Linear Mode Connectivity in Differentiable Tree Ensembles

Read original: arXiv:2405.14596 - Published 5/24/2024 by Ryuichi Kanoh, Mahito Sugiyama
Total Score

0

↗️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Linear Mode Connectivity (LMC) is a phenomenon where the performance of machine learning models remains consistent when their parameters are linearly interpolated.
  • Achieving LMC is crucial for validating the stability of non-convex optimization in modern machine learning models and facilitating practical operations like model merging.
  • While LMC has been achieved for neural networks, its attainment for other models remains an open question.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores the concept of Linear Mode Connectivity (LMC), which refers to the idea that the performance of machine learning models remains consistent even when their parameters are linearly interpolated. This is an important property because it helps validate the stability of the non-convex optimization process used to train these models, which is a fundamental challenge in modern machine learning.

Achieving LMC is also crucial for enabling practical operations like model merging, where two independently trained models can be combined without loss of performance. While LMC has been shown to hold for neural networks, the researchers in this paper aim to explore whether it can also be achieved for other types of machine learning models, such as tree-based models.

The key idea is that in addition to the permutation invariance of neurons (which is important for neural networks), tree-based models also need to account for other architectural-specific invariances, such as subtree flip invariance and splitting order invariance. The researchers demonstrate that by incorporating these additional invariances, they can achieve LMC for soft tree ensembles, a class of tree-based differentiable models.

Technical Explanation

The paper first establishes the necessity of incorporating two key invariances, in addition to the permutation invariance of neurons, to achieve LMC for tree-based models:

  1. Subtree flip invariance: The performance of a tree-based model should not change if the left and right branches of any internal node are flipped.
  2. Splitting order invariance: The performance of a tree-based model should not depend on the order in which the splitting thresholds are determined during the training process.

The researchers show that by designing the tree architecture to be invariant to these properties, they can achieve LMC for soft tree ensembles, a popular class of tree-based differentiable models used in practice.

Furthermore, the paper demonstrates that it is even possible to exclude such additional invariances while maintaining LMC by using a decision list-based tree architecture, where these invariances do not exist by definition.

The key insight is that accounting for architecture-specific invariances is crucial for achieving LMC, which goes beyond the permutation invariance of neurons that is important for neural networks.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the factors required to achieve LMC for tree-based models, which extends the existing understanding of this phenomenon primarily studied in the context of neural networks.

One potential limitation is that the experiments are conducted on a relatively small set of benchmark datasets, and it would be valuable to see how the proposed methods scale to larger and more complex real-world applications.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the computational overhead or training time implications of incorporating the additional invariances required for LMC in tree-based models. This aspect could be an important consideration for practical deployment.

Further research could also investigate the generalization of the LMC concept to other types of machine learning models beyond neural networks and tree-based approaches, potentially leading to more robust and adaptable model architectures.

Conclusion

The key contribution of this paper is the identification of two additional invariances, beyond the permutation invariance of neurons, that are necessary to achieve LMC for tree-based machine learning models. By accounting for these architectural-specific properties, the researchers demonstrate the ability to maintain consistent performance for linearly interpolated tree-based models, which has important implications for the stability and practical applicability of these models.

The findings highlight the significance of understanding and leveraging the unique properties of different model architectures when pursuing desirable characteristics like LMC, which can facilitate novel applications and advancements in the field of machine learning.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

↗️

Total Score

0

Linear Mode Connectivity in Differentiable Tree Ensembles

Ryuichi Kanoh, Mahito Sugiyama

Linear Mode Connectivity (LMC) refers to the phenomenon that performance remains consistent for linearly interpolated models in the parameter space. For independently optimized model pairs from different random initializations, achieving LMC is considered crucial for validating the stable success of the non-convex optimization in modern machine learning models and for facilitating practical parameter-based operations such as model merging. While LMC has been achieved for neural networks by considering the permutation invariance of neurons in each hidden layer, its attainment for other models remains an open question. In this paper, we first achieve LMC for soft tree ensembles, which are tree-based differentiable models extensively used in practice. We show the necessity of incorporating two invariances: subtree flip invariance and splitting order invariance, which do not exist in neural networks but are inherent to tree architectures, in addition to permutation invariance of trees. Moreover, we demonstrate that it is even possible to exclude such additional invariances while keeping LMC by designing decision list-based tree architectures, where such invariances do not exist by definition. Our findings indicate the significance of accounting for architecture-specific invariances in achieving LMC.

