On the Automated Processing of User Feedback
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the automated processing of user feedback for software development and requirements engineering.
- It discusses the usefulness of user feedback and the challenges in effectively leveraging it.
- The paper proposes a framework for automated processing of user feedback, including techniques for feedback extraction, classification, and summarization.
- The proposed approach is evaluated through case studies and experiments, demonstrating its effectiveness in extracting valuable insights from user feedback.
Plain English Explanation
User feedback is incredibly valuable for software development teams, as it provides direct insights into how customers are using the product and what improvements they would like to see. However, manually processing and analyzing large volumes of user feedback can be a time-consuming and challenging task. This paper presents a framework for automating the processing of user feedback, making it easier for developers to extract and act on this important information.
The key idea is to leverage natural language processing (NLP) techniques to automatically extract, categorize, and summarize user feedback. For example, the system might be able to identify common themes or issues raised by users, or even classify feedback as related to specific product features or functional requirements. This can help development teams quickly identify and prioritize the most important user needs and pain points.
The researchers evaluated their framework using real-world case studies and experiments, demonstrating its effectiveness in extracting valuable insights from user feedback. This could be particularly useful for software companies that receive large volumes of user feedback through channels like app stores, customer support, or user forums. By automating the processing of this feedback, developers can spend more time actually addressing user needs rather than just trying to sift through all the data.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a framework for the automated processing of user feedback, consisting of three main components: feedback extraction, feedback classification, and feedback summarization.
Feedback Extraction: The first step is to extract relevant user feedback from various sources, such as app store reviews, customer support tickets, or online forums. The researchers used a combination of techniques, including keyword matching and natural language processing, to identify and extract user comments and feedback.
Feedback Classification: Once the feedback is extracted, the system then classifies it according to different attributes, such as sentiment (positive, negative, or neutral), topic (e.g., product features, user experience, or technical issues), and actionability (e.g., whether the feedback suggests a specific improvement or requirement).
Feedback Summarization: Finally, the classified feedback is summarized to provide developers with a concise overview of the key issues and insights. This includes techniques like topic modeling and text summarization to identify the most important themes and extract the most salient points.
The researchers evaluated their framework using case studies and experiments, demonstrating its ability to effectively process and extract valuable information from large volumes of user feedback. For example, they showed how the system could identify common user complaints about specific product features and group them into actionable themes.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed framework for automating the processing of user feedback, and the case studies and experiments provide a solid evaluation of its effectiveness. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
Generalizability: The paper primarily focuses on case studies from the software development and requirements engineering domains. It would be interesting to see how well the framework performs in other industries or contexts where user feedback is also important, such as marketing, customer service, or product management.
-
Accuracy and Reliability: While the paper demonstrates the framework's ability to effectively extract and categorize user feedback, it does not provide a detailed analysis of the accuracy and reliability of its classification and summarization capabilities. Further evaluation and validation of these components would be valuable.
-
User Interaction: The paper does not address how the automated feedback processing system might be integrated into the existing workflows and decision-making processes of software development teams. Exploring ways to seamlessly incorporate the insights from the system into the development lifecycle could be a fruitful area for future research.
-
Ethical Considerations: As with any AI-powered system, there are potential ethical concerns around the automated processing of user feedback, such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the transparency of the decision-making process. The paper could have addressed these issues more explicitly.
Overall, the paper presents a promising approach to the automated processing of user feedback, with potential benefits for software development and other domains. By continuing to refine and expand the framework, researchers and practitioners can help organizations more effectively leverage the valuable insights hidden within user feedback.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a framework for the automated processing of user feedback, which can help software development teams and other organizations more effectively extract and act on valuable insights from their users. The proposed approach combines techniques for feedback extraction, classification, and summarization, and has been evaluated through case studies and experiments.
The framework has the potential to save time and resources by automating the processing of large volumes of user feedback, allowing development teams to focus on addressing the most important user needs and requirements. While the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of the approach, there are also opportunities for further research and refinement, particularly in terms of generalizability, accuracy, user interaction, and ethical considerations.
