Conceptual Mapping of Controversies
0
ā
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of conceptual mapping to analyze controversies in online discussions.
- The researchers developed a framework to identify and visualize the underlying concepts and relationships that shape controversial topics.
- The paper demonstrates the application of this approach to the context of online news article recommendations, where controversies can significantly impact user experience and platform engagement.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a technique called "conceptual mapping" that can be used to better understand controversial topics. Conceptual mapping involves identifying the key ideas, beliefs, and relationships that underlie a controversial issue. By creating a visual "map" of these concepts, researchers can gain insights into how different viewpoints and arguments are structured and connected.
The researchers applied this conceptual mapping approach to the domain of news article recommendations. In online platforms that suggest articles to users, controversies and differing opinions on certain topics can significantly impact how people engage with the content. By using conceptual mapping, the researchers aimed to uncover the complex dynamics that contribute to these controversies, with the goal of improving the design and implementation of news recommendation systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a framework for conceptual mapping of controversies, which involves several key steps:
- Identifying key concepts and beliefs that are central to the controversy.
- Mapping the relationships and connections between these concepts, using techniques like knowledge graph representation.
- Analyzing the emotional and rhetorical elements that contribute to the polarization of views on the issue.
The researchers demonstrated the application of this framework in the context of news article recommendations, where controversies can significantly impact user engagement and platform design. By mapping the conceptual landscape of these controversies, the researchers aimed to provide insights that could inform the development of more nuanced and effective recommendation systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling approach to understanding the complex dynamics of online controversies, but it does acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research:
- The conceptual mapping technique relies on the analysis of textual data, which may not capture all the nuances and nonverbal cues that contribute to controversial discussions.
- The framework was tested in a specific domain (news article recommendations), and its applicability to other types of online controversies may require further validation.
- The study focused on analyzing the conceptual structure of controversies, but did not directly address the challenges of designing recommendation systems that effectively navigate these complex landscapes.
Additionally, further research could explore the potential biases and ethical considerations inherent in the conceptual mapping approach, particularly when applied to sensitive or high-stakes topics.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel framework for conceptual mapping of controversies, demonstrating its potential value in the context of news article recommendations. By uncovering the underlying concepts, relationships, and emotional drivers that shape controversial discussions, the researchers aim to provide insights that can inform the design of more nuanced and effective recommendation systems.
The conceptual mapping approach offers a promising avenue for deepening our understanding of online controversies and their impact on user engagement and platform dynamics. As these issues continue to evolve, further research in this area could yield valuable insights for a wide range of applications, from social media to e-commerce and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
ā
0
Conceptual Mapping of Controversies
Claude Draude, Dominik Durrschnabel, Johannes Hirth, Viktoria Horn, Jonathan Kropf, Jorn Lamla, Gerd Stumme, Markus Uhlmann
With our work, we contribute towards a qualitative analysis of the discourse on controversies in online news media. For this, we employ Formal Concept Analysis and the economics of conventions to derive conceptual controversy maps. In our experiments, we analyze two maps from different news journals with methods from ordinal data science. We show how these methods can be used to assess the diversity, complexity and potential bias of controversies. In addition to that, we discuss how the diagrams of concept lattices can be used to navigate between news articles.
Read more5/1/2024
šØāš«
0
Connecting the Dots in News Analysis: Bridging the Cross-Disciplinary Disparities in Media Bias and Framing
Gisela Vallejo, Timothy Baldwin, Lea Frermann
The manifestation and effect of bias in news reporting have been central topics in the social sciences for decades, and have received increasing attention in the NLP community recently. While NLP can help to scale up analyses or contribute automatic procedures to investigate the impact of biased news in society, we argue that methodologies that are currently dominant fall short of addressing the complex questions and effects addressed in theoretical media studies. In this survey paper, we review social science approaches and draw a comparison with typical task formulations, methods, and evaluation metrics used in the analysis of media bias in NLP. We discuss open questions and suggest possible directions to close identified gaps between theory and predictive models, and their evaluation. These include model transparency, considering document-external information, and cross-document reasoning rather than single-label assignment.
Read more6/21/2024
0
BERT's Conceptual Cartography: Mapping the Landscapes of Meaning
Nina Haket, Ryan Daniels
Conceptual Engineers want to make words better. However, they often underestimate how varied our usage of words is. In this paper, we take the first steps in exploring the contextual nuances of words by creating conceptual landscapes -- 2D surfaces representing the pragmatic usage of words -- that conceptual engineers can use to inform their projects. We use the spoken component of the British National Corpus and BERT to create contextualised word embeddings, and use Gaussian Mixture Models, a selection of metrics, and qualitative analysis to visualise and numerically represent lexical landscapes. Such an approach has not yet been used in the conceptual engineering literature and provides a detailed examination of how different words manifest in various contexts that is potentially useful to conceptual engineering projects. Our findings highlight the inherent complexity of conceptual engineering, revealing that each word exhibits a unique and intricate landscape. Conceptual Engineers cannot, therefore, use a one-size-fits-all approach when improving words -- a task that may be practically intractable at scale.
Read more8/15/2024
0
Reasoning about concepts with LLMs: Inconsistencies abound
Rosario Uceda-Sosa, Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy, Maria Chang, Moninder Singh
The ability to summarize and organize knowledge into abstract concepts is key to learning and reasoning. Many industrial applications rely on the consistent and systematic use of concepts, especially when dealing with decision-critical knowledge. However, we demonstrate that, when methodically questioned, large language models (LLMs) often display and demonstrate significant inconsistencies in their knowledge. Computationally, the basic aspects of the conceptualization of a given domain can be represented as Is-A hierarchies in a knowledge graph (KG) or ontology, together with a few properties or axioms that enable straightforward reasoning. We show that even simple ontologies can be used to reveal conceptual inconsistencies across several LLMs. We also propose strategies that domain experts can use to evaluate and improve the coverage of key domain concepts in LLMs of various sizes. In particular, we have been able to significantly enhance the performance of LLMs of various sizes with openly available weights using simple knowledge-graph (KG) based prompting strategies.
Read more5/31/2024