Automata Extraction from Transformers

Read original: arXiv:2406.05564 - Published 6/11/2024 by Yihao Zhang, Zeming Wei, Meng Sun
Total Score

0

Automata Extraction from Transformers

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper investigates the ability of transformer-based language models, such as BERT, to learn and represent formal automata.
  • The researchers develop a method to extract explicit finite-state automata from the internal representations of these models.
  • They demonstrate that transformer models can learn to represent complex automata, challenging the common perception that they are primarily pattern matchers.

Plain English Explanation

Transformer models like BERT have become incredibly powerful at processing and generating human language. However, there's an ongoing debate about how these models truly work under the hood - are they just pattern matchers, or can they learn more complex representations?

This paper tackles that question by looking at how transformer models can learn to represent formal automata - mathematical models that describe sequences of states and transitions, similar to simple computer programs. The researchers developed a way to extract these automata directly from the internal workings of transformer models like BERT.

Their results show that transformer models can indeed learn to represent quite complex automata, challenging the idea that they are just pattern matching. This suggests these models may have deeper reasoning capabilities than previously thought, and could open up new applications in areas like program synthesis and reinforcement learning.

Technical Explanation

The researchers start by providing a formal definition of finite-state automata and how they can be used to describe language patterns. They then introduce a method for extracting these automata from the internal representations of transformer models.

The key insight is that the attention mechanism in transformers, which learns patterns in the input data, can be seen as analogous to the transitions in a finite-state automaton. By analyzing the attention weights, the researchers are able to reconstruct the states and transitions of an automaton that the model has learned.

They apply this technique to several popular transformer models, including BERT, and show that the extracted automata can accurately describe complex language patterns. For example, they find that BERT can learn an automaton that recognizes palindromes, a task that requires keeping track of state in a non-trivial way.

The researchers also explore the implications of this finding, suggesting that it could lead to more efficient model architectures and new applications in areas like program synthesis and reinforcement learning.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling argument that transformer models can learn to represent complex formal automata, challenging the common perception of them as simple pattern matchers. The researchers' method for extracting these automata from the model internals is technically sound and the results are convincing.

However, it's important to note that the paper focuses on a limited set of tasks and model architectures. It's unclear how well the automata extraction technique would scale to larger, more complex transformer models, or how it would perform on a wider range of language understanding tasks.

Additionally, the paper doesn't address potential limitations or caveats of this approach. For example, it's not clear how robust the extracted automata are to changes in the input data or model fine-tuning. There may also be concerns around the interpretability and explainability of these automata, and how they relate to the overall decision-making process of the transformer model.

Further research is needed to fully understand the implications of this work and its broader applicability. Nonetheless, this paper represents an important step forward in understanding the inner workings of transformer-based language models and their potential for more sophisticated reasoning capabilities.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates that transformer-based language models, such as BERT, can learn to represent complex formal automata in their internal representations. This challenges the common perception of these models as primarily pattern matchers and suggests they may have deeper reasoning capabilities.

The researchers' method for extracting these automata from the model internals provides a new tool for understanding and interpreting the behavior of transformer models. This could lead to more efficient model architectures, as well as new applications in areas like program synthesis and reinforcement learning.

While more research is needed to fully explore the implications of this work, it represents an important advancement in our understanding of transformer-based language models and their potential for more sophisticated language understanding and reasoning.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Automata Extraction from Transformers
Total Score

