Bias Neutralization Framework: Measuring Fairness in Large Language Models with Bias Intelligence Quotient (BiQ)
2404.18276
0
0
💬
Abstract
The burgeoning influence of Large Language Models (LLMs) in shaping public discourse and decision-making underscores the imperative to address inherent biases within these AI systems. In the wake of AI's expansive integration across sectors, addressing racial bias in LLMs has never been more critical. This paper introduces a novel framework called Comprehensive Bias Neutralization Framework (CBNF) which embodies an innovative approach to quantifying and mitigating biases within LLMs. Our framework combines the Large Language Model Bias Index (LLMBI) [Oketunji, A., Anas, M., Saina, D., (2023)] and Bias removaL with No Demographics (BLIND) [Orgad, H., Belinkov, Y. (2023)] methodologies to create a new metric called Bias Intelligence Quotient (BiQ)which detects, measures, and mitigates racial bias in LLMs without reliance on demographic annotations. By introducing a new metric called BiQ that enhances LLMBI with additional fairness metrics, CBNF offers a multi-dimensional metric for bias assessment, underscoring the necessity of a nuanced approach to fairness in AI [Mehrabi et al., 2021]. This paper presents a detailed analysis of Latimer AI (a language model incrementally trained on black history and culture) in comparison to ChatGPT 3.5, illustrating Latimer AI's efficacy in detecting racial, cultural, and gender biases through targeted training and refined bias mitigation strategies [Latimer & Bender, 2023].
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- This paper introduces a novel framework called Comprehensive Bias Neutralization Framework (CBNF) to address racial bias in Large Language Models (LLMs).
- CBNF combines the Large Language Model Bias Index (LLMBI) and Bias removaL with No Demographics (BLIND) methodologies to create a new metric called Bias Intelligence Quotient (BiQ).
- The paper presents a detailed analysis of Latimer AI, a language model trained on black history and culture, in comparison to ChatGPT 3.5, illustrating Latimer AI's effectiveness in detecting and mitigating racial, cultural, and gender biases.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT have become incredibly influential, shaping public discourse and decision-making. However, these AI systems can also reflect and amplify societal biases, particularly racial biases. This paper introduces a new framework called Comprehensive Bias Neutralization Framework (CBNF) to address this issue.
CBNF combines two existing methods, the Large Language Model Bias Index (LLMBI) and Bias removaL with No Demographics (BLIND), to create a new metric called Bias Intelligence Quotient (BiQ). This BiQ metric is designed to detect, measure, and mitigate racial bias in LLMs without relying on demographic information, which can be problematic.
To illustrate the effectiveness of CBNF, the paper compares Latimer AI, a language model trained on black history and culture, to the widely-used ChatGPT 3.5. The analysis shows that Latimer AI is better at detecting and addressing racial, cultural, and gender biases through its targeted training and refined bias mitigation strategies.
Technical Explanation
This paper introduces the Comprehensive Bias Neutralization Framework (CBNF), a novel approach to quantifying and mitigating biases within large language models (LLMs). CBNF combines the Large Language Model Bias Index (LLMBI) and Bias removaL with No Demographics (BLIND) methodologies to create a new metric called the Bias Intelligence Quotient (BiQ).
The BiQ metric is designed to detect, measure, and mitigate racial bias in LLMs without relying on demographic annotations, which can be problematic. By incorporating additional fairness metrics, CBNF offers a multi-dimensional approach to bias assessment, as highlighted in the fairness in large language models taxonomic survey.
The paper presents a detailed analysis comparing the performance of Latimer AI, a language model incrementally trained on black history and culture, to the widely-used ChatGPT 3.5. The results illustrate Latimer AI's effectiveness in detecting and addressing racial, cultural, and gender biases through its targeted training and refined bias mitigation strategies, as described in the evaluation and mitigation of linguistic discrimination in large language models and approaches to detecting unanticipated bias in large language models.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling framework for addressing racial bias in LLMs, but it is important to consider some potential limitations and areas for further research. While the BiQ metric offers a promising multi-dimensional approach to bias assessment, it is not clear how it compares to other bias measurement techniques in terms of robustness and generalizability.
Additionally, the paper's focus on racial bias is crucial, but it would be valuable to explore how CBNF could be extended to address other forms of bias, such as gender or socioeconomic bias, to provide a more comprehensive solution. The authors acknowledge this, and further research in this direction could strengthen the framework.
It is also worth considering how the CBNF framework could be applied in real-world settings, where the availability and quality of data for bias evaluation and mitigation may vary. Exploring the practical implementation challenges and potential trade-offs would help assess the framework's usability and scalability.
