Blessings and Curses of Covariate Shifts: Adversarial Learning Dynamics, Directional Convergence, and Equilibria

Read original: arXiv:2212.02457 - Published 5/21/2024 by Tengyuan Liang
Total Score

0

🖼️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper examines the challenges that covariate distribution shifts and adversarial perturbations pose to conventional statistical learning models.
  • It explores how these shifts can significantly impact model performance, especially when the test data is in regions where the training data is scarce.
  • The paper characterizes the extrapolation region and studies the implications of adversarial covariate shifts on the learning of the optimal Bayes model in a sequential game framework.
  • It establishes two directional convergence results - a "blessing" in regression where the adversarial shifts converge rapidly to an optimal experimental design, and a "curse" in classification where the shifts converge to the hardest experimental design, trapping subsequent learning.

Plain English Explanation

Machine learning models are often trained on a certain dataset, but then used to make predictions on new, different data. Covariate distribution shifts refer to when the new data has a different distribution than the training data. This can cause the model's performance to degrade significantly, as the model has not been trained on that type of data.

Adversarial perturbations are small, deliberate changes to the input data that can fool a machine learning model into making incorrect predictions. These perturbations are designed to exploit weaknesses in the model and cause it to perform poorly, even on data that is very similar to the training data.

This paper looks at how covariate distribution shifts and adversarial perturbations affect the performance of machine learning models, particularly in out-of-distribution settings where the test data is quite different from the training data. It characterizes the regions where the model is likely to perform poorly due to these issues.

The paper then explores a game-theoretic approach, where an "adversary" tries to find the worst-case covariate shifts to make the model perform badly, and the model tries to learn the optimal Bayes model to be as robust as possible. Interestingly, the paper finds that this adversarial process can actually be beneficial in some cases, such as in regression problems where it leads to an optimal experimental design. In other cases, such as in classification problems, the adversarial process can trap the model in a suboptimal state.

Technical Explanation

The paper precisely characterizes the extrapolation region where the model is likely to perform poorly due to covariate distribution shifts. It examines both regression and classification problems in an infinite-dimensional setting.

The researchers study the implications of adversarial covariate shifts on the subsequent learning of the equilibrium - the Bayes optimal model. They use a sequential game framework, where an adversary tries to find the worst-case covariate shifts to degrade model performance, and the model tries to learn the optimal Bayes model to be as robust as possible.

By exploiting the dynamics of this adversarial learning game, the paper reveals two distinctive phenomena:

  1. In regression problems, the adversarial covariate shifts converge at an exponential rate to an optimal experimental design, which actually facilitates rapid subsequent learning of the Bayes optimal model. This is described as a "blessing" of adversarial covariate shifts.

  2. In classification problems, the adversarial covariate shifts converge at a subquadratic rate to the hardest experimental design, trapping subsequent learning of the Bayes optimal model. This is described as a "curse" of adversarial covariate shifts.

The paper's analysis provides insights into the complex interplay between covariate distribution shifts, adversarial perturbations, and the learning of optimal statistical models. These findings have implications for enhancing model robustness and improving experimental design in machine learning applications.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough theoretical analysis of the implications of adversarial covariate shifts on the learning of Bayes optimal models. However, the authors acknowledge that the results are primarily of a theoretical nature and that further empirical validation is needed to understand the practical implications of these phenomena.

Additionally, the paper focuses on an idealized setting with infinite-dimensional covariates and Bayes optimal models. Extending the analysis to more realistic, finite-dimensional scenarios with approximate models may yield additional insights and challenges.

The directional convergence results, while intriguing, rely on specific assumptions about the adversarial strategy and the structure of the problem. It would be valuable to explore the robustness of these findings to alternative modeling assumptions or adversarial strategies.

Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the understanding of the interplay between covariate distribution shifts, adversarial perturbations, and optimal model learning. The insights provided can inform the development of more robust and reliable machine learning systems, but further research is needed to bridge the gap between theory and practice.

Conclusion

This paper offers a novel perspective on the challenges posed by covariate distribution shifts and adversarial perturbations in the context of statistical learning. By characterizing the extrapolation regions and studying the implications of adversarial covariate shifts on the learning of Bayes optimal models, the authors have uncovered intriguing phenomena that can have significant implications for enhancing model robustness and improving experimental design.

The key findings, namely the "blessing" in regression and the "curse" in classification, provide valuable insights into the complex dynamics at play. While the theoretical analysis is rigorous, further empirical validation and extensions to more realistic scenarios are necessary to fully understand the practical applications of these insights.

Overall, this paper contributes to the ongoing effort to build more robust and reliable machine learning systems that can reliably operate in diverse and challenging environments. The insights gained from this work can inform future research and development in this important field.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🖼️

Total Score

0

Blessings and Curses of Covariate Shifts: Adversarial Learning Dynamics, Directional Convergence, and Equilibria

Tengyuan Liang

Covariate distribution shifts and adversarial perturbations present robustness challenges to the conventional statistical learning framework: mild shifts in the test covariate distribution can significantly affect the performance of the statistical model learned based on the training distribution. The model performance typically deteriorates when extrapolation happens: namely, covariates shift to a region where the training distribution is scarce, and naturally, the learned model has little information. For robustness and regularization considerations, adversarial perturbation techniques are proposed as a remedy; however, careful study needs to be carried out about what extrapolation region adversarial covariate shift will focus on, given a learned model. This paper precisely characterizes the extrapolation region, examining both regression and classification in an infinite-dimensional setting. We study the implications of adversarial covariate shifts to subsequent learning of the equilibrium -- the Bayes optimal model -- in a sequential game framework. We exploit the dynamics of the adversarial learning game and reveal the curious effects of the covariate shift to equilibrium learning and experimental design. In particular, we establish two directional convergence results that exhibit distinctive phenomena: (1) a blessing in regression, the adversarial covariate shifts in an exponential rate to an optimal experimental design for rapid subsequent learning; (2) a curse in classification, the adversarial covariate shifts in a subquadratic rate to the hardest experimental design trapping subsequent learning.

