Apple Tasting: Combinatorial Dimensions and Minimax Rates

Overview

• The paper revisits the "apple tasting" problem, a classical partial-feedback setting in online binary classification.
• It provides a tight characterization of the Littlestone dimension, which quantifies the learnability in the agnostic setting.
• It introduces a new combinatorial parameter, the "Effective width," that tightly characterizes the minimax expected mistakes in the realizable setting.
• The paper establishes a "trichotomy" in the realizable setting, showing that the expected number of mistakes can be Θ(1), Θ(√T), or Θ(T), in contrast to the full-information realizable setting where only Θ(1) and Θ(T) are possible.

Plain English Explanation

In the "apple tasting" problem, an online binary classifier only observes the true label if it predicts the class "1." This is similar to a scenario where a customer only provides feedback when they choose to buy a product. The paper revisits this classical partial-feedback setting and analyzes it from a combinatorial perspective.

The key finding is that the Littlestone dimension, a well-known complexity measure, continues to characterize the learnability of this problem in the agnostic (worst-case) setting. This resolves an open question posed in previous work.

For the realizable setting (where the data follows a simple pattern), the paper introduces a new combinatorial parameter called the "Effective width." This tightly captures the minimax expected number of mistakes a learner can make. As a result, the researchers establish a "trichotomy" - they show that the expected mistakes can only be Θ(1), Θ(√T), or Θ(T), where T is the number of rounds. This is in contrast to the full-information realizable setting, where only Θ(1) and Θ(T) are possible.

This work builds on previous research in areas like real-price bandits, online ranking with top-k feedback, and two-sided assortment optimization. The new insights provide a deeper understanding of the fundamental limits of learning in partial-feedback settings.

Technical Explanation

The paper studies the "apple tasting" problem, first introduced by Helmbold and Littlestone, in the context of online binary classification. In this setting, the learner only observes the true label if it predicts the class "1." The researchers revisit this classical partial-feedback problem and analyze it from a combinatorial perspective.

They show that the Littlestone dimension, a well-established complexity measure, continues to provide a tight characterization of the learnability in the agnostic (worst-case) setting. This resolves an open question posed in the original work on apple tasting.

For the realizable setting, where the data follows a simple pattern, the researchers introduce a new combinatorial parameter called the "Effective width." They prove that this parameter tightly quantifies the minimax expected number of mistakes made by any learner. As a corollary, they establish a "trichotomy" in the realizable setting: the expected number of mistakes can be Θ(1), Θ(√T), or Θ(T), where T is the number of rounds. This is in contrast to the full-information realizable setting, where only Θ(1) and Θ(T) are possible.

The insights provided by this work contribute to a deeper understanding of the fundamental limits of learning in partial-feedback settings, building on previous research in related areas like real-price bandits, online ranking with top-k feedback, and two-sided assortment optimization.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous and insightful analysis of the "apple tasting" problem, resolving an open question from previous work and introducing a new combinatorial parameter to characterize the realizable setting. The researchers have done a thorough job in establishing the tight bounds and the trichotomy result, which deepens our understanding of learning in partial-feedback scenarios.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations or practical considerations. For example, the analysis assumes a worst-case or adversarial setting, which may not always reflect real-world scenarios. It would be interesting to see how the results might change in the presence of certain distributional assumptions or noise models.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the theoretical aspects and does not discuss potential applications or the implications of these findings for real-world problems. Further research could explore how the insights from this work could inform the design of practical learning algorithms in domains like recommendation systems, online advertising, or interactive user interfaces, where partial feedback is common.

Overall, the paper makes valuable contributions to the understanding of learning in partial-feedback settings, and the findings provide a solid foundation for future research in this area.

Conclusion

This paper revisits the classic "apple tasting" problem in online binary classification, where the learner only observes the true label if it predicts the class "1." The researchers provide a tight characterization of the Littlestone dimension, which quantifies the learnability in the agnostic setting, and introduce a new combinatorial parameter, the "Effective width," to tightly capture the minimax expected mistakes in the realizable setting.

The key insight is the establishment of a "trichotomy" in the realizable setting, showing that the expected number of mistakes can be Θ(1), Θ(√T), or Θ(T), in contrast to the full-information realizable setting where only Θ(1) and Θ(T) are possible. These findings deepen our understanding of the fundamental limits of learning in partial-feedback scenarios and provide a solid foundation for further research in this area.