BO4IO: A Bayesian optimization approach to inverse optimization with uncertainty quantification

Read original: arXiv:2405.17875 - Published 5/29/2024 by Yen-An Lu, Wei-Shou Hu, Joel A. Paulson, Qi Zhang

BO4IO: A Bayesian optimization approach to inverse optimization with uncertainty quantification

Overview

This paper presents a Bayesian optimization approach to the inverse optimization problem, which aims to infer the underlying objective function of a decision-maker based on observed decisions.
The proposed method, called BO4IO, uses Bayesian optimization techniques to efficiently explore the space of possible objective functions and quantify the uncertainty in the inferred objective.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of BO4IO on several synthetic and real-world examples, showing that it outperforms existing inverse optimization methods.

Plain English Explanation

The paper tackles the problem of inverse optimization, which is about figuring out the hidden goals or objectives that guide someone's decisions. For example, imagine you're observing a person's buying habits at a store. You might wonder - what are the factors that are really driving their choices? Is it just price, or are there other considerations like brand, quality, or convenience that are shaping their behavior?

The authors of this paper propose a new approach called BO4IO (Bayesian Optimization for Inverse Optimization) to solve this inverse optimization problem. BO4IO uses a technique called Bayesian optimization, which is a powerful way to efficiently explore a space of possible solutions and find the one that best matches the observed data.

The key advantage of BO4IO is that it not only infers the underlying objective function, but also provides a measure of the uncertainty in that inferred function. This is important because in many real-world situations, we can't be 100% sure about the true objectives driving someone's decisions - there's always some degree of ambiguity or noise in the data.

By quantifying this uncertainty, BO4IO gives us a more complete picture of the decision-making process. It doesn't just give us a single "best guess" of the objective function, but rather a probability distribution over possible functions. This additional information can be very valuable, especially when the inferred objectives are used to inform important decisions or policies.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of BO4IO on several examples, showing that it outperforms existing inverse optimization methods. This suggests that BO4IO could be a useful tool for a wide range of applications, from understanding consumer behavior to optimizing business strategies or public policies.

Technical Explanation

The inverse optimization problem aims to infer the underlying objective function of a decision-maker based on observed decisions. This is in contrast to the forward optimization problem, where the goal is to find the optimal decision given a known objective function.

In this paper, the authors present a novel Bayesian optimization approach to the inverse optimization problem, called BO4IO. BO4IO models the unknown objective function as a Gaussian process, which allows for efficient exploration of the space of possible functions and quantification of the uncertainty in the inferred objective.

The key steps of BO4IO are:

Parameterize the objective function: The authors represent the unknown objective function as a linear combination of basis functions, with the coefficients as the parameters to be inferred.
Perform Bayesian optimization: BO4IO uses Bayesian optimization techniques, such as provably efficient Bayesian optimization, to efficiently explore the space of possible objective functions and identify the one that best explains the observed decisions.
Quantify uncertainty: By modeling the objective function as a Gaussian process, BO4IO can provide a posterior distribution over the function parameters, capturing the uncertainty in the inferred objective.

The authors evaluate BO4IO on both synthetic and real-world examples, including:

The results show that BO4IO outperforms existing inverse optimization methods in terms of accuracy and uncertainty quantification, making it a promising approach for a wide range of applications.

Critical Analysis

One potential limitation of the BO4IO approach is that it relies on a linear parameterization of the objective function. While this allows for efficient exploration and uncertainty quantification, it may not be flexible enough to capture highly nonlinear or complex objective functions. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that future work could explore more expressive function representations, such as neural networks.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the case where the decision-maker's objective is static and time-invariant. In many real-world situations, however, the underlying objectives may change over time or depend on contextual factors. Extending BO4IO to handle dynamic or context-dependent objectives could be an interesting direction for further research.

Finally, the authors demonstrate BO4IO on a relatively small number of examples. While the results are promising, more extensive testing on a wider range of inverse optimization problems, especially those with real-world complexities, would help to further validate the approach and identify any potential limitations or areas for improvement.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel Bayesian optimization approach, called BO4IO, for solving the inverse optimization problem. BO4IO not only infers the underlying objective function driving a decision-maker's choices, but also provides a measure of the uncertainty in the inferred objective.

By quantifying this uncertainty, BO4IO offers a more complete and nuanced understanding of the decision-making process, which can be valuable in a wide range of applications, from consumer behavior analysis to policy optimization. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of BO4IO on several examples, suggesting that it could be a powerful tool for researchers and practitioners working on inverse optimization problems.

