BERT's Conceptual Cartography: Mapping the Landscapes of Meaning

Read original: arXiv:2408.07190 - Published 8/15/2024 by Nina Haket, Ryan Daniels
Total Score

0

BERT's Conceptual Cartography: Mapping the Landscapes of Meaning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Explores how the BERT language model represents conceptual knowledge and meaning
  • Analyzes the semantic and relational structure of BERT's internal representations
  • Provides insights into the conceptual landscape captured by this influential AI system

Plain English Explanation

The paper examines how the BERT language model, a widely-used AI system, represents and organizes conceptual knowledge and meaning. BERT is a powerful model that can understand and generate human language, but its inner workings are complex.

This research aims to map the "conceptual landscape" captured by BERT - to understand how it organizes different concepts and the relationships between them. By probing BERT's internal representations, the researchers gain insights into the model's conceptual understanding and how it processes meaning.

The findings provide a window into the "landscapes of meaning" encoded within this influential AI system, potentially shedding light on how language models build conceptual representations and use conceptual metaphors to understand the world.

Technical Explanation

The researchers use a range of techniques to analyze the conceptual representations within BERT. They apply dimensionality reduction methods to visualize the high-dimensional semantic space captured by the model. This allows them to map out the "conceptual landscape" - the relative positions and relationships between different concepts.

Additionally, the team probes BERT's internal representations to understand how it encodes and organizes conceptual knowledge. They examine the model's ability to reason about concepts and their attributes, as well as the relational structures it learns between different concepts.

The analysis provides insights into the conceptual understanding captured by BERT, shedding light on how this influential language model builds meaning-based representations of the world.

Critical Analysis

The paper offers a valuable contribution by providing a detailed examination of the conceptual landscape encoded within BERT. However, it is important to note that the findings are specific to this particular language model and may not necessarily generalize to other AI systems or human cognition.

While the techniques used to analyze BERT's representations are rigorous, the researchers acknowledge that there may be limitations in their ability to fully capture the nuances and complexities of the model's conceptual understanding. Further research may be needed to explore these aspects in greater depth.

Additionally, the paper does not address potential biases or inconsistencies that may be present in BERT's conceptual representations, which could have important implications for the model's performance and applications. Examining these issues could be an important area for future work.

Conclusion

This research provides a comprehensive exploration of the conceptual landscape encoded within the influential BERT language model. By mapping the semantic and relational structures of BERT's internal representations, the study offers valuable insights into the model's understanding of meaning and knowledge.

The findings have the potential to inform the development of more robust and interpretable language models, as well as contribute to our broader understanding of how artificial intelligence systems represent and reason about concepts. As language models continue to play an increasingly important role in our lives, studies like this one can help us better comprehend the conceptual underpinnings of these powerful AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

BERT's Conceptual Cartography: Mapping the Landscapes of Meaning
Total Score

0

BERT's Conceptual Cartography: Mapping the Landscapes of Meaning

Nina Haket, Ryan Daniels

Conceptual Engineers want to make words better. However, they often underestimate how varied our usage of words is. In this paper, we take the first steps in exploring the contextual nuances of words by creating conceptual landscapes -- 2D surfaces representing the pragmatic usage of words -- that conceptual engineers can use to inform their projects. We use the spoken component of the British National Corpus and BERT to create contextualised word embeddings, and use Gaussian Mixture Models, a selection of metrics, and qualitative analysis to visualise and numerically represent lexical landscapes. Such an approach has not yet been used in the conceptual engineering literature and provides a detailed examination of how different words manifest in various contexts that is potentially useful to conceptual engineering projects. Our findings highlight the inherent complexity of conceptual engineering, revealing that each word exhibits a unique and intricate landscape. Conceptual Engineers cannot, therefore, use a one-size-fits-all approach when improving words -- a task that may be practically intractable at scale.

Read more

8/15/2024

Total Score

0

Conceptual Mapping of Controversies

Claude Draude, Dominik Durrschnabel, Johannes Hirth, Viktoria Horn, Jonathan Kropf, Jorn Lamla, Gerd Stumme, Markus Uhlmann

With our work, we contribute towards a qualitative analysis of the discourse on controversies in online news media. For this, we employ Formal Concept Analysis and the economics of conventions to derive conceptual controversy maps. In our experiments, we analyze two maps from different news journals with methods from ordinal data science. We show how these methods can be used to assess the diversity, complexity and potential bias of controversies. In addition to that, we discuss how the diagrams of concept lattices can be used to navigate between news articles.

Read more

5/1/2024

Exploring Spatial Representations in the Historical Lake District Texts with LLM-based Relation Extraction
Total Score

0

Exploring Spatial Representations in the Historical Lake District Texts with LLM-based Relation Extraction

Erum Haris, Anthony G. Cohn, John G. Stell

Navigating historical narratives poses a challenge in unveiling the spatial intricacies of past landscapes. The proposed work addresses this challenge within the context of the English Lake District, employing the Corpus of the Lake District Writing. The method utilizes a generative pre-trained transformer model to extract spatial relations from the textual descriptions in the corpus. The study applies this large language model to understand the spatial dimensions inherent in historical narratives comprehensively. The outcomes are presented as semantic triples, capturing the nuanced connections between entities and locations, and visualized as a network, offering a graphical representation of the spatial narrative. The study contributes to a deeper comprehension of the English Lake District's spatial tapestry and provides an approach to uncovering spatial relations within diverse historical contexts.

Read more

6/21/2024

🤔

Total Score

0

Probing Conceptual Understanding of Large Visual-Language Models

Madeline Schiappa, Raiyaan Abdullah, Shehreen Azad, Jared Claypoole, Michael Cogswell, Ajay Divakaran, Yogesh Rawat

In recent years large visual-language (V+L) models have achieved great success in various downstream tasks. However, it is not well studied whether these models have a conceptual grasp of the visual content. In this work we focus on conceptual understanding of these large V+L models. To facilitate this study, we propose novel benchmarking datasets for probing three different aspects of content understanding, 1) textit{relations}, 2) textit{composition}, and 3) textit{context}. Our probes are grounded in cognitive science and help determine if a V+L model can, for example, determine if snow garnished with a man is implausible, or if it can identify beach furniture by knowing it is located on a beach. We experimented with many recent state-of-the-art V+L models and observe that these models mostly textit{fail to demonstrate} a conceptual understanding. This study reveals several interesting insights such as that textit{cross-attention} helps learning conceptual understanding, and that CNNs are better with textit{texture and patterns}, while Transformers are better at textit{color and shape}. We further utilize some of these insights and investigate a textit{simple finetuning technique} that rewards the three conceptual understanding measures with promising initial results. The proposed benchmarks will drive the community to delve deeper into conceptual understanding and foster advancements in the capabilities of large V+L models. The code and dataset is available at: url{https://tinyurl.com/vlm-robustness}

Read more

4/29/2024