BiasAlert: A Plug-and-play Tool for Social Bias Detection in LLMs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Presents a tool called BiasAlert for detecting social biases in large language models (LLMs)
- BiasAlert is designed to be a plug-and-play solution for bias detection
- The tool aims to help researchers and developers identify and mitigate biases in their LLMs
Plain English Explanation
BiasAlert is a tool that helps identify biases in large language models (LLMs), which are AI systems that can generate human-like text. Biases in LLMs can lead to unfair or discriminatory outputs, so it's important to be able to detect and address them.
BiasAlert is designed to be easy to use - you can simply plug it into your LLM and it will analyze the model for biases. This makes it a useful tool for researchers and developers who want to ensure their LLMs are fair and unbiased.
The key idea behind BiasAlert is to look for patterns in the language the LLM uses that might reflect social biases, such as stereotypes or prejudices. By identifying these biases, developers can then work to mitigate them and make their LLMs more equitable.
Technical Explanation
The paper describes the design and implementation of BiasAlert, a tool for detecting social biases in large language models (LLMs). BiasAlert uses a suite of probes to identify biases in an LLM's outputs, including tests for gender bias, racial bias, and other forms of social bias.
The tool works by generating a set of prompts designed to elicit biased responses from the target LLM. BiasAlert then analyzes the model's outputs to quantify the degree of bias present. The authors evaluate BiasAlert on a range of popular LLMs, including GPT-3, and demonstrate its ability to reliably detect known biases in these models.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a useful and timely contribution to the growing body of research on bias in large language models. By providing a plug-and-play tool for bias detection, the authors make it easier for researchers and developers to audit their LLMs and identify areas for improvement.
However, the paper also acknowledges some limitations of BiasAlert. For example, the tool may not be able to detect more subtle or context-dependent biases, and its effectiveness may depend on the specific prompts and tests used. The authors also note that bias mitigation is a complex challenge that requires ongoing attention and refinement of techniques.
Furthermore, the paper on bias testing and mitigation in LLM-based code generation highlights the need for more comprehensive approaches to addressing biases in different applications of LLMs. The survey on bias and fairness in LLMs also emphasizes the multifaceted nature of the bias problem and the importance of continued research in this area.
Conclusion
BiasAlert represents an important step forward in the ongoing effort to understand and mitigate biases in large language models. By providing a practical tool for bias detection, the authors are helping to make LLMs more transparent and accountable. As the use of LLMs continues to grow, tools like BiasAlert will be crucial for ensuring these powerful AI systems are developed and deployed responsibly.
The paper on social bias evaluation in LLMs and the research on unveiling and mitigating bias in mental health analysis further underscore the importance of this work and the need for continued advancements in the field of bias detection and mitigation for large language models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
BiasAlert: A Plug-and-play Tool for Social Bias Detection in LLMs
Zhiting Fan, Ruizhe Chen, Ruiling Xu, Zuozhu Liu
Evaluating the bias in Large Language Models (LLMs) becomes increasingly crucial with their rapid development. However, existing evaluation methods rely on fixed-form outputs and cannot adapt to the flexible open-text generation scenarios of LLMs (e.g., sentence completion and question answering). To address this, we introduce BiasAlert, a plug-and-play tool designed to detect social bias in open-text generations of LLMs. BiasAlert integrates external human knowledge with inherent reasoning capabilities to detect bias reliably. Extensive experiments demonstrate that BiasAlert significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods like GPT4-as-A-Judge in detecting bias. Furthermore, through application studies, we demonstrate the utility of BiasAlert in reliable LLM bias evaluation and bias mitigation across various scenarios. Model and code will be publicly released.
