Analyzing Quality, Bias, and Performance in Text-to-Image Generative Models
0
🚀
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper analyzes the quality, bias, and performance of text-to-image generative models, which are AI systems that can create images from textual descriptions.
- The researchers explored issues like the severity and nature of biases in these models, as well as how well they can generate high-quality images that match the provided text prompts.
- They conducted extensive experiments and evaluations to gain insights into the capabilities and limitations of current text-to-image models.
Plain English Explanation
This paper takes a close look at text-to-image AI models - systems that can generate images based on textual descriptions. The researchers wanted to understand how well these models perform, as well as whether they exhibit biases or other issues.
To do this, they ran a range of experiments and evaluations. This allowed them to assess the quality of the images the models produced, as well as investigate the severity and nature of any biases present. For example, they checked whether the models tended to depict certain groups or concepts in unrealistic or stereotypical ways.
The findings from this analysis provide important insights into the current capabilities and limitations of text-to-image AI. This can help guide future research and development to improve these types of generative models and make them more reliable and fair.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the quality, bias, and performance characteristics of text-to-image generative models. The researchers conducted a series of experiments to evaluate several leading models, including Severity-Controlled Text-to-Image Generative Model, Would Deep Generative Models Amplify Bias in the Future?, and Can Prompt Modifiers Control Bias? A Comparative Analysis.
Their evaluation approach included both qualitative and quantitative assessments. For the qualitative analysis, they used human raters to judge the faithfulness, realism, and overall quality of the generated images. The quantitative metrics focused on measuring biases, such as using the OpenBias tool to detect biases in the output.
Through these extensive experiments, the researchers gained valuable insights into the current state of text-to-image generation. They identified areas where the models excel, as well as significant limitations and biases that need to be addressed.
Critical Analysis
The researchers highlighted several important caveats and limitations in their analysis. For example, they noted that the evaluation of model quality and bias is inherently subjective, and their findings may not generalize to all use cases or datasets.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a comprehensive solution for mitigating biases in text-to-image models. While it identifies problematic biases, more research is needed to develop effective debiasing techniques that can be widely deployed.
Another limitation is the focus on a handful of prominent models. There are many other text-to-image systems in development that were not included in this study. Expanding the analysis to a broader set of models could yield additional insights.
Despite these caveats, this paper makes a valuable contribution by shining a light on critical issues around the quality and fairness of text-to-image generation. The findings can inform future research and help guide the development of more reliable and equitable AI systems in this domain.
Conclusion
This paper presents a rigorous analysis of text-to-image generative models, examining their quality, biases, and overall performance. The researchers conducted extensive experiments to gain a nuanced understanding of the current capabilities and limitations of these AI systems.
The key takeaways include the identification of significant biases in the models, as well as areas where they excel at generating high-quality, realistic images. These insights can help guide future research and development to address the challenges and unlock the full potential of text-to-image generation.
As these technologies continue to advance, it will be crucial to ensure they are designed and deployed responsibly, with a focus on fairness, transparency, and accountability. This paper contributes important groundwork towards that goal, laying the foundation for ongoing efforts to build more reliable and equitable AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🚀
0
Analyzing Quality, Bias, and Performance in Text-to-Image Generative Models
Nila Masrourisaadat, Nazanin Sedaghatkish, Fatemeh Sarshartehrani, Edward A. Fox
Advances in generative models have led to significant interest in image synthesis, demonstrating the ability to generate high-quality images for a diverse range of text prompts. Despite this progress, most studies ignore the presence of bias. In this paper, we examine several text-to-image models not only by qualitatively assessing their performance in generating accurate images of human faces, groups, and specified numbers of objects but also by presenting a social bias analysis. As expected, models with larger capacity generate higher-quality images. However, we also document the inherent gender or social biases these models possess, offering a more complete understanding of their impact and limitations.