0

Automata Extraction from Transformers

Yihao Zhang, Zeming Wei, Meng Sun

In modern machine (ML) learning systems, Transformer-based architectures have achieved milestone success across a broad spectrum of tasks, yet understanding their operational mechanisms remains an open problem. To improve the transparency of ML systems, automata extraction methods, which interpret stateful ML models as automata typically through formal languages, have proven effective for explaining the mechanism of recurrent neural networks (RNNs). However, few works have been applied to this paradigm to Transformer models. In particular, understanding their processing of formal languages and identifying their limitations in this area remains unexplored. In this paper, we propose an automata extraction algorithm specifically designed for Transformer models. Treating the Transformer model as a black-box system, we track the model through the transformation process of their internal latent representations during their operations, and then use classical pedagogical approaches like L* algorithm to interpret them as deterministic finite-state automata (DFA). Overall, our study reveals how the Transformer model comprehends the structure of formal languages, which not only enhances the interpretability of the Transformer-based ML systems but also marks a crucial step toward a deeper understanding of how ML systems process formal languages. Code and data are available at https://github.com/Zhang-Yihao/Transfomer2DFA.

Read more

6/11/2024

Automata-based constraints for language model decoding
Total Score

0

Automata-based constraints for language model decoding

Terry Koo, Frederick Liu, Luheng He

LMs are often expected to generate strings in some formal language; for example, structured data, API calls, or code snippets. Although LMs can be tuned to improve their adherence to formal syntax, this does not guarantee conformance, especially with smaller LMs suitable for large-scale deployment. In addition, tuning requires significant resources, making it impractical for uncommon or task-specific formats. To prevent downstream parsing errors we would ideally constrain the LM to only produce valid output, but this is severely complicated by tokenization, which is typically both ambiguous and misaligned with the formal grammar. We solve these issues through the application of automata theory, deriving an efficient closed-form solution for the regular languages, a broad class of formal languages with many practical applications, including API calls or schema-guided JSON and YAML. We also discuss pragmatic extensions for coping with the issue of high branching factor. Finally, we extend our techniques to deterministic context-free languages, which similarly admit an efficient closed-form solution. In spite of its flexibility and representative power, our approach only requires access to per-token decoding logits and lowers into simple calculations that are independent of LM size, making it both efficient and easy to apply to almost any LM architecture.

Read more

7/15/2024

📊

Total Score

0

Representing Rule-based Chatbots with Transformers

Dan Friedman, Abhishek Panigrahi, Danqi Chen

Transformer-based chatbots can conduct fluent, natural-sounding conversations, but we have limited understanding of the mechanisms underlying their behavior. Prior work has taken a bottom-up approach to understanding Transformers by constructing Transformers for various synthetic and formal language tasks, such as regular expressions and Dyck languages. However, it is not obvious how to extend this approach to understand more naturalistic conversational agents. In this work, we take a step in this direction by constructing a Transformer that implements the ELIZA program, a classic, rule-based chatbot. ELIZA illustrates some of the distinctive challenges of the conversational setting, including both local pattern matching and long-term dialog state tracking. We build on constructions from prior work -- in particular, for simulating finite-state automata -- showing how simpler constructions can be composed and extended to give rise to more sophisticated behavior. Next, we train Transformers on a dataset of synthetically generated ELIZA conversations and investigate the mechanisms the models learn. Our analysis illustrates the kinds of mechanisms these models tend to prefer -- for example, models favor an induction head mechanism over a more precise, position based copying mechanism; and using intermediate generations to simulate recurrent data structures, like ELIZA's memory mechanisms. Overall, by drawing an explicit connection between neural chatbots and interpretable, symbolic mechanisms, our results offer a new setting for mechanistic analysis of conversational agents.

Read more

7/16/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

What Formal Languages Can Transformers Express? A Survey

Lena Strobl, William Merrill, Gail Weiss, David Chiang, Dana Angluin

As transformers have gained prominence in natural language processing, some researchers have investigated theoretically what problems they can and cannot solve, by treating problems as formal languages. Exploring such questions can help clarify the power of transformers relative to other models of computation, their fundamental capabilities and limits, and the impact of architectural choices. Work in this subarea has made considerable progress in recent years. Here, we undertake a comprehensive survey of this work, documenting the diverse assumptions that underlie different results and providing a unified framework for harmonizing seemingly contradictory findings.

Read more

9/5/2024