Read more7/23/2024
๐ฌ
0
Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey
Isabel O. Gallegos, Ryan A. Rossi, Joe Barrow, Md Mehrab Tanjim, Sungchul Kim, Franck Dernoncourt, Tong Yu, Ruiyi Zhang, Nesreen K. Ahmed
Rapid advancements of large language models (LLMs) have enabled the processing, understanding, and generation of human-like text, with increasing integration into systems that touch our social sphere. Despite this success, these models can learn, perpetuate, and amplify harmful social biases. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of bias evaluation and mitigation techniques for LLMs. We first consolidate, formalize, and expand notions of social bias and fairness in natural language processing, defining distinct facets of harm and introducing several desiderata to operationalize fairness for LLMs. We then unify the literature by proposing three intuitive taxonomies, two for bias evaluation, namely metrics and datasets, and one for mitigation. Our first taxonomy of metrics for bias evaluation disambiguates the relationship between metrics and evaluation datasets, and organizes metrics by the different levels at which they operate in a model: embeddings, probabilities, and generated text. Our second taxonomy of datasets for bias evaluation categorizes datasets by their structure as counterfactual inputs or prompts, and identifies the targeted harms and social groups; we also release a consolidation of publicly-available datasets for improved access. Our third taxonomy of techniques for bias mitigation classifies methods by their intervention during pre-processing, in-training, intra-processing, and post-processing, with granular subcategories that elucidate research trends. Finally, we identify open problems and challenges for future work. Synthesizing a wide range of recent research, we aim to provide a clear guide of the existing literature that empowers researchers and practitioners to better understand and prevent the propagation of bias in LLMs.
Read more7/16/2024
๐งช
0
Bias Testing and Mitigation in LLM-based Code Generation
Dong Huang, Qingwen Bu, Jie Zhang, Xiaofei Xie, Junjie Chen, Heming Cui
Utilizing state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs), automatic code generation models play a pivotal role in enhancing the productivity of software development procedures. As the adoption of LLMs becomes more widespread in software coding ecosystems, a pressing issue has emerged: does the generated code contain social bias and unfairness, such as those related to age, gender, and race? This issue concerns the integrity, fairness, and ethical foundation of software applications that depend on the code generated by these models, yet is under-explored in the literature. This paper presents a novel bias testing framework that is specifically designed for code generation tasks. Based on this framework, we conduct an extensive evaluation of the bias in code generated by five state-of-the-art LLMs. Our findings reveal that 20.29% to 44.93% code functions generated by the models under study are biased when handling bias sensitive tasks (i.e., tasks that involve sensitive attributes such as age and gender). This indicates that the existing LLMs can be unfair in code generation, posing risks of unintended and harmful software behaviors. To mitigate bias for code generation models, we evaluate five bias mitigation prompt strategies, i.e., utilizing bias testing results to refine the code (zero-shot), one-, few-shot, and two Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompts. Our evaluation results illustrate that these strategies are all effective in mitigating bias. Overall, one-shot and few-shot learning are the two most effective. For GPT-4, 80% to 90% code bias can be removed with one-shot learning.
Read more5/27/2024
0
Decoding Biases: Automated Methods and LLM Judges for Gender Bias Detection in Language Models
Shachi H Kumar, Saurav Sahay, Sahisnu Mazumder, Eda Okur, Ramesh Manuvinakurike, Nicole Beckage, Hsuan Su, Hung-yi Lee, Lama Nachman
Large Language Models (LLMs) have excelled at language understanding and generating human-level text. However, even with supervised training and human alignment, these LLMs are susceptible to adversarial attacks where malicious users can prompt the model to generate undesirable text. LLMs also inherently encode potential biases that can cause various harmful effects during interactions. Bias evaluation metrics lack standards as well as consensus and existing methods often rely on human-generated templates and annotations which are expensive and labor intensive. In this work, we train models to automatically create adversarial prompts to elicit biased responses from target LLMs. We present LLM- based bias evaluation metrics and also analyze several existing automatic evaluation methods and metrics. We analyze the various nuances of model responses, identify the strengths and weaknesses of model families, and assess where evaluation methods fall short. We compare these metrics to human evaluation and validate that the LLM-as-a-Judge metric aligns with human judgement on bias in response generation.
Read more8/9/2024