Autonomous Sparse Mean-CVaR Portfolio Optimization

Read original: arXiv:2405.08047 - Published 5/15/2024 by Yizun Lin, Yangyu Zhang, Zhao-Rong Lai, Cheng Li
Total Score

0

Autonomous Sparse Mean-CVaR Portfolio Optimization

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Presents an autonomous and sparse Mean-Conditional Value-at-Risk (Mean-CVaR) portfolio optimization approach
  • Aims to construct optimal investment portfolios that balance expected return and downside risk
  • Leverages sparse optimization techniques to automatically select a small number of high-performing assets

Plain English Explanation

This research paper proposes a new method for managing investment portfolios that aims to maximize expected returns while minimizing the risk of large losses. The approach uses an advanced mathematical technique called Mean-CVaR optimization to find the best combination of assets to include in the portfolio.

The key innovation is that the method automatically selects only a small number of high-performing assets to include, rather than considering all possible options. This "sparse" optimization helps to simplify the portfolio and make it easier to manage, while still achieving good financial performance.

The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through experiments using real-world financial data. They show that the autonomous Mean-CVaR portfolios outperform traditional portfolio optimization methods in terms of both expected return and risk reduction.

This work could have important implications for individual investors, financial advisors, and fund managers who are looking to construct investment portfolios that are optimized for both return and risk. By automating the asset selection process, the approach has the potential to make portfolio management more efficient and accessible.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents an autonomous sparse Mean-CVaR portfolio optimization approach. Mean-CVaR is a popular risk measure that captures both the expected return and the potential for large losses. The researchers leverage sparse optimization techniques to automatically select a small subset of high-performing assets to include in the portfolio.

Specifically, the authors formulate the portfolio optimization problem as a sparse regularized Mean-CVaR minimization task. They develop an efficient algorithm to solve this problem, which yields a sparse portfolio that balances expected return and downside risk.

Through numerical experiments on real-world financial data, the researchers demonstrate that their autonomous Mean-CVaR portfolios outperform traditional portfolio optimization methods in terms of both return and risk. The sparse structure of the optimized portfolios also provides benefits in terms of interpretability and ease of implementation.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and well-designed approach to portfolio optimization that addresses important practical considerations. The use of Mean-CVaR as the objective function is well-justified, as it provides a more comprehensive risk measure than traditional mean-variance optimization.

The sparse optimization aspect is also a key strength, as it can help to simplify portfolio construction and management. However, the authors acknowledge that the approach may not be suitable for all investment scenarios, especially those with highly correlated assets or complex market dynamics.

Additionally, while the experimental results are promising, the researchers only evaluate the method on historical data. Further testing on out-of-sample data or in live investment scenarios would be necessary to fully assess the real-world performance and robustness of the approach.

It would also be interesting to see how the autonomous Mean-CVaR portfolios compare to other risk-averse learning methods or optimization-based collision avoidance techniques in the context of portfolio management.

Conclusion

The Autonomous Sparse Mean-CVaR Portfolio Optimization approach presented in this paper offers a promising new method for constructing investment portfolios that balance expected return and downside risk. By leveraging sparse optimization techniques, the method can automatically select a small number of high-performing assets, simplifying portfolio management while still achieving strong financial performance.

The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through experiments on real-world data, and the work has the potential to benefit individual investors, financial advisors, and fund managers who are seeking to optimize their portfolios. Further research and real-world testing could help to refine and expand the application of this novel optimization-based technique in the domain of portfolio management.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Autonomous Sparse Mean-CVaR Portfolio Optimization
Total Score

0

Autonomous Sparse Mean-CVaR Portfolio Optimization

Yizun Lin, Yangyu Zhang, Zhao-Rong Lai, Cheng Li

The $ell_0$-constrained mean-CVaR model poses a significant challenge due to its NP-hard nature, typically tackled through combinatorial methods characterized by high computational demands. From a markedly different perspective, we propose an innovative autonomous sparse mean-CVaR portfolio model, capable of approximating the original $ell_0$-constrained mean-CVaR model with arbitrary accuracy. The core idea is to convert the $ell_0$ constraint into an indicator function and subsequently handle it through a tailed approximation. We then propose a proximal alternating linearized minimization algorithm, coupled with a nested fixed-point proximity algorithm (both convergent), to iteratively solve the model. Autonomy in sparsity refers to retaining a significant portion of assets within the selected asset pool during adjustments in pool size. Consequently, our framework offers a theoretically guaranteed approximation of the $ell_0$-constrained mean-CVaR model, improving computational efficiency while providing a robust asset selection scheme.

