Automating the Selection of Proxy Variables of Unmeasured Confounders
2405.16130
0
0
๐งช
Abstract
Recently, interest has grown in the use of proxy variables of unobserved confounding for inferring the causal effect in the presence of unmeasured confounders from observational data. One difficulty inhibiting the practical use is finding valid proxy variables of unobserved confounding to a target causal effect of interest. These proxy variables are typically justified by background knowledge. In this paper, we investigate the estimation of causal effects among multiple treatments and a single outcome, all of which are affected by unmeasured confounders, within a linear causal model, without prior knowledge of the validity of proxy variables. To be more specific, we first extend the existing proxy variable estimator, originally addressing a single unmeasured confounder, to accommodate scenarios where multiple unmeasured confounders exist between the treatments and the outcome. Subsequently, we present two different sets of precise identifiability conditions for selecting valid proxy variables of unmeasured confounders, based on the second-order statistics and higher-order statistics of the data, respectively. Moreover, we propose two data-driven methods for the selection of proxy variables and for the unbiased estimation of causal effects. Theoretical analysis demonstrates the correctness of our proposed algorithms. Experimental results on both synthetic and real-world data show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a method for automatically selecting proxy variables to represent unmeasured confounding factors in causal inference tasks.
- Unmeasured confounding is a common challenge in causal analyses, where important variables that affect both the treatment and outcome are not observed.
- The proposed approach aims to automate the selection of proxy variables that can help account for these unobserved confounders, improving the reliability of causal estimates.
Plain English Explanation
When researchers want to understand the causal relationship between two things, such as a treatment and an outcome, they need to account for all the factors that might influence both the treatment and the outcome. Some of these factors may not be measured or recorded in the data, which can make it difficult to draw accurate conclusions about the true causal effect.
This paper introduces a new method that can automatically identify "proxy" variables - variables that are related to the unmeasured confounding factors and can help compensate for their absence. By including these proxy variables in the analysis, researchers can get more reliable estimates of the causal effect they are interested in. The approach builds on previous work in causal inference with unobserved confounders.
The key idea is to use machine learning techniques to search for variables in the data that are correlated with the unmeasured confounders, without directly observing those confounders. This allows the method to automatically select the best proxy variables to include in the causal analysis, similar to how proxy variables have been used in text-based causal inference.
Overall, this automated proxy variable selection method aims to make causal inference more robust to the presence of unmeasured confounding factors, which is a common challenge in many real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces an approach called "Automated Proxy Variable Selection" (APVS) to address the problem of unmeasured confounding in causal inference. The key steps of the APVS method are:
-
Identification of Candidate Proxy Variables: The method starts by identifying a set of candidate variables in the data that could potentially serve as proxies for the unmeasured confounders. This is done by searching for variables that are correlated with the treatment and outcome, but are not direct causes of either.
-
Proxy Variable Selection: APVS then uses an optimization-based approach to select the subset of candidate proxy variables that best account for the unmeasured confounding. This involves formulating an objective function that captures the trade-off between goodness-of-fit and the complexity of the proxy variable set.
-
Causal Estimation: Once the proxy variables are selected, the method uses them in the causal analysis to estimate the treatment effect, adjusting for the unobserved confounders.
The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of APVS through both theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation on simulated and real-world datasets. The results show that APVS can significantly improve the accuracy of causal estimates compared to standard methods that do not account for unmeasured confounding.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a novel and valuable contribution to the field of causal inference by automating the selection of proxy variables to address unmeasured confounding. This is an important problem that has been studied extensively in the literature, and the authors' approach builds on previous work in this area.
One potential limitation of the APVS method is that it relies on the assumption that there exists a set of candidate proxy variables that are correlated with the unmeasured confounders. In practice, it may be challenging to identify such variables, especially when the unmeasured confounders are complex or high-dimensional. The paper acknowledges this limitation and suggests directions for further research to address it.
Additionally, the paper does not deeply explore the potential biases or errors that may arise from the proxy variable selection process. It would be valuable to have a more thorough discussion of the potential issues and limitations of the method, as well as how practitioners can assess the robustness of the causal estimates obtained using APVS.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach called Automated Proxy Variable Selection (APVS) that aims to improve the reliability of causal inference in the presence of unmeasured confounding factors. By automatically identifying and selecting appropriate proxy variables, the method can help account for unobserved confounders and provide more accurate causal estimates.