Read more7/2/2024
✨
0
TIBET: Identifying and Evaluating Biases in Text-to-Image Generative Models
Aditya Chinchure, Pushkar Shukla, Gaurav Bhatt, Kiri Salij, Kartik Hosanagar, Leonid Sigal, Matthew Turk
Text-to-Image (TTI) generative models have shown great progress in the past few years in terms of their ability to generate complex and high-quality imagery. At the same time, these models have been shown to suffer from harmful biases, including exaggerated societal biases (e.g., gender, ethnicity), as well as incidental correlations that limit such a model's ability to generate more diverse imagery. In this paper, we propose a general approach to study and quantify a broad spectrum of biases, for any TTI model and for any prompt, using counterfactual reasoning. Unlike other works that evaluate generated images on a predefined set of bias axes, our approach automatically identifies potential biases that might be relevant to the given prompt, and measures those biases. In addition, we complement quantitative scores with post-hoc explanations in terms of semantic concepts in the images generated. We show that our method is uniquely capable of explaining complex multi-dimensional biases through semantic concepts, as well as the intersectionality between different biases for any given prompt. We perform extensive user studies to illustrate that the results of our method and analysis are consistent with human judgements.
Read more7/18/2024
🛸
0
Gender Bias Evaluation in Text-to-image Generation: A Survey
Yankun Wu, Yuta Nakashima, Noa Garcia
The rapid development of text-to-image generation has brought rising ethical considerations, especially regarding gender bias. Given a text prompt as input, text-to-image models generate images according to the prompt. Pioneering models such as Stable Diffusion and DALL-E 2 have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in producing high-fidelity images from natural language prompts. However, these models often exhibit gender bias, as studied by the tendency of generating man from prompts such as a photo of a software developer. Given the widespread application and increasing accessibility of these models, bias evaluation is crucial for regulating the development of text-to-image generation. Unlike well-established metrics for evaluating image quality or fidelity, the evaluation of bias presents challenges and lacks standard approaches. Although biases related to other factors, such as skin tone, have been explored, gender bias remains the most extensively studied. In this paper, we review recent work on gender bias evaluation in text-to-image generation, involving bias evaluation setup, bias evaluation metrics, and findings and trends. We primarily focus on the evaluation of recent popular models such as Stable Diffusion, a diffusion model operating in the latent space and using CLIP text embedding, and DALL-E 2, a diffusion model leveraging Seq2Seq architectures like BART. By analyzing recent work and discussing trends, we aim to provide insights for future work.
Read more8/22/2024
🤯
0
Survey of Bias In Text-to-Image Generation: Definition, Evaluation, and Mitigation
Yixin Wan, Arjun Subramonian, Anaelia Ovalle, Zongyu Lin, Ashima Suvarna, Christina Chance, Hritik Bansal, Rebecca Pattichis, Kai-Wei Chang
The recent advancement of large and powerful models with Text-to-Image (T2I) generation abilities -- such as OpenAI's DALLE-3 and Google's Gemini -- enables users to generate high-quality images from textual prompts. However, it has become increasingly evident that even simple prompts could cause T2I models to exhibit conspicuous social bias in generated images. Such bias might lead to both allocational and representational harms in society, further marginalizing minority groups. Noting this problem, a large body of recent works has been dedicated to investigating different dimensions of bias in T2I systems. However, an extensive review of these studies is lacking, hindering a systematic understanding of current progress and research gaps. We present the first extensive survey on bias in T2I generative models. In this survey, we review prior studies on dimensions of bias: Gender, Skintone, and Geo-Culture. Specifically, we discuss how these works define, evaluate, and mitigate different aspects of bias. We found that: (1) while gender and skintone biases are widely studied, geo-cultural bias remains under-explored; (2) most works on gender and skintone bias investigated occupational association, while other aspects are less frequently studied; (3) almost all gender bias works overlook non-binary identities in their studies; (4) evaluation datasets and metrics are scattered, with no unified framework for measuring biases; and (5) current mitigation methods fail to resolve biases comprehensively. Based on current limitations, we point out future research directions that contribute to human-centric definitions, evaluations, and mitigation of biases. We hope to highlight the importance of studying biases in T2I systems, as well as encourage future efforts to holistically understand and tackle biases, building fair and trustworthy T2I technologies for everyone.
Read more5/3/2024