Anonymity at Risk? Assessing Re-Identification Capabilities of Large Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2308.11103 - Published 5/21/2024 by Alex Nyffenegger, Matthias Sturmer, Joel Niklaus

💬

Overview

The paper explores the potential for Large Language Models (LLMs) to re-identify anonymized individuals in court rulings and Wikipedia data.
Researchers constructed a proof-of-concept using data from the Swiss Federal Supreme Court and an anonymized Wikipedia dataset to investigate this issue.
The study introduces new metrics to measure the performance of re-identification and analyzes the factors that influence successful re-identifications.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at a potential privacy concern with the use of large language models. As these models become more advanced, there are growing worries that they could be used to re-identify people whose identities have been hidden or anonymized, such as in court rulings.

To explore this, the researchers built a prototype system that tried to re-identify people in real court decisions from Switzerland. They also tested it on an anonymized version of the Wikipedia dataset to see how well it performed in a more controlled setting.

The study looks at different factors that affect how well the system can re-identify people, like the size of the language model and the length of the text it's analyzing. Even the best models struggled with the court decisions, likely because there isn't much training data available and the information used for re-identification is quite sparse.

Overall, the research suggests that while re-identification using language models may not be feasible right now, it could become possible in the future as the technology improves. The hope is that this work can help courts feel more confident about publishing decisions while protecting people's privacy.

Technical Explanation

The researchers constructed a proof-of-concept system to investigate the potential for LLMs to re-identify anonymized individuals in court rulings and Wikipedia data. They started by using actual legal data from the Swiss Federal Supreme Court, then created an anonymized Wikipedia dataset as a more rigorous testing ground.

The study introduced new metrics to measure the performance of re-identification, such as the percentage of correctly re-identified individuals and the confidence scores of the predictions. The researchers systematically analyzed factors that influence successful re-identifications, including model size, input length, and instruction tuning.

Despite high re-identification rates on the Wikipedia dataset, even the best LLMs struggled with the court decisions. The researchers attribute this complexity to the lack of available test datasets, the need for substantial training resources, and the sparsity of information used for re-identification in the court rulings.

Critical Analysis

While the paper demonstrates the potential for LLMs to re-identify anonymized individuals, the researchers acknowledge that this may not be feasible in the near future, especially for complex datasets like court decisions. The lack of available training data and the inherent difficulty of the task pose significant challenges.

Additionally, the researchers note that the re-identification performance on the Wikipedia dataset, while high, may not accurately reflect the real-world challenges of working with sensitive legal data. The controlled nature of the Wikipedia dataset may not capture the nuances and complexities of actual court rulings.

Further research is needed to explore more effective strategies for protecting anonymity in court decisions and other sensitive contexts. The paper's findings suggest that continued advancements in large language models may pose a growing threat to privacy, and that more robust anonymization techniques and safeguards may be necessary to maintain the confidentiality of individuals involved in legal proceedings.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the potential for LLMs to re-identify anonymized individuals, particularly in controlled environments like the Wikipedia dataset. However, the researchers found that even the best LLMs struggled with the complexity of court decisions, likely due to the lack of available training data and the sparsity of information used for re-identification.

The paper's findings suggest that while re-identification using LLMs may not be feasible at present, the threat to privacy could grow as the technology continues to advance. The researchers hope that this work can help enhance the confidence in the security of anonymized court decisions, leading to more transparency and trust in the judicial system.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Anonymity at Risk? Assessing Re-Identification Capabilities of Large Language Models