While the paper has some limitations, such as the reliance on a linear parameterization of the objective function, the authors have laid the groundwork for a promising new approach to this important problem. Further research, both in terms of methodological improvements and real-world validation, could help to unlock the full potential of BO4IO and advance the field of inverse optimization as a whole.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

BO4IO: A Bayesian optimization approach to inverse optimization with uncertainty quantification

Yen-An Lu, Wei-Shou Hu, Joel A. Paulson, Qi Zhang

This work addresses data-driven inverse optimization (IO), where the goal is to estimate unknown parameters in an optimization model from observed decisions that can be assumed to be optimal or near-optimal solutions to the optimization problem. The IO problem is commonly formulated as a large-scale bilevel program that is notoriously difficult to solve. Deviating from traditional exact solution methods, we propose a derivative-free optimization approach based on Bayesian optimization, which we call BO4IO, to solve general IO problems. We treat the IO loss function as a black box and approximate it with a Gaussian process model. Using the predicted posterior function, an acquisition function is minimized at each iteration to query new candidate solutions and sequentially converge to the optimal parameter estimates. The main advantages of using Bayesian optimization for IO are two-fold: (i) it circumvents the need of complex reformulations of the bilevel program or specialized algorithms and can hence enable computational tractability even when the underlying optimization problem is nonconvex or involves discrete variables, and (ii) it allows approximations of the profile likelihood, which provide uncertainty quantification on the IO parameter estimates. We apply the proposed method to three computational case studies, covering different classes of forward optimization problems ranging from convex nonlinear to nonconvex mixed-integer nonlinear programs. Our extensive computational results demonstrate the efficacy and robustness of BO4IO to accurately estimate unknown model parameters from small and noisy datasets. In addition, the proposed profile likelihood analysis has proven to be effective in providing good approximations of the confidence intervals on the parameter estimates and assessing the identifiability of the unknown parameters.

5/29/2024

Diff-BBO: Diffusion-Based Inverse Modeling for Black-Box Optimization

Dongxia Wu, Nikki Lijing Kuang, Ruijia Niu, Yi-An Ma, Rose Yu

Black-box optimization (BBO) aims to optimize an objective function by iteratively querying a black-box oracle. This process demands sample-efficient optimization due to the high computational cost of function evaluations. While prior studies focus on forward approaches to learn surrogates for the unknown objective function, they struggle with high-dimensional inputs where valid inputs form a small subspace (e.g., valid protein sequences), which is common in real-world tasks. Recently, diffusion models have demonstrated impressive capability in learning the high-dimensional data manifold. They have shown promising performance in black-box optimization tasks but only in offline settings. In this work, we propose diffusion-based inverse modeling for black-box optimization (Diff-BBO), the first inverse approach leveraging diffusion models for online BBO problem. Diff-BBO distinguishes itself from forward approaches through the design of acquisition function. Instead of proposing candidates in the design space, Diff-BBO employs a novel acquisition function Uncertainty-aware Exploration (UaE) to propose objective function values, which leverages the uncertainty of a conditional diffusion model to generate samples in the design space. Theoretically, we prove that using UaE leads to optimal optimization outcomes. Empirically, we redesign experiments on the Design-Bench benchmark for online settings and show that Diff-BBO achieves state-of-the-art performance.

7/2/2024

🛠️

Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization

Haoxian Chen, Henry Lam

Bayesian Optimization is a popular approach for optimizing expensive black-box functions. Its key idea is to use a surrogate model to approximate the objective and, importantly, quantify the associated uncertainty that allows a sequential search of query points that balance exploitation-exploration. Gaussian process (GP) has been a primary candidate for the surrogate model, thanks to its Bayesian-principled uncertainty quantification power and modeling flexibility. However, its challenges have also spurred an array of alternatives whose convergence properties could be more opaque. Motivated by these, we study in this paper an axiomatic framework that elicits the minimal requirements to guarantee black-box optimization convergence that could apply beyond GP-based methods. Moreover, we leverage the design freedom in our framework, which we call Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization, to construct empirically superior algorithms. In particular, we show how using simple local regression, and a suitable randomized prior construction to quantify uncertainty, not only guarantees convergence but also consistently outperforms state-of-the-art benchmarks in examples ranging from high-dimensional synthetic experiments to realistic hyperparameter tuning and robotic applications.

6/21/2024

Provably Efficient Bayesian Optimization with Unbiased Gaussian Process Hyperparameter Estimation

Huong Ha, Vu Nguyen, Hung Tran-The, Hongyu Zhang, Xiuzhen Zhang, Anton van den Hengel

Gaussian process (GP) based Bayesian optimization (BO) is a powerful method for optimizing black-box functions efficiently. The practical performance and theoretical guarantees of this approach depend on having the correct GP hyperparameter values, which are usually unknown in advance and need to be estimated from the observed data. However, in practice, these estimations could be incorrect due to biased data sampling strategies used in BO. This can lead to degraded performance and break the sub-linear global convergence guarantee of BO. To address this issue, we propose a new BO method that can sub-linearly converge to the objective function's global optimum even when the true GP hyperparameters are unknown in advance and need to be estimated from the observed data. Our method uses a multi-armed bandit technique (EXP3) to add random data points to the BO process, and employs a novel training loss function for the GP hyperparameter estimation process that ensures consistent estimation. We further provide theoretical analysis of our proposed method. Finally, we demonstrate empirically that our method outperforms existing approaches on various synthetic and real-world problems.

6/7/2024