Learning from Naturally Occurring Feedback
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how machine learning systems can learn from "naturally occurring feedback" - the kind of feedback that humans naturally provide during interactions, rather than carefully curated feedback.
- The authors present a framework for incorporating this type of feedback into machine learning models, with the goal of improving the models' performance and alignment with human preferences.
- The paper discusses the challenges and opportunities around leveraging naturally occurring feedback, and presents several case studies demonstrating the approach on different tasks.
Plain English Explanation
When humans interact with machine learning systems, they often provide all kinds of feedback - not just the carefully crafted feedback that researchers might design, but the natural, off-the-cuff comments and reactions that come up spontaneously. This paper on learning from naturally occurring feedback explores ways to harness that natural feedback to help improve the systems.
The key idea is that by paying attention to the little comments, reactions, and signals that humans give during normal interactions, machine learning models can pick up on valuable cues about what humans like, dislike, find confusing, or want to see more of. This feedback might not be as clean or curated as what researchers design, but it's a more authentic reflection of how humans really feel.
The authors propose a framework for incorporating this "naturally occurring feedback" into the training and fine-tuning of machine learning models. They show how this approach can lead to systems that are better aligned with human preferences and perform better on real-world tasks, compared to models trained only on the more artificial feedback.
Overall, the idea is to make machine learning systems more in tune with the natural ways humans communicate, rather than just optimizing for narrow, predefined feedback signals. By tapping into the genuine reactions people have during interactions, the systems can learn and adapt in more human-centric ways.
Technical Explanation
This paper introduces a framework for learning from naturally occurring feedback - the spontaneous, off-the-cuff comments and reactions that humans provide during their interactions with machine learning systems.
The authors argue that while most machine learning research focuses on carefully curated feedback signals, there is valuable information to be gleaned from the natural, unstructured feedback that arises organically. They present a general formulation for incorporating this "naturally occurring feedback" into the training and fine-tuning of models, with the goal of improving their performance and alignment with human preferences.
The paper explores several case studies applying this approach, including dialogue systems, recommendation engines, and language models. In each case, the authors demonstrate how leveraging the naturally occurring feedback - things like clarifying questions, affective responses, and off-hand comments - can lead to models that are more attuned to human needs and preferences.
The key technical innovations include methods for identifying and extracting relevant feedback signals from noisy interaction data, as well as techniques for efficiently incorporating that feedback into the learning process. The authors also address challenges around data sparsity, feedback noise, and alignment of objectives.
Overall, this work offers a promising new direction for making machine learning systems more responsive to the natural ways humans communicate, with potential applications across a wide range of interactive domains.
Critical Analysis
The authors make a compelling case for the value of learning from naturally occurring feedback, highlighting how it can lead to more human-centric and effective machine learning models. The case studies provide convincing demonstrations of the approach's potential.
However, the paper also acknowledges several key challenges and limitations. Extracting meaningful signals from noisy, unstructured feedback data is inherently difficult, and the authors note that careful techniques are required to avoid issues like feedback noise and misalignment of objectives.
Additionally, the paper does not deeply explore potential downsides or unintended consequences of this approach. For example, there are open questions around the ethical implications of systems that closely mimic and adapt to human biases and preferences, rather than maintaining more principled, abstract objectives.
Further research is also needed to better understand the generalizability of the framework across different domains and tasks. The case studies demonstrate initial successes, but more comprehensive evaluations would be valuable to assess the broader applicability and limitations of learning from naturally occurring feedback.
Overall, this work represents an important step forward in making machine learning systems more responsive to human needs and preferences. By tapping into the natural ways humans communicate, the approach holds promise for advancing the field towards more human-centric and aligned AI. However, continued critical examination of the implications and further refinement of the technical methods will be crucial as this area of research evolves.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel framework for learning from naturally occurring feedback - the spontaneous comments, reactions, and signals that humans provide during their interactions with machine learning systems.
The key insight is that this organic, unstructured feedback contains valuable information that can be leveraged to improve model performance and alignment with human preferences, beyond what can be gleaned from carefully curated feedback signals.
The authors demonstrate the potential of this approach through several case studies, showing how it can enhance the capabilities of dialogue systems, recommendation engines, and language models. At the same time, they acknowledge the technical challenges involved in extracting meaningful signals from noisy data and aligning model objectives with human feedback.
