ARAIDA: Analogical Reasoning-Augmented Interactive Data Annotation
2405.11912
1
0
Abstract
Human annotation is a time-consuming task that requires a significant amount of effort. To address this issue, interactive data annotation utilizes an annotation model to provide suggestions for humans to approve or correct. However, annotation models trained with limited labeled data are prone to generating incorrect suggestions, leading to extra human correction effort. To tackle this challenge, we propose Araida, an analogical reasoning-based approach that enhances automatic annotation accuracy in the interactive data annotation setting and reduces the need for human corrections. Araida involves an error-aware integration strategy that dynamically coordinates an annotation model and a k-nearest neighbors (KNN) model, giving more importance to KNN's predictions when predictions from the annotation model are deemed inaccurate. Empirical studies demonstrate that Araida is adaptable to different annotation tasks and models. On average, it reduces human correction labor by 11.02% compared to vanilla interactive data annotation methods.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces Araida, a system that aims to improve the efficiency and quality of interactive data annotation tasks by leveraging analogical reasoning.
- Araida uses language models trained on large-scale analogical reasoning data to provide suggestions and guidance to annotators, helping them make more informed and consistent decisions during the annotation process.
- The key innovation of Araida is its ability to identify and leverage relevant analogies to assist annotators, which can lead to faster and more reliable data labeling.
Plain English Explanation
Araida is a new system designed to make it easier and more accurate for people to annotate or label data, such as classifying images or transcribing text. The core idea is to use [object Object] - the ability to recognize and apply relevant comparisons or similarities - to provide helpful suggestions to the annotators.
For example, if an annotator is trying to classify a new image, Araida can draw connections to similar images the annotator has seen before and provide relevant information to guide their decision. This can help the annotator work more efficiently and make more consistent choices, leading to higher-quality labeled data.
The [object Object] that have been trained on vast amounts of data to develop strong analogical reasoning capabilities. Araida then integrates these capabilities into the interactive annotation process, assisting the human annotators and enhancing the overall workflow.
Technical Explanation
The Araida system is designed to augment interactive data annotation tasks by leveraging analogical reasoning. It does this by integrating a language model trained on large-scale analogical reasoning data into the annotation interface.
When an annotator is faced with a new data instance (e.g., an image or a text snippet), Araida analyzes the context and identifies relevant analogies from its knowledge base. It then presents these analogies to the annotator, along with information about how the analogies might inform the current annotation decision.
For example, if an annotator is classifying an image of a dog, Araida might suggest analogies to previous images of dogs the annotator has seen, highlighting key visual features or contextual cues that could help the annotator make a more accurate classification.
The authors evaluate Araida in the context of several real-world annotation tasks, such as image classification and text summarization. Their results show that the use of analogical reasoning significantly improves the efficiency and quality of the annotation process, leading to faster task completion and more consistent labeling decisions compared to a standard annotation workflow.
Critical Analysis
The Araida system presents an innovative approach to leveraging analogical reasoning to enhance interactive data annotation. By integrating language models trained on large-scale analogical data, the system is able to identify and surface relevant comparisons that can guide annotators in their decision-making.
One potential limitation of the research is the reliance on the quality and coverage of the underlying analogical reasoning knowledge base. If the language model has not been trained on a sufficiently diverse set of analogies, the system may struggle to provide useful suggestions in certain contexts. [object Object] could explore ways to expand and curate this knowledge base, or to dynamically generate analogies based on the specific annotation task and data.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential biases or limitations of the analogical reasoning approach. It is possible that the suggested analogies could inadvertently reinforce existing biases or lead to suboptimal annotation decisions in certain cases. [object Object] of using analogical reasoning in data annotation tasks would be an important area for future research.
Overall, the Araida system represents a promising step towards enhancing interactive data annotation through the use of advanced cognitive capabilities. As the field of artificial intelligence continues to progress, integrating such techniques into real-world annotation workflows could lead to significant improvements in the efficiency and quality of labeled data, with far-reaching implications for a wide range of AI applications.
Conclusion
The Araida system introduces a novel approach to interactive data annotation that leverages analogical reasoning to provide guidance and suggestions to human annotators. By tapping into the rich knowledge of language models trained on large-scale analogical data, Araida is able to identify relevant comparisons and insights that can help annotators make more informed and consistent decisions.
The authors' evaluation of Araida across several real-world annotation tasks demonstrates the potential of this approach to improve the efficiency and quality of the annotation process. As the demand for high-quality labeled data continues to grow in the field of AI, techniques like Araida could play a crucial role in streamlining and enhancing this critical data-centric workflow.
