Improved bounds for calibration via stronger sign preservation games

Read original: arXiv:2406.13668 - Published 8/15/2024 by Yuval Dagan, Constantinos Daskalakis, Maxwell Fishelson, Noah Golowich, Robert Kleinberg, Princewill Okoroafor

⚙️

Overview

This paper presents new theoretical bounds for the calibration error of sequential prediction algorithms.
The authors introduce a stronger version of the "sign preservation game" used in previous work, which leads to tighter bounds on calibration error.
The paper builds upon research on distance from calibration, prediction to minimize swap regret, online calibrated conformal prediction, forecasting swap regret, and calibrated regression against an adversary.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a problem called "sequential calibration," which is about making predictions that are well-calibrated over time. Well-calibrated predictions are important in many applications, like weather forecasting or medical diagnosis, where you want the predicted probability to match the true probability of an event happening.

The authors introduce a new mathematical framework called the "stronger sign preservation game" to analyze the calibration properties of sequential prediction algorithms. This framework allows them to prove tighter bounds on the calibration error of these algorithms compared to previous work.

The key idea is that the new game is "stronger" in the sense that it puts more restrictions on the algorithm's ability to make predictions. This results in improved theoretical guarantees on the algorithm's calibration performance.

The paper builds on and extends several previous studies in this area, providing a more comprehensive theoretical understanding of the calibration properties of sequential prediction algorithms.

Technical Explanation

The paper studies the problem of sequential calibration, where a prediction algorithm must make a sequence of probability forecasts that are well-calibrated over time. The authors introduce a new framework called the "stronger sign preservation game" to analyze the calibration properties of these algorithms.

The key technical contribution is a set of new theorems that provide tighter bounds on the calibration error of sequential prediction algorithms, compared to previous work. These bounds are derived by analyzing the stronger sign preservation game, which imposes additional constraints on the algorithm's prediction behavior.

Specifically, the authors show that if the algorithm's predictions satisfy certain "sign preservation" conditions in the stronger game, then its calibration error can be upper bounded in terms of the game's parameter values. This leads to improved theoretical guarantees compared to the previous "standard" sign preservation game used in the literature.

The paper also discusses connections to related work on topics like distance from calibration, prediction to minimize swap regret, online calibrated conformal prediction, forecasting swap regret, and calibrated regression against an adversary.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a strong theoretical analysis of sequential calibration, but it is important to note some caveats and limitations:

The theoretical bounds derived in the paper depend on certain assumptions about the prediction algorithm's behavior, which may not always hold in practice.
The analysis is focused on the worst-case scenario, and the bounds may be overly conservative for many real-world applications.
The paper does not provide any empirical validation of the improved theoretical bounds, so their practical significance is not yet clear.

Additionally, while the authors discuss connections to related work, the paper does not explicitly compare its results to these other studies, which could help contextualize the contributions.

Overall, the paper presents an interesting new framework for analyzing sequential calibration, but further research is needed to understand its broader implications and practical relevance.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a new "stronger sign preservation game" framework for analyzing the calibration properties of sequential prediction algorithms. By deriving tighter theoretical bounds on calibration error using this framework, the authors provide a more comprehensive understanding of the fundamental limits of sequential calibration.

The work builds on and extends previous research in this area, offering a potentially valuable tool for designing and analyzing prediction algorithms with strong calibration guarantees. While the theoretical analysis is promising, future empirical validation and comparison to other approaches would help clarify the practical significance of the proposed methods.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

⚙️

Improved bounds for calibration via stronger sign preservation games

Yuval Dagan, Constantinos Daskalakis, Maxwell Fishelson, Noah Golowich, Robert Kleinberg, Princewill Okoroafor

