Bivariate Causal Discovery using Bayesian Model Selection

Overview

• The paper focuses on the challenge of identifying the direction of causal relationships in statistical models, even when multiple models are equally likely (Markov equivalent).
• The authors propose a Bayesian approach to causal discovery, which allows for incorporating realistic causal assumptions and differentiating between Markov equivalent causal structures.
• They demonstrate their approach using a Bayesian non-parametric model and show improved performance on a wide range of benchmark datasets compared to previous methods.

Plain English Explanation

When trying to understand how things are causally related, researchers often focus on guaranteeing the ability to determine the direction of these causal relationships. However, this requires making strong assumptions that may not hold true in real-world datasets. This can ultimately limit the usefulness of these methods.

The authors of this paper build on previous work and show how to incorporate causal assumptions within a Bayesian framework. This allows them to treat the identification of causal direction as a Bayesian model selection problem. This, in turn, enables them to construct models with more realistic assumptions and differentiate between causal structures that are Markov equivalent (i.e., equally likely based on the observed data).

To demonstrate their approach, the authors develop a Bayesian non-parametric model that can flexibly model the underlying data distribution. They then show that their method outperforms previous approaches on a variety of benchmark datasets, even when the assumptions about the data-generating process vary.

Technical Explanation

The paper addresses the challenge of identifying causal direction in statistical models, even when multiple models are Markov equivalent and therefore equally likely given the observed data. The authors propose a Bayesian approach to causal discovery, which allows for the incorporation of causal assumptions and the differentiation between Markov equivalent causal structures.

The authors analyze why Bayesian model selection can succeed in situations where methods based on maximum likelihood fail. They then construct a Bayesian non-parametric model that can flexibly model the joint distribution of the data. By using this approach, the authors are able to outperform previous methods on a wide range of benchmark datasets, even when the underlying data-generating assumptions vary.

The paper builds on previous attempts to address causal discovery, such as causal discovery under latent class confounding, sample-estimate-aggregate recipe for causal discovery, and simultaneous identification of models and parameters for scientific simulators.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge that their approach still requires the specification of causal assumptions, which may not always be straightforward or available. Additionally, the Bayesian non-parametric model they develop may become computationally expensive as the number of variables increases.

While the authors demonstrate improved performance on benchmark datasets, it would be valuable to see how their method performs on real-world datasets with complex, messy, and potentially confounded relationships. Further research could also investigate the robustness of their approach to violations of the causal assumptions or the impact of incorporating domain-specific knowledge.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel Bayesian approach to causal discovery that allows for the incorporation of causal assumptions and the differentiation between Markov equivalent causal structures. By developing a flexible Bayesian non-parametric model, the authors demonstrate improved performance on a range of benchmark datasets compared to previous methods.

The key contribution of this work is the ability to construct models with more realistic assumptions, which can lead to better identification of causal relationships in real-world scenarios. This has important implications for fields such as policy-making, healthcare, and scientific research, where understanding causal mechanisms is crucial for informed decision-making.