Conclusion
This paper introduces the Comprehensive Bias Neutralization Framework (CBNF), a novel approach to quantifying and mitigating racial bias in large language models (LLMs). By combining the Large Language Model Bias Index (LLMBI) and Bias removaL with No Demographics (BLIND) methodologies, CBNF creates a new Bias Intelligence Quotient (BiQ) metric that addresses the limitations of demographic-based bias assessment.
The paper's detailed analysis of Latimer AI, a language model trained on black history and culture, demonstrates the framework's effectiveness in detecting and mitigating racial, cultural, and gender biases. As LLMs continue to shape public discourse and decision-making, the importance of addressing inherent biases within these systems cannot be overstated. The CBNF framework represents a significant step towards a more nuanced and comprehensive approach to fairness in AI.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧪
LangBiTe: A Platform for Testing Bias in Large Language Models
Sergio Morales, Robert Claris'o, Jordi Cabot
0
0
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into various software applications raises concerns about their potential biases. Typically, those models are trained on a vast amount of data scrapped from forums, websites, social media and other internet sources, which may instill harmful and discriminating behavior into the model. To address this issue, we present LangBiTe, a testing platform to systematically assess the presence of biases within an LLM. LangBiTe enables development teams to tailor their test scenarios, and automatically generate and execute the test cases according to a set of user-defined ethical requirements. Each test consists of a prompt fed into the LLM and a corresponding test oracle that scrutinizes the LLM's response for the identification of biases. LangBite provides users with the bias evaluation of LLMs, and end-to-end traceability between the initial ethical requirements and the insights obtained.
4/30/2024
Beyond Performance: Quantifying and Mitigating Label Bias in LLMs
Yuval Reif, Roy Schwartz
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable adaptability to diverse tasks, by leveraging context prompts containing instructions, or minimal input-output examples. However, recent work revealed they also exhibit label bias -- an undesirable preference toward predicting certain answers over others. Still, detecting and measuring this bias reliably and at scale has remained relatively unexplored. In this study, we evaluate different approaches to quantifying label bias in a model's predictions, conducting a comprehensive investigation across 279 classification tasks and ten LLMs. Our investigation reveals substantial label bias in models both before and after debiasing attempts, as well as highlights the importance of outcomes-based evaluation metrics, which were not previously used in this regard. We further propose a novel label bias calibration method tailored for few-shot prompting, which outperforms recent calibration approaches for both improving performance and mitigating label bias. Our results emphasize that label bias in the predictions of LLMs remains a barrier to their reliability.
5/7/2024
Reevaluating Bias Detection in Language Models: The Role of Implicit Norm
Farnaz Kohankhaki, Jacob-Junqi Tian, David Emerson, Laleh Seyyed-Kalantari, Faiza Khan Khattak
0
0
Large language models (LLMs), trained on vast datasets, can carry biases that manifest in various forms, from overt discrimination to implicit stereotypes. One facet of bias is performance disparities in LLMs, often harming underprivileged groups, such as racial minorities. A common approach to quantifying bias is to use template-based bias probes, which explicitly state group membership (e.g. White) and evaluate if the outcome of a task, sentiment analysis for instance, is invariant to the change of group membership (e.g. change White race to Black). This approach is widely used in bias quantification. However, in this work, we find evidence of an unexpectedly overlooked consequence of using template-based probes for LLM bias quantification. We find that in doing so, text examples associated with White ethnicities appear to be classified as exhibiting negative sentiment at elevated rates. We hypothesize that the scenario arises artificially through a mismatch between the pre-training text of LLMs and the templates used to measure bias through reporting bias, unstated norms that imply group membership without explicit statement. Our finding highlights the potential misleading impact of varying group membership through explicit mention in bias quantification
4/9/2024
💬
Fairness in Large Language Models: A Taxonomic Survey
Zhibo Chu, Zichong Wang, Wenbin Zhang
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success across various domains. However, despite their promising performance in numerous real-world applications, most of these algorithms lack fairness considerations. Consequently, they may lead to discriminatory outcomes against certain communities, particularly marginalized populations, prompting extensive study in fair LLMs. On the other hand, fairness in LLMs, in contrast to fairness in traditional machine learning, entails exclusive backgrounds, taxonomies, and fulfillment techniques. To this end, this survey presents a comprehensive overview of recent advances in the existing literature concerning fair LLMs. Specifically, a brief introduction to LLMs is provided, followed by an analysis of factors contributing to bias in LLMs. Additionally, the concept of fairness in LLMs is discussed categorically, summarizing metrics for evaluating bias in LLMs and existing algorithms for promoting fairness. Furthermore, resources for evaluating bias in LLMs, including toolkits and datasets, are summarized. Finally, existing research challenges and open questions are discussed.
4/3/2024