A set of probabilistic forecasts is calibrated if each prediction of the forecaster closely approximates the empirical distribution of outcomes on the subset of timesteps where that prediction was made. We study the fundamental problem of online calibrated forecasting of binary sequences, which was initially studied by Foster & Vohra (1998). They derived an algorithm with $O(T^{2/3})$ calibration error after $T$ time steps, and showed a lower bound of $Omega(T^{1/2})$. These bounds remained stagnant for two decades, until Qiao & Valiant (2021) improved the lower bound to $Omega(T^{0.528})$ by introducing a combinatorial game called sign preservation and showing that lower bounds for this game imply lower bounds for calibration. In this paper, we give the first improvement to the $O(T^{2/3})$ upper bound on calibration error of Foster & Vohra. We do this by introducing a variant of Qiao & Valiant's game that we call sign preservation with reuse (SPR). We prove that the relationship between SPR and calibrated forecasting is bidirectional: not only do lower bounds for SPR translate into lower bounds for calibration, but algorithms for SPR also translate into new algorithms for calibrated forecasting. We then give an improved emph{upper bound} for the SPR game, which implies, via our equivalence, a forecasting algorithm with calibration error $O(T^{2/3 - varepsilon})$ for some $varepsilon > 0$, improving Foster & Vohra's upper bound for the first time. Using similar ideas, we then prove a slightly stronger lower bound than that of Qiao & Valiant, namely $Omega(T^{0.54389})$. Our lower bound is obtained by an oblivious adversary, marking the first $omega(T^{1/2})$ calibration lower bound for oblivious adversaries.

8/15/2024

📶

On the Distance from Calibration in Sequential Prediction

Mingda Qiao, Letian Zheng

We study a sequential binary prediction setting where the forecaster is evaluated in terms of the calibration distance, which is defined as the $L_1$ distance between the predicted values and the set of predictions that are perfectly calibrated in hindsight. This is analogous to a calibration measure recently proposed by B{l}asiok, Gopalan, Hu and Nakkiran (STOC 2023) for the offline setting. The calibration distance is a natural and intuitive measure of deviation from perfect calibration, and satisfies a Lipschitz continuity property which does not hold for many popular calibration measures, such as the $L_1$ calibration error and its variants. We prove that there is a forecasting algorithm that achieves an $O(sqrt{T})$ calibration distance in expectation on an adversarially chosen sequence of $T$ binary outcomes. At the core of this upper bound is a structural result showing that the calibration distance is accurately approximated by the lower calibration distance, which is a continuous relaxation of the former. We then show that an $O(sqrt{T})$ lower calibration distance can be achieved via a simple minimax argument and a reduction to online learning on a Lipschitz class. On the lower bound side, an $Omega(T^{1/3})$ calibration distance is shown to be unavoidable, even when the adversary outputs a sequence of independent random bits, and has an additional ability to early stop (i.e., to stop producing random bits and output the same bit in the remaining steps). Interestingly, without this early stopping, the forecaster can achieve a much smaller calibration distance of $mathrm{polylog}(T)$.

5/28/2024

🔮

Online Calibrated and Conformal Prediction Improves Bayesian Optimization

Shachi Deshpande, Charles Marx, Volodymyr Kuleshov

Accurate uncertainty estimates are important in sequential model-based decision-making tasks such as Bayesian optimization. However, these estimates can be imperfect if the data violates assumptions made by the model (e.g., Gaussianity). This paper studies which uncertainties are needed in model-based decision-making and in Bayesian optimization, and argues that uncertainties can benefit from calibration -- i.e., an 80% predictive interval should contain the true outcome 80% of the time. Maintaining calibration, however, can be challenging when the data is non-stationary and depends on our actions. We propose using simple algorithms based on online learning to provably maintain calibration on non-i.i.d. data, and we show how to integrate these algorithms in Bayesian optimization with minimal overhead. Empirically, we find that calibrated Bayesian optimization converges to better optima in fewer steps, and we demonstrate improved performance on standard benchmark functions and hyperparameter optimization tasks.

6/27/2024

🤿

Predict to Minimize Swap Regret for All Payoff-Bounded Tasks

Lunjia Hu, Yifan Wu

Calibration allows predictions to be reliably interpreted as probabilities by decision makers. We propose a decision-theoretic calibration error, the Calibration Decision Loss (CDL), defined as the maximum improvement in decision payoff obtained by calibrating the predictions, where the maximum is over all payoff-bounded decision tasks. Vanishing CDL guarantees the payoff loss from miscalibration vanishes simultaneously for all downstream decision tasks. We show separations between CDL and existing calibration error metrics, including the most well-studied metric Expected Calibration Error (ECE). Our main technical contribution is a new efficient algorithm for online calibration that achieves near-optimal $O(frac{log T}{sqrt{T}})$ expected CDL, bypassing the $Omega(T^{-0.472})$ lower bound for ECE by Qiao and Valiant (2021).

9/24/2024