Read more

5/15/2024

Robust portfolio optimization for recommender systems considering uncertainty of estimated statistics
Total Score

0

Robust portfolio optimization for recommender systems considering uncertainty of estimated statistics

Tomoya Yanagi, Shunnosuke Ikeda, Yuichi Takano

This paper is concerned with portfolio optimization models for creating high-quality lists of recommended items to balance the accuracy and diversity of recommendations. However, the statistics (i.e., expectation and covariance of ratings) required for mean--variance portfolio optimization are subject to inevitable estimation errors. To remedy this situation, we focus on robust optimization techniques that derive reliable solutions to uncertain optimization problems. Specifically, we propose a robust portfolio optimization model that copes with the uncertainty of estimated statistics based on the cardinality-based uncertainty sets. This robust portfolio optimization model can be reduced to a mixed-integer linear optimization problem, which can be solved exactly using mathematical optimization solvers. Experimental results using two publicly available rating datasets demonstrate that our method can improve not only the recommendation accuracy but also the diversity of recommendations compared with conventional mean--variance portfolio optimization models. Notably, our method has the potential to improve the recommendation quality of various rating prediction algorithms.

Read more

6/18/2024

Probabilistic Iterative Hard Thresholding for Sparse Learning
Total Score

0

Probabilistic Iterative Hard Thresholding for Sparse Learning

Matteo Bergamaschi, Andrea Cristofari, Vyacheslav Kungurtsev, Francesco Rinaldi

For statistical modeling wherein the data regime is unfavorable in terms of dimensionality relative to the sample size, finding hidden sparsity in the ground truth can be critical in formulating an accurate statistical model. The so-called l0 norm which counts the number of non-zero components in a vector, is a strong reliable mechanism of enforcing sparsity when incorporated into an optimization problem. However, in big data settings wherein noisy estimates of the gradient must be evaluated out of computational necessity, the literature is scant on methods that reliably converge. In this paper we present an approach towards solving expectation objective optimization problems with cardinality constraints. We prove convergence of the underlying stochastic process, and demonstrate the performance on two Machine Learning problems.

Read more

9/4/2024

🖼️

Total Score

0

Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection in Long-Term Investments with Unknown Distribution: Online Estimation, Risk Aversion under Ambiguity, and Universality of Algorithms

Duy Khanh Lam

The standard approach for constructing a Mean-Variance portfolio involves estimating parameters for the model using collected samples. However, since the distribution of future data may not resemble that of the training set, the out-of-sample performance of the estimated portfolio is worse than one derived with true parameters, which has prompted several innovations for better estimation. Instead of treating the data without a timing aspect as in the common training-backtest approach, this paper adopts a perspective where data gradually and continuously reveal over time. The original model is recast into an online learning framework, which is free from any statistical assumptions, to propose a dynamic strategy of sequential portfolios such that its empirical utility, Sharpe ratio, and growth rate asymptotically achieve those of the true portfolio, derived with perfect knowledge of the future data. When the distribution of future data has a normal shape, the growth rate of wealth is shown to increase by lifting the portfolio along the efficient frontier through the calibration of risk aversion. Since risk aversion cannot be appropriately predetermined, another proposed algorithm updating this coefficient over time forms a dynamic strategy approaching the optimal empirical Sharpe ratio or growth rate associated with the true coefficient. The performance of these proposed strategies is universally guaranteed under specific stochastic markets. Furthermore, in stationary and ergodic markets, the so-called Bayesian strategy utilizing true conditional distributions, based on observed past market information during investment, almost surely does not perform better than the proposed strategies in terms of empirical utility, Sharpe ratio, or growth rate, which, in contrast, do not rely on conditional distributions.

Read more

6/21/2024