Read more

5/24/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Landscaping Linear Mode Connectivity

Sidak Pal Singh, Linara Adilova, Michael Kamp, Asja Fischer, Bernhard Scholkopf, Thomas Hofmann

The presence of linear paths in parameter space between two different network solutions in certain cases, i.e., linear mode connectivity (LMC), has garnered interest from both theoretical and practical fronts. There has been significant research that either practically designs algorithms catered for connecting networks by adjusting for the permutation symmetries as well as some others that more theoretically construct paths through which networks can be connected. Yet, the core reasons for the occurrence of LMC, when in fact it does occur, in the highly non-convex loss landscapes of neural networks are far from clear. In this work, we take a step towards understanding it by providing a model of how the loss landscape needs to behave topographically for LMC (or the lack thereof) to manifest. Concretely, we present a `mountainside and ridge' perspective that helps to neatly tie together different geometric features that can be spotted in the loss landscape along the training runs. We also complement this perspective by providing a theoretical analysis of the barrier height, for which we provide empirical support, and which additionally extends as a faithful predictor of layer-wise LMC. We close with a toy example that provides further intuition on how barriers arise in the first place, all in all, showcasing the larger aim of the work -- to provide a working model of the landscape and its topography for the occurrence of LMC.

Read more

6/26/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Analysis of Linear Mode Connectivity via Permutation-Based Weight Matching

Akira Ito, Masanori Yamada, Atsutoshi Kumagai

Recently, Ainsworth et al. showed that using weight matching (WM) to minimize the $L_2$ distance in a permutation search of model parameters effectively identifies permutations that satisfy linear mode connectivity (LMC), in which the loss along a linear path between two independently trained models with different seeds remains nearly constant. This paper provides a theoretical analysis of LMC using WM, which is crucial for understanding stochastic gradient descent's effectiveness and its application in areas like model merging. We first experimentally and theoretically show that permutations found by WM do not significantly reduce the $L_2$ distance between two models and the occurrence of LMC is not merely due to distance reduction by WM in itself. We then provide theoretical insights showing that permutations can change the directions of the singular vectors, but not the singular values, of the weight matrices in each layer. This finding shows that permutations found by WM mainly align the directions of singular vectors associated with large singular values across models. This alignment brings the singular vectors with large singular values, which determine the model functionality, closer between pre-merged and post-merged models, so that the post-merged model retains functionality similar to the pre-merged models, making it easy to satisfy LMC. Finally, we analyze the difference between WM and straight-through estimator (STE), a dataset-dependent permutation search method, and show that WM outperforms STE, especially when merging three or more models.

Read more

4/16/2024

Simultaneous linear connectivity of neural networks modulo permutation
Total Score

0

Simultaneous linear connectivity of neural networks modulo permutation

Ekansh Sharma, Devin Kwok, Tom Denton, Daniel M. Roy, David Rolnick, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite

Neural networks typically exhibit permutation symmetries which contribute to the non-convexity of the networks' loss landscapes, since linearly interpolating between two permuted versions of a trained network tends to encounter a high loss barrier. Recent work has argued that permutation symmetries are the only sources of non-convexity, meaning there are essentially no such barriers between trained networks if they are permuted appropriately. In this work, we refine these arguments into three distinct claims of increasing strength. We show that existing evidence only supports weak linear connectivity-that for each pair of networks belonging to a set of SGD solutions, there exist (multiple) permutations that linearly connect it with the other networks. In contrast, the claim strong linear connectivity-that for each network, there exists one permutation that simultaneously connects it with the other networks-is both intuitively and practically more desirable. This stronger claim would imply that the loss landscape is convex after accounting for permutation, and enable linear interpolation between three or more independently trained models without increased loss. In this work, we introduce an intermediate claim-that for certain sequences of networks, there exists one permutation that simultaneously aligns matching pairs of networks from these sequences. Specifically, we discover that a single permutation aligns sequences of iteratively trained as well as iteratively pruned networks, meaning that two networks exhibit low loss barriers at each step of their optimization and sparsification trajectories respectively. Finally, we provide the first evidence that strong linear connectivity may be possible under certain conditions, by showing that barriers decrease with increasing network width when interpolating among three networks.

Read more

4/10/2024