Automating Customer Needs Analysis: A Comparative Study of Large Language Models in the Travel Industry

Read original: arXiv:2404.17975 - Published 4/30/2024 by Simone Barandoni, Filippo Chiarello, Lorenzo Cascone, Emiliano Marrale, Salvatore Puccio
Total Score

0

💬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This study investigates the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for extracting customer needs from online travel reviews on TripAdvisor.
  • The researchers compared the performance of various LLMs, including open-source and proprietary models like GPT-4 and Gemini, in accurately identifying and summarizing customer needs.
  • They evaluated the models using metrics such as BERTScore, ROUGE, and BLEU, and found that open-source LLMs, particularly Mistral 7B, can achieve comparable performance to larger closed models while offering more affordability and customization benefits.
  • The study highlights the importance of considering factors like model size, resource requirements, and performance metrics when selecting the most suitable LLM for customer needs analysis tasks in the travel industry.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models, which are powerful AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data, have become widely used for a variety of tasks, such as extracting valuable insights from textual data. In this study, the researchers looked at how well these models can be used to understand the needs and preferences of travelers based on their reviews on a website like TripAdvisor.

The researchers tested and compared the performance of different large language models, both open-source (freely available) and proprietary (available for a fee), to see which ones were best at accurately identifying and summarizing the key points from the traveler reviews. They used various evaluation metrics, like BERTScore, ROUGE, and BLEU, to measure how well each model did at this task.

Interestingly, the researchers found that one of the open-source models, called Mistral 7B, was able to perform just as well as the larger, more expensive proprietary models, like GPT-4 and Gemini. This suggests that businesses looking to analyze customer needs in the travel industry may be able to use these more affordable open-source models and still get high-quality results.

The study also emphasizes the importance of carefully considering factors like the model's size, the resources required to use it, and the specific performance metrics that are most relevant when choosing the right large language model for a particular task. This can help ensure that businesses select the most suitable model for their needs, whether that's an open-source or proprietary option.

Technical Explanation

This study conducted a comparative analysis of large language models (LLMs) for the task of extracting travel customer needs from TripAdvisor reviews. The researchers leveraged a diverse range of models, including both open-source and proprietary ones such as GPT-4 and Gemini, to investigate their strengths and weaknesses in this specialized domain.

To evaluate the performance of the LLMs, the researchers used several metrics, including BERTScore, ROUGE, and BLEU. These metrics assess the models' ability to accurately identify and summarize the key customer needs expressed in the review text.

The findings of the study highlight the strong performance of the open-source Mistral 7B model, which was able to achieve comparable results to the larger, proprietary LLMs. This suggests that businesses in the travel industry may be able to leverage the affordability and customization benefits of open-source models like Mistral 7B, while still obtaining high-quality customer needs analysis.

The researchers also emphasize the importance of considering various factors, such as model size, resource requirements, and performance metrics, when selecting the most suitable LLM for customer needs analysis tasks. This can help ensure that the chosen model aligns with the specific requirements and constraints of the business.

Critical Analysis

The study provides valuable insights into the performance of LLMs for the extraction of travel customer needs, but it also acknowledges some limitations and areas for further research.

One potential limitation is the scope of the review data used in the study, as it focuses solely on TripAdvisor reviews. It would be interesting to see how the LLMs perform on a more diverse set of travel-related data sources, such as social media posts, hotel booking websites, or airline customer feedback.

Additionally, the study does not delve into the specific types of customer needs that the models were able to identify and summarize. It would be helpful to understand the nuances of the models' performance, such as their ability to capture different categories of needs (e.g., service, amenities, value) or to handle more complex or context-dependent requests.

Furthermore, the study could be strengthened by exploring the interpretability and explainability of the LLM-based customer needs analysis. Understanding the reasoning behind the models' outputs and their potential biases or limitations could provide valuable insights for practitioners in the travel industry.

Despite these potential areas for further research, the study's findings on the strong performance of the open-source Mistral 7B model are quite compelling and could have significant implications for enhancing legal compliance and regulation analysis using large language models in the travel industry.

Conclusion

This study provides a comparative analysis of large language models (LLMs) for the extraction of travel customer needs from online reviews. The researchers found that open-source LLMs, particularly Mistral 7B, can achieve comparable performance to larger proprietary models while offering more affordable and customizable solutions.

The study highlights the importance of considering various factors, such as model size, resource requirements, and performance metrics, when selecting the most suitable LLM for customer needs analysis tasks in the travel industry. These insights could help businesses leverage advanced natural language processing techniques to enhance customer experience and drive operational efficiency.

