, there exists one permutation that simultaneously connects it with the other networks-is both intuitively and practically more desirable. This stronger claim would imply that the loss landscape is convex after accounting for permutation, and enable linear interpolation between three or more independently trained models without increased loss. In this work, we introduce an intermediate claim-that for certain sequences of networks, there exists one permutation that simultaneously aligns matching pairs of networks from these sequences. Specifically, we discover that a single permutation aligns sequences of iteratively trained as well as iteratively pruned networks, meaning that two networks exhibit low loss barriers at each step of their optimization and sparsification trajectories respectively. Finally, we provide the first evidence that strong linear connectivity may be possible under certain conditions, by showing that barriers decrease with increasing network width when interpolating among three networks.

Read more

4/10/2024