Asymptotically Unbiased Synthetic Control Methods by Distribution Matching

Overview

• Synthetic Control Methods (SCMs) are a crucial tool for comparative case studies
• SCMs estimate the counterfactual outcomes of a treated unit using a weighted sum of untreated units
• Accurate synthetic control (SC) estimation is critical for evaluating treatment effects
• Existing SCMs suffer from an endogeneity problem, where the outcomes of untreated units are correlated with the error term of the SC

Plain English Explanation

Synthetic Control Methods (SCMs) are a way to estimate what would have happened if a certain policy or intervention had not been implemented. The idea is to create a "synthetic" control group by combining data from multiple untreated units (e.g., regions or companies) to serve as a comparison to the treated unit (e.g., the region or company that received the policy). This allows researchers to estimate the counterfactual – what would have happened if the policy had not been implemented.

The accuracy of the synthetic control (SC) is crucial for evaluating the impact of the policy intervention. However, the researchers found that existing SCMs suffer from an endogeneity problem – there is a correlation between the outcomes of the untreated units and the error term of the synthetic control. This means the estimated treatment effect may be biased.

To address this, the researchers propose a new SCM based on density matching. They assume the density of outcomes for the treated unit can be approximated by a weighted average of the joint density of untreated units (a mixture model). By matching the moments of the treated outcomes with the weighted sum of moments of untreated outcomes, they can estimate the SC weights.

This new method has three key advantages over existing SCMs:

1. It is asymptotically unbiased under the mixture model assumption
2. It can reduce the mean squared error in counterfactual predictions
3. It generates full densities of the treatment effect, not just expected values, which expands the usefulness of SCMs

Technical Explanation

The researchers start by pointing out that existing Synthetic Control Methods (SCMs) suffer from an endogeneity problem – the outcomes of untreated units are correlated with the error term of the synthetic control (SC), leading to bias in the treatment effect estimator.

To address this, the researchers propose a novel SCM based on density matching. They assume the density of outcomes for the treated unit can be approximated by a weighted average of the joint density of untreated units (i.e., a mixture model). They then estimate the SC weights by matching the moments of the treated outcomes with the weighted sum of moments of untreated outcomes.

This new method has three key advantages:

1. The estimator is asymptotically unbiased under the mixture model assumption.
2. The asymptotic unbiasedness allows for reduced mean squared error in counterfactual predictions.
3. The method generates full densities of the treatment effect, not just expected values, expanding the applicability of SCMs.

The researchers provide experimental results to demonstrate the effectiveness of their proposed method.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that their proposed method relies on the assumption of a mixture model, which may not always hold in practice. Additionally, they do not explore the performance of their method under various data-generating processes or in the presence of other potential sources of bias, such as confounding.

It would be valuable for the researchers to conduct further simulations and empirical tests to understand the robustness of their method and its limitations. Additionally, they could explore ways to relax the mixture model assumption or provide guidance on how to assess its validity in a given context.

Overall, the proposed density-matching SCM is an interesting and potentially useful contribution to the literature. However, more work is needed to fully understand its strengths, weaknesses, and the conditions under which it outperforms existing SCM approaches.

Conclusion

The researchers have presented a novel Synthetic Control Method (SCM) that addresses the endogeneity problem in existing SCMs. By assuming a mixture model for the density of treated unit outcomes, their method can produce asymptotically unbiased estimates of treatment effects and generate full densities of the treatment effect, rather than just expected values.

This expanded capability of SCMs could be valuable for researchers and policymakers seeking to rigorously evaluate the impacts of interventions. However, the method's reliance on the mixture model assumption and the need for further testing of its robustness suggest that more work is needed before it can be widely adopted.

Overall, this research represents an important step forward in improving the statistical foundations and practical applicability of Synthetic Control Methods, a crucial tool for comparative case studies.