As organizations continue to collect and analyze user feedback, tools and techniques like the one presented in this paper will become increasingly important for transforming that feedback into meaningful insights and actionable improvements.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
On the Automated Processing of User Feedback
Walid Maalej, Volodymyr Biryuk, Jialiang Wei, Fabian Panse
User feedback is becoming an increasingly important source of information for requirements engineering, user interface design, and software engineering in general. Nowadays, user feedback is largely available and easily accessible in social media, product forums, or app stores. Over the last decade, research has shown that user feedback can help software teams: a) better understand how users are actually using specific product features and components, b) faster identify, reproduce, and fix defects, and b) get inspirations for improvements or new features. However, to tap the full potential of feedback, there are two main challenges that need to be solved. First, software vendors must cope with a large quantity of feedback data, which is hard to manage manually. Second, vendors must also cope with a varying quality of feedback as some items might be uninformative, repetitive, or simply wrong. This chapter summarises and pipelines various data mining, machine learning, and natural language processing techniques, including recent Large Language Models, to cope with the quantity and quality challenges. We guide researchers and practitioners through implementing effective, actionable analysis of user feedback for software and requirements engineering.
Read more7/23/2024
0
Learning from Naturally Occurring Feedback
Shachar Don-Yehiya, Leshem Choshen, Omri Abend
Human feedback data is a critical component in developing language models. However, collecting this feedback is costly and ultimately not scalable. We propose a scalable method for extracting feedback that users naturally include when interacting with chat models, and leveraging it for model training. We are further motivated by previous work that showed there are also qualitative advantages to using naturalistic (rather than auto-generated) feedback, such as less hallucinations and biases. We manually annotated conversation data to confirm the presence of naturally occurring feedback in a standard corpus, finding that as much as 30% of the chats include explicit feedback. We apply our method to over 1M conversations to obtain hundreds of thousands of feedback samples. Training with the extracted feedback shows significant performance improvements over baseline models, demonstrating the efficacy of our approach in enhancing model alignment to human preferences.
Read more7/16/2024
📶
0
The Future of Open Human Feedback
Shachar Don-Yehiya, Ben Burtenshaw, Ramon Fernandez Astudillo, Cailean Osborne, Mimansa Jaiswal, Tzu-Sheng Kuo, Wenting Zhao, Idan Shenfeld, Andi Peng, Mikhail Yurochkin, Atoosa Kasirzadeh, Yangsibo Huang, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Yacine Jernite, Daniel Vila-Suero, Omri Abend, Jennifer Ding, Sara Hooker, Hannah Rose Kirk, Leshem Choshen
Human feedback on conversations with language language models (LLMs) is central to how these systems learn about the world, improve their capabilities, and are steered toward desirable and safe behaviors. However, this feedback is mostly collected by frontier AI labs and kept behind closed doors. In this work, we bring together interdisciplinary experts to assess the opportunities and challenges to realizing an open ecosystem of human feedback for AI. We first look for successful practices in peer production, open source, and citizen science communities. We then characterize the main challenges for open human feedback. For each, we survey current approaches and offer recommendations. We end by envisioning the components needed to underpin a sustainable and open human feedback ecosystem. In the center of this ecosystem are mutually beneficial feedback loops, between users and specialized models, incentivizing a diverse stakeholders community of model trainers and feedback providers to support a general open feedback pool.
Read more9/5/2024
🛠️
0
NewsUnfold: Creating a News-Reading Application That Indicates Linguistic Media Bias and Collects Feedback
Smi Hinterreiter, Martin Wessel, Fabian Schliski, Isao Echizen, Marc Erich Latoschik, Timo Spinde
Media bias is a multifaceted problem, leading to one-sided views and impacting decision-making. A way to address digital media bias is to detect and indicate it automatically through machine-learning methods. However, such detection is limited due to the difficulty of obtaining reliable training data. Human-in-the-loop-based feedback mechanisms have proven an effective way to facilitate the data-gathering process. Therefore, we introduce and test feedback mechanisms for the media bias domain, which we then implement on NewsUnfold, a news-reading web application to collect reader feedback on machine-generated bias highlights within online news articles. Our approach augments dataset quality by significantly increasing inter-annotator agreement by 26.31% and improving classifier performance by 2.49%. As the first human-in-the-loop application for media bias, the feedback mechanism shows that a user-centric approach to media bias data collection can return reliable data while being scalable and evaluated as easy to use. NewsUnfold demonstrates that feedback mechanisms are a promising strategy to reduce data collection expenses and continuously update datasets to changes in context.
Read more7/30/2024