RAR-b: Reasoning as Retrieval Benchmark
2404.06347
0
0
Abstract
Semantic textual similartiy (STS) and information retrieval tasks (IR) tasks have been the two major avenues to record the progress of embedding models in the past few years. Under the emerging Retrieval-augmented Generation (RAG) paradigm, we envision the need to evaluate next-level language understanding abilities of embedding models, and take a conscious look at the reasoning abilities stored in them. Addressing this, we pose the question: Can retrievers solve reasoning problems? By transforming reasoning tasks into retrieval tasks, we find that without specifically trained for reasoning-level language understanding, current state-of-the-art retriever models may still be far from being competent for playing the role of assisting LLMs, especially in reasoning-intensive tasks. Moreover, albeit trained to be aware of instructions, instruction-aware IR models are often better off without instructions in inference time for reasoning tasks, posing an overlooked retriever-LLM behavioral gap for the research community to align. However, recent decoder-based embedding models show great promise in narrowing the gap, highlighting the pathway for embedding models to achieve reasoning-level language understanding. We also show that, although current off-the-shelf re-ranker models fail on these tasks, injecting reasoning abilities into them through fine-tuning still appears easier than doing so to bi-encoders, and we are able to achieve state-of-the-art performance across all tasks by fine-tuning a reranking model. We release Reasoning as Retrieval Benchmark (RAR-b), a holistic suite of tasks and settings to evaluate the reasoning abilities stored in retriever models. RAR-b is available at https://github.com/gowitheflow-1998/RAR-b.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Presents a new benchmark called RAR-b (Reasoning as Retrieval Benchmark) for evaluating language models on reasoning tasks
- Focuses on assessing the ability of models to perform complex reasoning by retrieving and combining relevant information
- Includes a diverse set of tasks that go beyond standard language understanding and generation benchmarks
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new benchmark called RAR-b (Reasoning as Retrieval Benchmark) that aims to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of language models. Unlike traditional benchmarks that focus on language understanding and generation, RAR-b is designed to assess how well models can perform complex reasoning by retrieving and combining relevant information.
The key idea is that reasoning often involves finding and integrating various pieces of information, rather than just understanding individual statements or generating responses. RAR-b includes a diverse set of tasks that require models to demonstrate this kind of higher-level reasoning ability, going beyond what is typically measured in standard language benchmarks.
By providing a more comprehensive evaluation of reasoning skills, RAR-b can help researchers and developers better understand the strengths and limitations of language models and drive progress in developing more capable and versatile AI systems. The benchmark can also be useful for exploring the potential of retrieval-augmented reasoning, improving medical reasoning, and enhancing retrieval models.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes the RAR-b benchmark, which consists of a diverse set of tasks designed to assess the reasoning capabilities of language models. The key aspects of the benchmark are:
Problem Formulation: RAR-b frames reasoning as a retrieval task, where models need to retrieve and integrate relevant information from a knowledge base to solve a given problem. This is in contrast to more traditional benchmarks that focus on language understanding or generation.
Task Design: The benchmark includes a wide range of tasks, such as question answering, multi-hop reasoning, commonsense reasoning, and more. These tasks require models to demonstrate their ability to perform complex reasoning by retrieving and combining information from various sources.
Evaluation Metrics: The paper introduces several evaluation metrics to assess different aspects of the models' reasoning performance, including retrieval accuracy, reasoning accuracy, and combined reasoning-retrieval scores.
The paper also presents baseline results using several large language models, such as GPT-3 and BERT, as well as retrieval-augmented models like CBR-RAG and LLM-Augmented Retrieval. These results provide a starting point for evaluating and comparing the reasoning capabilities of different models on the RAR-b benchmark.
Critical Analysis
The RAR-b benchmark represents an important step in the evaluation of language models, as it moves beyond traditional language understanding and generation tasks to focus on more complex reasoning abilities. By framing reasoning as a retrieval task, the benchmark encourages the development of models that can effectively leverage and integrate information from diverse sources, which is a crucial skill for many real-world applications.
One potential limitation of the benchmark is the reliance on a fixed knowledge base, which may not fully capture the open-ended nature of real-world reasoning tasks. Exploring the integration of models with dynamic retrieval or self-reflection capabilities could further enhance the benchmark's ability to assess reasoning prowess.
Additionally, while the diversity of tasks in RAR-b is a strength, the authors could consider incorporating more task-agnostic evaluation approaches to provide a more holistic assessment of reasoning behavior, rather than relying solely on task-specific metrics.
Overall, the RAR-b benchmark represents an important contribution to the field of language model evaluation and can serve as a valuable tool for driving progress in the development of more capable and versatile AI systems.
Conclusion
The RAR-b benchmark introduced in this paper offers a novel approach to evaluating the reasoning capabilities of language models. By framing reasoning as a retrieval task and including a diverse set of challenging problems, RAR-b provides a more comprehensive assessment of the models' ability to perform complex reasoning by retrieving and integrating relevant information.
The benchmark's focus on reasoning skills, rather than just language understanding and generation, is a significant step forward in the field of AI evaluation. The results presented in the paper establish a baseline for comparing the reasoning performance of different models, and the benchmark can serve as a valuable tool for researchers and developers working to advance the state of the art in language-based reasoning and decision-making.