Alex Nyffenegger, Matthias Sturmer, Joel Niklaus

Anonymity of both natural and legal persons in court rulings is a critical aspect of privacy protection in the European Union and Switzerland. With the advent of LLMs, concerns about large-scale re-identification of anonymized persons are growing. In accordance with the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, we explore the potential of LLMs to re-identify individuals in court rulings by constructing a proof-of-concept using actual legal data from the Swiss federal supreme court. Following the initial experiment, we constructed an anonymized Wikipedia dataset as a more rigorous testing ground to further investigate the findings. With the introduction and application of the new task of re-identifying people in texts, we also introduce new metrics to measure performance. We systematically analyze the factors that influence successful re-identifications, identifying model size, input length, and instruction tuning among the most critical determinants. Despite high re-identification rates on Wikipedia, even the best LLMs struggled with court decisions. The complexity is attributed to the lack of test datasets, the necessity for substantial training resources, and data sparsity in the information used for re-identification. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that re-identification using LLMs may not be feasible for now, but as the proof-of-concept on Wikipedia showed, it might become possible in the future. We hope that our system can help enhance the confidence in the security of anonymized decisions, thus leading to the courts being more confident to publish decisions.

5/21/2024

Robust Utility-Preserving Text Anonymization Based on Large Language Models

Tianyu Yang, Xiaodan Zhu, Iryna Gurevych

Text anonymization is crucial for sharing sensitive data while maintaining privacy. Existing techniques face the emerging challenges of re-identification attack ability of Large Language Models (LLMs), which have shown advanced capability in memorizing detailed information and patterns as well as connecting disparate pieces of information. In defending against LLM-based re-identification attacks, anonymization could jeopardize the utility of the resulting anonymized data in downstream tasks -- the trade-off between privacy and data utility requires deeper understanding within the context of LLMs. This paper proposes a framework composed of three LLM-based components -- a privacy evaluator, a utility evaluator, and an optimization component, which work collaboratively to perform anonymization. To provide a practical model for large-scale and real-time environments, we distill the anonymization capabilities into a lightweight model using Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed models outperform baseline models, showing robustness in reducing the risk of re-identification while preserving greater data utility in downstream tasks. Our code and dataset are available at https://github.com/UKPLab/arxiv2024-rupta.

7/17/2024

💬

Identifying and Mitigating Privacy Risks Stemming from Language Models: A Survey

Victoria Smith, Ali Shahin Shamsabadi, Carolyn Ashurst, Adrian Weller

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown greatly enhanced performance in recent years, attributed to increased size and extensive training data. This advancement has led to widespread interest and adoption across industries and the public. However, training data memorization in Machine Learning models scales with model size, particularly concerning for LLMs. Memorized text sequences have the potential to be directly leaked from LLMs, posing a serious threat to data privacy. Various techniques have been developed to attack LLMs and extract their training data. As these models continue to grow, this issue becomes increasingly critical. To help researchers and policymakers understand the state of knowledge around privacy attacks and mitigations, including where more work is needed, we present the first SoK on data privacy for LLMs. We (i) identify a taxonomy of salient dimensions where attacks differ on LLMs, (ii) systematize existing attacks, using our taxonomy of dimensions to highlight key trends, (iii) survey existing mitigation strategies, highlighting their strengths and limitations, and (iv) identify key gaps, demonstrating open problems and areas for concern.

6/19/2024

Unlocking the Potential of Large Language Models for Clinical Text Anonymization: A Comparative Study

David Pissarra, Isabel Curioso, Jo~ao Alveira, Duarte Pereira, Bruno Ribeiro, Tom'as Souper, Vasco Gomes, Andr'e V. Carreiro, Vitor Rolla

Automated clinical text anonymization has the potential to unlock the widespread sharing of textual health data for secondary usage while assuring patient privacy and safety. Despite the proposal of many complex and theoretically successful anonymization solutions in literature, these techniques remain flawed. As such, clinical institutions are still reluctant to apply them for open access to their data. Recent advances in developing Large Language Models (LLMs) pose a promising opportunity to further the field, given their capability to perform various tasks. This paper proposes six new evaluation metrics tailored to the challenges of generative anonymization with LLMs. Moreover, we present a comparative study of LLM-based methods, testing them against two baseline techniques. Our results establish LLM-based models as a reliable alternative to common approaches, paving the way toward trustworthy anonymization of clinical text.

6/4/2024