Overall, the findings of this research contribute valuable knowledge to the ongoing efforts to advance the capabilities of large language models and their application in specialized domains like the travel industry.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Total Score

0

Automating Customer Needs Analysis: A Comparative Study of Large Language Models in the Travel Industry

Simone Barandoni, Filippo Chiarello, Lorenzo Cascone, Emiliano Marrale, Salvatore Puccio

In the rapidly evolving landscape of Natural Language Processing (NLP), Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for many tasks, such as extracting valuable insights from vast amounts of textual data. In this study, we conduct a comparative analysis of LLMs for the extraction of travel customer needs from TripAdvisor posts. Leveraging a diverse range of models, including both open-source and proprietary ones such as GPT-4 and Gemini, we aim to elucidate their strengths and weaknesses in this specialized domain. Through an evaluation process involving metrics such as BERTScore, ROUGE, and BLEU, we assess the performance of each model in accurately identifying and summarizing customer needs. Our findings highlight the efficacy of opensource LLMs, particularly Mistral 7B, in achieving comparable performance to larger closed models while offering affordability and customization benefits. Additionally, we underscore the importance of considering factors such as model size, resource requirements, and performance metrics when selecting the most suitable LLM for customer needs analysis tasks. Overall, this study contributes valuable insights for businesses seeking to leverage advanced NLP techniques to enhance customer experience and drive operational efficiency in the travel industry.

Read more

4/30/2024

👀

Total Score

0

Investigating LLM Applications in E-Commerce

Chester Palen-Michel, Ruixiang Wang, Yipeng Zhang, David Yu, Canran Xu, Zhe Wu

The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has revolutionized natural language processing in various applications especially in e-commerce. One crucial step before the application of such LLMs in these fields is to understand and compare the performance in different use cases in such tasks. This paper explored the efficacy of LLMs in the e-commerce domain, focusing on instruction-tuning an open source LLM model with public e-commerce datasets of varying sizes and comparing the performance with the conventional models prevalent in industrial applications. We conducted a comprehensive comparison between LLMs and traditional pre-trained language models across specific tasks intrinsic to the e-commerce domain, namely classification, generation, summarization, and named entity recognition (NER). Furthermore, we examined the effectiveness of the current niche industrial application of very large LLM, using in-context learning, in e-commerce specific tasks. Our findings indicate that few-shot inference with very large LLMs often does not outperform fine-tuning smaller pre-trained models, underscoring the importance of task-specific model optimization.Additionally, we investigated different training methodologies such as single-task training, mixed-task training, and LoRA merging both within domain/tasks and between different tasks. Through rigorous experimentation and analysis, this paper offers valuable insights into the potential effectiveness of LLMs to advance natural language processing capabilities within the e-commerce industry.

Read more

8/26/2024

Large Language Models: A New Approach for Privacy Policy Analysis at Scale
Total Score

0

Large Language Models: A New Approach for Privacy Policy Analysis at Scale

David Rodriguez, Ian Yang, Jose M. Del Alamo, Norman Sadeh

The number and dynamic nature of web and mobile applications presents significant challenges for assessing their compliance with data protection laws. In this context, symbolic and statistical Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques have been employed for the automated analysis of these systems' privacy policies. However, these techniques typically require labor-intensive and potentially error-prone manually annotated datasets for training and validation. This research proposes the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) as an alternative for effectively and efficiently extracting privacy practices from privacy policies at scale. Particularly, we leverage well-known LLMs such as ChatGPT and Llama 2, and offer guidance on the optimal design of prompts, parameters, and models, incorporating advanced strategies such as few-shot learning. We further illustrate its capability to detect detailed and varied privacy practices accurately. Using several renowned datasets in the domain as a benchmark, our evaluation validates its exceptional performance, achieving an F1 score exceeding 93%. Besides, it does so with reduced costs, faster processing times, and fewer technical knowledge requirements. Consequently, we advocate for LLM-based solutions as a sound alternative to traditional NLP techniques for the automated analysis of privacy policies at scale.

Read more

6/3/2024

💬

Total Score

0

The emergence of Large Language Models (LLM) as a tool in literature reviews: an LLM automated systematic review

Dmitry Scherbakov, Nina Hubig, Vinita Jansari, Alexander Bakumenko, Leslie A. Lenert

Objective: This study aims to summarize the usage of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the process of creating a scientific review. We look at the range of stages in a review that can be automated and assess the current state-of-the-art research projects in the field. Materials and Methods: The search was conducted in June 2024 in PubMed, Scopus, Dimensions, and Google Scholar databases by human reviewers. Screening and extraction process took place in Covidence with the help of LLM add-on which uses OpenAI gpt-4o model. ChatGPT was used to clean extracted data and generate code for figures in this manuscript, ChatGPT and Scite.ai were used in drafting all components of the manuscript, except the methods and discussion sections. Results: 3,788 articles were retrieved, and 172 studies were deemed eligible for the final review. ChatGPT and GPT-based LLM emerged as the most dominant architecture for review automation (n=126, 73.2%). A significant number of review automation projects were found, but only a limited number of papers (n=26, 15.1%) were actual reviews that used LLM during their creation. Most citations focused on automation of a particular stage of review, such as Searching for publications (n=60, 34.9%), and Data extraction (n=54, 31.4%). When comparing pooled performance of GPT-based and BERT-based models, the former were better in data extraction with mean precision 83.0% (SD=10.4), and recall 86.0% (SD=9.8), while being slightly less accurate in title and abstract screening stage (Maccuracy=77.3%, SD=13.0). Discussion/Conclusion: Our LLM-assisted systematic review revealed a significant number of research projects related to review automation using LLMs. The results looked promising, and we anticipate that LLMs will change in the near future the way the scientific reviews are conducted.

Read more

9/10/2024