Overall, this work represents an important step forward in making machine learning systems more responsive to natural human communication. By tapping into the authentic ways people interact, the proposed framework holds promise for advancing the field towards more human-centric and aligned AI. Continued refinement and critical examination of the implications will be crucial as this research area evolves.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Learning from Naturally Occurring Feedback
Shachar Don-Yehiya, Leshem Choshen, Omri Abend
Human feedback data is a critical component in developing language models. However, collecting this feedback is costly and ultimately not scalable. We propose a scalable method for extracting feedback that users naturally include when interacting with chat models, and leveraging it for model training. We are further motivated by previous work that showed there are also qualitative advantages to using naturalistic (rather than auto-generated) feedback, such as less hallucinations and biases. We manually annotated conversation data to confirm the presence of naturally occurring feedback in a standard corpus, finding that as much as 30% of the chats include explicit feedback. We apply our method to over 1M conversations to obtain hundreds of thousands of feedback samples. Training with the extracted feedback shows significant performance improvements over baseline models, demonstrating the efficacy of our approach in enhancing model alignment to human preferences.
Read more7/16/2024
💬
0
UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedback
Ganqu Cui, Lifan Yuan, Ning Ding, Guanming Yao, Bingxiang He, Wei Zhu, Yuan Ni, Guotong Xie, Ruobing Xie, Yankai Lin, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun
Learning from human feedback has become a pivot technique in aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. However, acquiring vast and premium human feedback is bottlenecked by time, labor, and human capability, resulting in small sizes or limited topics of current datasets. This further hinders feedback learning as well as alignment research within the open-source community. To address this issue, we explore how to go beyond human feedback and collect high-quality textit{AI feedback} automatically for a scalable alternative. Specifically, we identify textbf{scale and diversity} as the key factors for feedback data to take effect. Accordingly, we first broaden instructions and responses in both amount and breadth to encompass a wider range of user-assistant interactions. Then, we meticulously apply a series of techniques to mitigate annotation biases for more reliable AI feedback. We finally present textsc{UltraFeedback}, a large-scale, high-quality, and diversified AI feedback dataset, which contains over 1 million GPT-4 feedback for 250k user-assistant conversations from various aspects. Built upon textsc{UltraFeedback}, we align a LLaMA-based model by best-of-$n$ sampling and reinforcement learning, demonstrating its exceptional performance on chat benchmarks. Our work validates the effectiveness of scaled AI feedback data in constructing strong open-source chat language models, serving as a solid foundation for future feedback learning research. Our data and models are available at https://github.com/thunlp/UltraFeedback.
Read more7/17/2024
0
On the Automated Processing of User Feedback
Walid Maalej, Volodymyr Biryuk, Jialiang Wei, Fabian Panse
User feedback is becoming an increasingly important source of information for requirements engineering, user interface design, and software engineering in general. Nowadays, user feedback is largely available and easily accessible in social media, product forums, or app stores. Over the last decade, research has shown that user feedback can help software teams: a) better understand how users are actually using specific product features and components, b) faster identify, reproduce, and fix defects, and b) get inspirations for improvements or new features. However, to tap the full potential of feedback, there are two main challenges that need to be solved. First, software vendors must cope with a large quantity of feedback data, which is hard to manage manually. Second, vendors must also cope with a varying quality of feedback as some items might be uninformative, repetitive, or simply wrong. This chapter summarises and pipelines various data mining, machine learning, and natural language processing techniques, including recent Large Language Models, to cope with the quantity and quality challenges. We guide researchers and practitioners through implementing effective, actionable analysis of user feedback for software and requirements engineering.
Read more7/23/2024
📶
0
The Future of Open Human Feedback
Shachar Don-Yehiya, Ben Burtenshaw, Ramon Fernandez Astudillo, Cailean Osborne, Mimansa Jaiswal, Tzu-Sheng Kuo, Wenting Zhao, Idan Shenfeld, Andi Peng, Mikhail Yurochkin, Atoosa Kasirzadeh, Yangsibo Huang, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Yacine Jernite, Daniel Vila-Suero, Omri Abend, Jennifer Ding, Sara Hooker, Hannah Rose Kirk, Leshem Choshen
Human feedback on conversations with language language models (LLMs) is central to how these systems learn about the world, improve their capabilities, and are steered toward desirable and safe behaviors. However, this feedback is mostly collected by frontier AI labs and kept behind closed doors. In this work, we bring together interdisciplinary experts to assess the opportunities and challenges to realizing an open ecosystem of human feedback for AI. We first look for successful practices in peer production, open source, and citizen science communities. We then characterize the main challenges for open human feedback. For each, we survey current approaches and offer recommendations. We end by envisioning the components needed to underpin a sustainable and open human feedback ecosystem. In the center of this ecosystem are mutually beneficial feedback loops, between users and specialized models, incentivizing a diverse stakeholders community of model trainers and feedback providers to support a general open feedback pool.
Read more9/5/2024