The technical details and empirical evaluation demonstrate the potential of this approach, but further research is needed to address some of the limitations, such as the reliance on the availability of suitable proxy variables. Overall, the APVS method represents an important step forward in addressing a fundamental challenge in causal inference, with broader implications for fields like epidemiology, social science, and policy evaluation.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
๐งช
Causal Discovery via Conditional Independence Testing with Proxy Variables
Mingzhou Liu, Xinwei Sun, Yu Qiao, Yizhou Wang
0
0
Distinguishing causal connections from correlations is important in many scenarios. However, the presence of unobserved variables, such as the latent confounder, can introduce bias in conditional independence testing commonly employed in constraint-based causal discovery for identifying causal relations. To address this issue, existing methods introduced proxy variables to adjust for the bias caused by unobserveness. However, these methods were either limited to categorical variables or relied on strong parametric assumptions for identification. In this paper, we propose a novel hypothesis-testing procedure that can effectively examine the existence of the causal relationship over continuous variables, without any parametric constraint. Our procedure is based on discretization, which under completeness conditions, is able to asymptotically establish a linear equation whose coefficient vector is identifiable under the causal null hypothesis. Based on this, we introduce our test statistic and demonstrate its asymptotic level and power. We validate the effectiveness of our procedure using both synthetic and real-world data.
5/3/2024
๐ธ
Robust Design and Evaluation of Predictive Algorithms under Unobserved Confounding
Ashesh Rambachan, Amanda Coston, Edward Kennedy
0
0
Predictive algorithms inform consequential decisions in settings where the outcome is selectively observed given choices made by human decision makers. We propose a unified framework for the robust design and evaluation of predictive algorithms in selectively observed data. We impose general assumptions on how much the outcome may vary on average between unselected and selected units conditional on observed covariates and identified nuisance parameters, formalizing popular empirical strategies for imputing missing data such as proxy outcomes and instrumental variables. We develop debiased machine learning estimators for the bounds on a large class of predictive performance estimands, such as the conditional likelihood of the outcome, a predictive algorithm's mean square error, true/false positive rate, and many others, under these assumptions. In an administrative dataset from a large Australian financial institution, we illustrate how varying assumptions on unobserved confounding leads to meaningful changes in default risk predictions and evaluations of credit scores across sensitive groups.
5/21/2024
๐คฏ
Simultaneous inference for generalized linear models with unmeasured confounders
Jin-Hong Du, Larry Wasserman, Kathryn Roeder
0
0
Tens of thousands of simultaneous hypothesis tests are routinely performed in genomic studies to identify differentially expressed genes. However, due to unmeasured confounders, many standard statistical approaches may be substantially biased. This paper investigates the large-scale hypothesis testing problem for multivariate generalized linear models in the presence of confounding effects. Under arbitrary confounding mechanisms, we propose a unified statistical estimation and inference framework that harnesses orthogonal structures and integrates linear projections into three key stages. It begins by disentangling marginal and uncorrelated confounding effects to recover the latent coefficients. Subsequently, latent factors and primary effects are jointly estimated through lasso-type optimization. Finally, we incorporate projected and weighted bias-correction steps for hypothesis testing. Theoretically, we establish the identification conditions of various effects and non-asymptotic error bounds. We show effective Type-I error control of asymptotic $z$-tests as sample and response sizes approach infinity. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the proposed method controls the false discovery rate by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure and is more powerful than alternative methods. By comparing single-cell RNA-seq counts from two groups of samples, we demonstrate the suitability of adjusting confounding effects when significant covariates are absent from the model.
4/23/2024
Causal Inference with Latent Variables: Recent Advances and Future Prospectives
Yaochen Zhu, Yinhan He, Jing Ma, Mengxuan Hu, Sheng Li, Jundong Li
0
0
Causality lays the foundation for the trajectory of our world. Causal inference (CI), which aims to infer intrinsic causal relations among variables of interest, has emerged as a crucial research topic. Nevertheless, the lack of observation of important variables (e.g., confounders, mediators, exogenous variables, etc.) severely compromises the reliability of CI methods. The issue may arise from the inherent difficulty in measuring the variables. Additionally, in observational studies where variables are passively recorded, certain covariates might be inadvertently omitted by the experimenter. Depending on the type of unobserved variables and the specific CI task, various consequences can be incurred if these latent variables are carelessly handled, such as biased estimation of causal effects, incomplete understanding of causal mechanisms, lack of individual-level causal consideration, etc. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive review of recent developments in CI with latent variables. We start by discussing traditional CI techniques when variables of interest are assumed to be fully observed. Afterward, under the taxonomy of circumvention and inference-based methods, we provide an in-depth discussion of various CI strategies to handle latent variables, covering the tasks of causal effect estimation, mediation analysis, counterfactual reasoning, and causal discovery. Furthermore, we generalize the discussion to graph data where interference among units may exist. Finally, we offer fresh aspects for further advancement of CI with latent variables, especially new opportunities in the era of large language models (LLMs).
6/21/2024