As the field of AI continues to evolve, benchmarks like RAR-b will play an increasingly important role in driving progress and ensuring that the development of language models is aligned with the real-world needs and challenges that these systems will ultimately need to address.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Retrieval Meets Reasoning: Even High-school Textbook Knowledge Benefits Multimodal Reasoning
Cheng Tan, Jingxuan Wei, Linzhuang Sun, Zhangyang Gao, Siyuan Li, Bihui Yu, Ruifeng Guo, Stan Z. Li
0
0
Large language models equipped with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) represent a burgeoning field aimed at enhancing answering capabilities by leveraging external knowledge bases. Although the application of RAG with language-only models has been extensively explored, its adaptation into multimodal vision-language models remains nascent. Going beyond mere answer generation, the primary goal of multimodal RAG is to cultivate the models' ability to reason in response to relevant queries. To this end, we introduce a novel multimodal RAG framework named RMR (Retrieval Meets Reasoning). The RMR framework employs a bi-modal retrieval module to identify the most relevant question-answer pairs, which then serve as scaffolds for the multimodal reasoning process. This training-free approach not only encourages the model to engage deeply with the reasoning processes inherent in the retrieved content but also facilitates the generation of answers that are precise and richly interpretable. Surprisingly, utilizing solely the ScienceQA dataset, collected from elementary and high school science curricula, RMR significantly boosts the performance of various vision-language models across a spectrum of benchmark datasets, including A-OKVQA, MMBench, and SEED. These outcomes highlight the substantial potential of our multimodal retrieval and reasoning mechanism to improve the reasoning capabilities of vision-language models.
6/3/2024
MARS: Benchmarking the Metaphysical Reasoning Abilities of Language Models with a Multi-task Evaluation Dataset
Weiqi Wang, Yangqiu Song
0
0
To enable Large Language Models (LLMs) to function as conscious agents with generalizable reasoning capabilities, it is crucial that they possess the reasoning ability to comprehend situational changes (transitions) in distribution triggered by environmental factors or actions from other agents. Despite its fundamental significance, this ability remains underexplored due to the complexity of modeling infinite possible changes in an event and their associated distributions, coupled with the lack of benchmark data with situational transitions. Addressing these gaps, we propose a novel formulation of reasoning with distributional changes as a three-step discriminative process, termed as MetAphysical ReaSoning. We then introduce the first-ever benchmark, MARS, comprising three tasks corresponding to each step. These tasks systematically assess LLMs' capabilities in reasoning the plausibility of (i) changes in actions, (ii) states caused by changed actions, and (iii) situational transitions driven by changes in action. Extensive evaluations with 20 (L)LMs of varying sizes and methods indicate that all three tasks in this process pose significant challenges, even for state-of-the-art LLMs and LMs after fine-tuning. Further analyses reveal potential causes for the underperformance of LLMs and demonstrate that pre-training them on large-scale conceptualization taxonomies can potentially enhance their metaphysical reasoning capabilities. Our data and models are publicly accessible at https://github.com/HKUST-KnowComp/MARS.
6/5/2024
CodeRAG-Bench: Can Retrieval Augment Code Generation?
Zora Zhiruo Wang, Akari Asai, Xinyan Velocity Yu, Frank F. Xu, Yiqing Xie, Graham Neubig, Daniel Fried
0
0
While language models (LMs) have proven remarkably adept at generating code, many programs are challenging for LMs to generate using their parametric knowledge alone. Providing external contexts such as library documentation can facilitate generating accurate and functional code. Despite the success of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) in various text-oriented tasks, its potential for improving code generation remains under-explored. In this work, we conduct a systematic, large-scale analysis by asking: in what scenarios can retrieval benefit code generation models? and what challenges remain? We first curate a comprehensive evaluation benchmark, CodeRAG-Bench, encompassing three categories of code generation tasks, including basic programming, open-domain, and repository-level problems. We aggregate documents from five sources for models to retrieve contexts: competition solutions, online tutorials, library documentation, StackOverflow posts, and GitHub repositories. We examine top-performing models on CodeRAG-Bench by providing contexts retrieved from one or multiple sources. While notable gains are made in final code generation by retrieving high-quality contexts across various settings, our analysis reveals room for improvement -- current retrievers still struggle to fetch useful contexts especially with limited lexical overlap, and generators fail to improve with limited context lengths or abilities to integrate additional contexts. We hope CodeRAG-Bench serves as an effective testbed to encourage further development of advanced code-oriented RAG methods.
6/21/2024
New!RAVEN: Multitask Retrieval Augmented Vision-Language Learning
Varun Nagaraj Rao, Siddharth Choudhary, Aditya Deshpande, Ravi Kumar Satzoda, Srikar Appalaraju
0
0
The scaling of large language models to encode all the world's knowledge in model parameters is unsustainable and has exacerbated resource barriers. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) presents a potential solution, yet its application to vision-language models (VLMs) is under explored. Existing methods focus on models designed for single tasks. Furthermore, they're limited by the need for resource intensive pre training, additional parameter requirements, unaddressed modality prioritization and lack of clear benefit over non-retrieval baselines. This paper introduces RAVEN, a multitask retrieval augmented VLM framework that enhances base VLMs through efficient, task specific fine-tuning. By integrating retrieval augmented samples without the need for additional retrieval-specific parameters, we show that the model acquires retrieval properties that are effective across multiple tasks. Our results and extensive ablations across retrieved modalities for the image captioning and VQA tasks indicate significant performance improvements compared to non retrieved baselines +1 CIDEr on MSCOCO, +4 CIDEr on NoCaps and nearly a +3% accuracy on specific VQA question types. This underscores the efficacy of applying RAG approaches to VLMs, marking a stride toward more efficient and accessible multimodal learning.
6/28/2024