While the research presents a promising step forward, further investigation is needed to address potential limitations and biases in the analogical reasoning approach, as well as to explore ways to expand and refine the underlying knowledge base. Nonetheless, the Araida system represents an exciting development in the ongoing effort to unlock the full potential of human-AI collaboration in the creation of reliable and robust data sets.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
đ
ARN: Analogical Reasoning on Narratives
Zhivar Sourati, Filip Ilievski, Pia Sommerauer, Yifan Jiang
0
0
As a core cognitive skill that enables the transferability of information across domains, analogical reasoning has been extensively studied for both humans and computational models. However, while cognitive theories of analogy often focus on narratives and study the distinction between surface, relational, and system similarities, existing work in natural language processing has a narrower focus as far as relational analogies between word pairs. This gap brings a natural question: can state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) detect system analogies between narratives? To gain insight into this question and extend word-based relational analogies to relational system analogies, we devise a comprehensive computational framework that operationalizes dominant theories of analogy, using narrative elements to create surface and system mappings. Leveraging the interplay between these mappings, we create a binary task and benchmark for Analogical Reasoning on Narratives (ARN), covering four categories of far (cross-domain)/near (within-domain) analogies and disanalogies. We show that while all LLMs can largely recognize near analogies, even the largest ones struggle with far analogies in a zero-shot setting, with GPT4.0 scoring below random. Guiding the models through solved examples and chain-of-thought reasoning enhances their analogical reasoning ability. Yet, since even in the few-shot setting, the best model only performs halfway between random and humans, ARN opens exciting directions for computational analogical reasoners.
4/24/2024
DIRAS: Efficient LLM-Assisted Annotation of Document Relevance in Retrieval Augmented Generation
Jingwei Ni, Tobias Schimanski, Meihong Lin, Mrinmaya Sachan, Elliott Ash, Markus Leippold
0
0
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) is widely employed to ground responses to queries on domain-specific documents. But do RAG implementations leave out important information or excessively include irrelevant information? To allay these concerns, it is necessary to annotate domain-specific benchmarks to evaluate information retrieval (IR) performance, as relevance definitions vary across queries and domains. Furthermore, such benchmarks should be cost-efficiently annotated to avoid annotation selection bias. In this paper, we propose DIRAS (Domain-specific Information Retrieval Annotation with Scalability), a manual-annotation-free schema that fine-tunes open-sourced LLMs to annotate relevance labels with calibrated relevance probabilities. Extensive evaluation shows that DIRAS fine-tuned models achieve GPT-4-level performance on annotating and ranking unseen (query, document) pairs, and is helpful for real-world RAG development.
6/21/2024
Can language models learn analogical reasoning? Investigating training objectives and comparisons to human performance
Molly R. Petersen, Lonneke van der Plas
0
0
While analogies are a common way to evaluate word embeddings in NLP, it is also of interest to investigate whether or not analogical reasoning is a task in itself that can be learned. In this paper, we test several ways to learn basic analogical reasoning, specifically focusing on analogies that are more typical of what is used to evaluate analogical reasoning in humans than those in commonly used NLP benchmarks. Our experiments find that models are able to learn analogical reasoning, even with a small amount of data. We additionally compare our models to a dataset with a human baseline, and find that after training, models approach human performance.
5/6/2024
đŹ
ANALOGYKB: Unlocking Analogical Reasoning of Language Models with A Million-scale Knowledge Base
Siyu Yuan, Jiangjie Chen, Changzhi Sun, Jiaqing Liang, Yanghua Xiao, Deqing Yang
0
0
Analogical reasoning is a fundamental cognitive ability of humans. However, current language models (LMs) still struggle to achieve human-like performance in analogical reasoning tasks due to a lack of resources for model training. In this work, we address this gap by proposing ANALOGYKB, a million-scale analogy knowledge base (KB) derived from existing knowledge graphs (KGs). ANALOGYKB identifies two types of analogies from the KGs: 1) analogies of the same relations, which can be directly extracted from the KGs, and 2) analogies of analogous relations, which are identified with a selection and filtering pipeline enabled by large language models (LLMs), followed by minor human efforts for data quality control. Evaluations on a series of datasets of two analogical reasoning tasks (analogy recognition and generation) demonstrate that ANALOGYKB successfully enables both smaller LMs and LLMs to gain better analogical reasoning capabilities.
5/20/2024