Read more

5/21/2024

Learning When the Concept Shifts: Confounding, Invariance, and Dimension Reduction
Total Score

0

Learning When the Concept Shifts: Confounding, Invariance, and Dimension Reduction

Kulunu Dharmakeerthi, YoonHaeng Hur, Tengyuan Liang

Practitioners often deploy a learned prediction model in a new environment where the joint distribution of covariate and response has shifted. In observational data, the distribution shift is often driven by unobserved confounding factors lurking in the environment, with the underlying mechanism unknown. Confounding can obfuscate the definition of the best prediction model (concept shift) and shift covariates to domains yet unseen (covariate shift). Therefore, a model maximizing prediction accuracy in the source environment could suffer a significant accuracy drop in the target environment. This motivates us to study the domain adaptation problem with observational data: given labeled covariate and response pairs from a source environment, and unlabeled covariates from a target environment, how can one predict the missing target response reliably? We root the adaptation problem in a linear structural causal model to address endogeneity and unobserved confounding. We study the necessity and benefit of leveraging exogenous, invariant covariate representations to cure concept shifts and improve target prediction. This further motivates a new representation learning method for adaptation that optimizes for a lower-dimensional linear subspace and, subsequently, a prediction model confined to that subspace. The procedure operates on a non-convex objective-that naturally interpolates between predictability and stability/invariance-constrained on the Stiefel manifold. We study the optimization landscape and prove that, when the regularization is sufficient, nearly all local optima align with an invariant linear subspace resilient to both concept and covariate shift. In terms of predictability, we show a model that uses the learned lower-dimensional subspace can incur a nearly ideal gap between target and source risk. Three real-world data sets are investigated to validate our method and theory.

Read more

6/26/2024

🔄

Total Score

0

Tolerant Algorithms for Learning with Arbitrary Covariate Shift

Surbhi Goel, Abhishek Shetty, Konstantinos Stavropoulos, Arsen Vasilyan

We study the problem of learning under arbitrary distribution shift, where the learner is trained on a labeled set from one distribution but evaluated on a different, potentially adversarially generated test distribution. We focus on two frameworks: PQ learning [Goldwasser, A. Kalai, Y. Kalai, Montasser NeurIPS 2020], allowing abstention on adversarially generated parts of the test distribution, and TDS learning [Klivans, Stavropoulos, Vasilyan COLT 2024], permitting abstention on the entire test distribution if distribution shift is detected. All prior known algorithms either rely on learning primitives that are computationally hard even for simple function classes, or end up abstaining entirely even in the presence of a tiny amount of distribution shift. We address both these challenges for natural function classes, including intersections of halfspaces and decision trees, and standard training distributions, including Gaussians. For PQ learning, we give efficient learning algorithms, while for TDS learning, our algorithms can tolerate moderate amounts of distribution shift. At the core of our approach is an improved analysis of spectral outlier-removal techniques from learning with nasty noise. Our analysis can (1) handle arbitrarily large fraction of outliers, which is crucial for handling arbitrary distribution shifts, and (2) obtain stronger bounds on polynomial moments of the distribution after outlier removal, yielding new insights into polynomial regression under distribution shifts. Lastly, our techniques lead to novel results for tolerant testable learning [Rubinfeld and Vasilyan STOC 2023], and learning with nasty noise.

Read more

6/6/2024

Algorithmic Fairness Generalization under Covariate and Dependence Shifts Simultaneously
Total Score

0

Algorithmic Fairness Generalization under Covariate and Dependence Shifts Simultaneously

Chen Zhao, Kai Jiang, Xintao Wu, Haoliang Wang, Latifur Khan, Christan Grant, Feng Chen

The endeavor to preserve the generalization of a fair and invariant classifier across domains, especially in the presence of distribution shifts, becomes a significant and intricate challenge in machine learning. In response to this challenge, numerous effective algorithms have been developed with a focus on addressing the problem of fairness-aware domain generalization. These algorithms are designed to navigate various types of distribution shifts, with a particular emphasis on covariate and dependence shifts. In this context, covariate shift pertains to changes in the marginal distribution of input features, while dependence shift involves alterations in the joint distribution of the label variable and sensitive attributes. In this paper, we introduce a simple but effective approach that aims to learn a fair and invariant classifier by simultaneously addressing both covariate and dependence shifts across domains. We assert the existence of an underlying transformation model can transform data from one domain to another, while preserving the semantics related to non-sensitive attributes and classes. By augmenting various synthetic data domains through the model, we learn a fair and invariant classifier in source domains. This classifier can then be generalized to unknown target domains, maintaining both model prediction and fairness concerns. Extensive empirical studies on four benchmark datasets demonstrate that our approach surpasses state-of-the-art methods.

Read more

5/22/2024