Backdoor Attack in Prompt-Based Continual Learning

Read original: arXiv:2406.19753 - Published 7/1/2024 by Trang Nguyen, Anh Tran, Nhat Ho
Total Score

0

Backdoor Attack in Prompt-Based Continual Learning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a backdoor attack on prompt-based continual learning, which is a technique used in machine learning to update models with new information over time without forgetting previous knowledge.
  • The attack involves injecting a hidden trigger into the training data, causing the model to exhibit a specific behavior when the trigger is present during inference.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this attack on various continual learning benchmarks and discuss its implications for the security of such systems.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes a way to secretly sabotage machine learning models that are designed to continuously learn new information without forgetting what they've already learned. This is done by embedding a hidden "trigger" into the data used to train the model. When the model is later exposed to this trigger, it will produce a specific, unintended output, even if the model has been trained on a wide variety of tasks.

The authors show that this backdoor attack can be successful across different continual learning benchmarks, which are datasets used to test how well machine learning models can adapt to new information over time. This raises concerns about the security of these types of continual learning systems, as they may be vulnerable to hidden manipulation that could cause them to behave in unexpected and potentially harmful ways.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a backdoor attack on prompt-based continual learning models, which are designed to update themselves with new information without forgetting previous knowledge. The attack involves embedding a hidden "trigger" into the training data, causing the model to exhibit a specific, unintended behavior when the trigger is present during inference.

The authors evaluate their attack on various continual learning benchmarks, including AOP, LLM, Federated, and Defense. They demonstrate the effectiveness of the attack in terms of its success rate, the imperceptibility of the trigger, and the model's ability to retain its original functionality.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough investigation of the backdoor attack and its implications for the security of continual learning systems. However, the authors acknowledge that their attack may be challenging to execute in practice, as it requires access to the training data and the ability to manipulate it without being detected.

Additionally, the paper does not explore potential defenses against this type of attack, which would be an important area for future research. The authors also note that their attack may be limited to certain types of continual learning architectures and tasks, and further work is needed to understand the broader applicability of the technique.

Conclusion

This paper presents a significant threat to the security of prompt-based continual learning systems, which are becoming increasingly important in a wide range of applications. The ability to secretly manipulate these models through a backdoor attack raises concerns about their reliability and trustworthiness, and highlights the need for continued research into robust defenses against such attacks. As the field of machine learning continues to evolve, it will be crucial to address these security challenges to ensure the safe and responsible deployment of these powerful technologies.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Backdoor Attack in Prompt-Based Continual Learning
Total Score

0

Backdoor Attack in Prompt-Based Continual Learning

Trang Nguyen, Anh Tran, Nhat Ho

Prompt-based approaches offer a cutting-edge solution to data privacy issues in continual learning, particularly in scenarios involving multiple data suppliers where long-term storage of private user data is prohibited. Despite delivering state-of-the-art performance, its impressive remembering capability can become a double-edged sword, raising security concerns as it might inadvertently retain poisoned knowledge injected during learning from private user data. Following this insight, in this paper, we expose continual learning to a potential threat: backdoor attack, which drives the model to follow a desired adversarial target whenever a specific trigger is present while still performing normally on clean samples. We highlight three critical challenges in executing backdoor attacks on incremental learners and propose corresponding solutions: (1) emph{Transferability}: We employ a surrogate dataset and manipulate prompt selection to transfer backdoor knowledge to data from other suppliers; (2) emph{Resiliency}: We simulate static and dynamic states of the victim to ensure the backdoor trigger remains robust during intense incremental learning processes; and (3) emph{Authenticity}: We apply binary cross-entropy loss as an anti-cheating factor to prevent the backdoor trigger from devolving into adversarial noise. Extensive experiments across various benchmark datasets and continual learners validate our continual backdoor framework, achieving up to $100%$ attack success rate, with further ablation studies confirming our contributions' effectiveness.

Read more

7/1/2024

Persistent Backdoor Attacks in Continual Learning
Total Score

0

Persistent Backdoor Attacks in Continual Learning

Zhen Guo, Abhinav Kumar, Reza Tourani

Backdoor attacks pose a significant threat to neural networks, enabling adversaries to manipulate model outputs on specific inputs, often with devastating consequences, especially in critical applications. While backdoor attacks have been studied in various contexts, little attention has been given to their practicality and persistence in continual learning, particularly in understanding how the continual updates to model parameters, as new data distributions are learned and integrated, impact the effectiveness of these attacks over time. To address this gap, we introduce two persistent backdoor attacks-Blind Task Backdoor and Latent Task Backdoor-each leveraging minimal adversarial influence. Our blind task backdoor subtly alters the loss computation without direct control over the training process, while the latent task backdoor influences only a single task's training, with all other tasks trained benignly. We evaluate these attacks under various configurations, demonstrating their efficacy with static, dynamic, physical, and semantic triggers. Our results show that both attacks consistently achieve high success rates across different continual learning algorithms, while effectively evading state-of-the-art defenses, such as SentiNet and I-BAU.

Read more

9/24/2024

Backdoor Defense through Self-Supervised and Generative Learning
Total Score

0

Backdoor Defense through Self-Supervised and Generative Learning

Ivan Saboli'c, Ivan Grubiv{s}i'c, Siniv{s}a v{S}egvi'c

Backdoor attacks change a small portion of training data by introducing hand-crafted triggers and rewiring the corresponding labels towards a desired target class. Training on such data injects a backdoor which causes malicious inference in selected test samples. Most defenses mitigate such attacks through various modifications of the discriminative learning procedure. In contrast, this paper explores an approach based on generative modelling of per-class distributions in a self-supervised representation space. Interestingly, these representations get either preserved or heavily disturbed under recent backdoor attacks. In both cases, we find that per-class generative models allow to detect poisoned data and cleanse the dataset. Experiments show that training on cleansed dataset greatly reduces the attack success rate and retains the accuracy on benign inputs.

Read more

9/4/2024

Exploiting the Vulnerability of Large Language Models via Defense-Aware Architectural Backdoor
Total Score

0

Exploiting the Vulnerability of Large Language Models via Defense-Aware Architectural Backdoor

Abdullah Arafat Miah, Yu Bi

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have long been recognized as vulnerable to backdoor attacks. By providing poisoned training data in the fine-tuning process, the attacker can implant a backdoor into the victim model. This enables input samples meeting specific textual trigger patterns to be classified as target labels of the attacker's choice. While such black-box attacks have been well explored in both computer vision and natural language processing (NLP), backdoor attacks relying on white-box attack philosophy have hardly been thoroughly investigated. In this paper, we take the first step to introduce a new type of backdoor attack that conceals itself within the underlying model architecture. Specifically, we propose to design separate backdoor modules consisting of two functions: trigger detection and noise injection. The add-on modules of model architecture layers can detect the presence of input trigger tokens and modify layer weights using Gaussian noise to disturb the feature distribution of the baseline model. We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate our attack methods using two model architecture settings on five different large language datasets. We demonstrate that the training-free architectural backdoor on a large language model poses a genuine threat. Unlike the-state-of-art work, it can survive the rigorous fine-tuning and retraining process, as well as evade output probability-based defense methods (i.e. BDDR). All the code and data is available https://github.com/SiSL-URI/Arch_Backdoor_LLM.

Read more

9/10/2024