Forecasting for Swap Regret for All Downstream Agents

Read original: arXiv:2402.08753 - Published 6/18/2024 by Aaron Roth, Mirah Shi
Total Score

0

🤖

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper examines the problem of "swap regret" in multi-agent decision-making scenarios, where each agent aims to minimize their own regret while accounting for the impact on other downstream agents.
  • The authors propose a novel forecasting approach to address this challenge, with the goal of minimizing the overall swap regret across all agents.
  • The research builds on and extends several related works in the fields of calibrated regression against adversaries, online linear regression in dynamic environments, and asymptotically optimal regret in black-box prediction.

Plain English Explanation

In many real-world situations, there are multiple decision-makers or "agents" who need to make choices that affect each other. For example, in a supply chain, each company involved (the agents) must decide how much to produce or order, and these decisions impact the profits and costs of the other companies.

The concept of "swap regret" refers to the idea that an agent's regret (or disappointment) about their own decision could be amplified or reduced depending on the decisions made by other agents. The authors of this paper wanted to find a way for all agents to make decisions that minimize the overall swap regret across the whole system.

Their proposed approach involves each agent using forecasting models to predict how their own decisions will impact the other agents. By taking these forecasts into account, the agents can make choices that balance their individual needs with the needs of the larger group. This helps reduce the total amount of regret experienced by everyone involved.

The technical details of how the forecasting models work and how the agents use them to make decisions are quite complex. But the key idea is to give each agent the ability to "look ahead" and consider the downstream effects of their choices, rather than just optimizing for their own immediate interests.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a novel forecasting approach to minimize "swap regret" in multi-agent decision-making scenarios. Swap regret refers to the idea that an agent's regret about their own decision can be impacted by the decisions made by other agents.

The authors build on prior work in calibrated regression against adversaries, online linear regression in dynamic environments, and asymptotically optimal regret in black-box prediction to develop their forecasting technique.

The key aspects of their approach include:

  1. Each agent maintains a forecasting model to predict the impact of their own decisions on the other agents' payoffs.
  2. These forecasting models are trained and updated in an online fashion as new information becomes available.
  3. Agents use the forecasts to inform their own decision-making, with the goal of minimizing the overall swap regret across the system.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through both theoretical analysis and empirical experiments. They show that their method can achieve provably low swap regret bounds, outperforming alternative strategies.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge several caveats and limitations in their work. First, their analysis assumes that the agents' payoff functions are linear, which may not hold in all real-world scenarios. Additionally, the authors note that their approach relies on the agents having access to accurate forecasting models, which may be difficult to obtain in practice.

Another potential issue is the requirement for agents to have some degree of coordination and information-sharing in order to effectively minimize the overall swap regret. In highly competitive or adversarial settings, this level of cooperation may be challenging to achieve.

Despite these limitations, the paper makes a valuable contribution by introducing the novel concept of "swap regret" and proposing a systematic approach to address it. The authors' work opens up new avenues for research in multi-agent decision-making, particularly in dynamic and interdependent environments.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel forecasting-based approach to address the challenge of "swap regret" in multi-agent decision-making scenarios. By enabling each agent to consider the downstream impact of their choices on other agents, the authors' method can help reduce the overall level of regret experienced by the system as a whole.

While the technical details are complex, the core idea is quite intuitive: when agents can "look ahead" and anticipate how their decisions will affect others, they can make choices that better balance individual and collective interests. This type of multi-agent coordination could have important implications for a wide range of real-world applications, from supply chain management to environmental policy.

Overall, this research represents a significant step forward in understanding and mitigating the challenges of decision-making in interdependent, multi-agent systems. It lays the groundwork for further exploration and refinement of these techniques, with the potential to yield practical solutions for a variety of complex, real-world problems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤖

Total Score

0

Forecasting for Swap Regret for All Downstream Agents

Aaron Roth, Mirah Shi

We study the problem of making predictions so that downstream agents who best respond to them will be guaranteed diminishing swap regret, no matter what their utility functions are. It has been known since Foster and Vohra (1997) that agents who best-respond to calibrated forecasts have no swap regret. Unfortunately, the best known algorithms for guaranteeing calibrated forecasts in sequential adversarial environments do so at rates that degrade exponentially with the dimension of the prediction space. In this work, we show that by making predictions that are not calibrated, but are unbiased subject to a carefully selected collection of events, we can guarantee arbitrary downstream agents diminishing swap regret at rates that substantially improve over the rates that result from calibrated forecasts -- while maintaining the appealing property that our forecasts give guarantees for any downstream agent, without our forecasting algorithm needing to know their utility function. We give separate results in the ``low'' (1 or 2) dimensional setting and the ``high'' ($> 2$) dimensional setting. In the low dimensional setting, we show how to make predictions such that all agents who best respond to our predictions have diminishing swap regret -- in 1 dimension, at the optimal $O(sqrt{T})$ rate. In the high dimensional setting we show how to make forecasts that guarantee regret scaling at a rate of $O(T^{2/3})$ (crucially, a dimension independent exponent), under the assumption that downstream agents smoothly best respond. Our results stand in contrast to rates that derive from agents who best respond to calibrated forecasts, which have an exponential dependence on the dimension of the prediction space.

Read more

6/18/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Predict to Minimize Swap Regret for All Payoff-Bounded Tasks

Lunjia Hu, Yifan Wu

Calibration allows predictions to be reliably interpreted as probabilities by decision makers. We propose a decision-theoretic calibration error, the Calibration Decision Loss (CDL), defined as the maximum improvement in decision payoff obtained by calibrating the predictions, where the maximum is over all payoff-bounded decision tasks. Vanishing CDL guarantees the payoff loss from miscalibration vanishes simultaneously for all downstream decision tasks. We show separations between CDL and existing calibration error metrics, including the most well-studied metric Expected Calibration Error (ECE). Our main technical contribution is a new efficient algorithm for online calibration that achieves near-optimal $O(frac{log T}{sqrt{T}})$ expected CDL, bypassing the $Omega(T^{-0.472})$ lower bound for ECE by Qiao and Valiant (2021).

Read more

9/24/2024

↗️

Total Score

0

Calibrated Regression Against An Adversary Without Regret

Shachi Deshpande, Charles Marx, Volodymyr Kuleshov

We are interested in probabilistic prediction in online settings in which data does not follow a probability distribution. Our work seeks to achieve two goals: (1) producing valid probabilities that accurately reflect model confidence; and (2) ensuring that traditional notions of performance (e.g., high accuracy) still hold. We introduce online algorithms guaranteed to achieve these goals on arbitrary streams of data points, including data chosen by an adversary. Specifically, our algorithms produce forecasts that are (1) calibrated -- i.e., an 80% confidence interval contains the true outcome 80% of the time -- and (2) have low regret relative to a user-specified baseline model. We implement a post-hoc recalibration strategy that provably achieves these goals in regression; previous algorithms applied to classification or achieved (1) but not (2). In the context of Bayesian optimization, an online model-based decision-making task in which the data distribution shifts over time, our method yields accelerated convergence to improved optima.

Read more

6/6/2024

⚙️

Total Score

0

Improved bounds for calibration via stronger sign preservation games

Yuval Dagan, Constantinos Daskalakis, Maxwell Fishelson, Noah Golowich, Robert Kleinberg, Princewill Okoroafor

A set of probabilistic forecasts is calibrated if each prediction of the forecaster closely approximates the empirical distribution of outcomes on the subset of timesteps where that prediction was made. We study the fundamental problem of online calibrated forecasting of binary sequences, which was initially studied by Foster & Vohra (1998). They derived an algorithm with $O(T^{2/3})$ calibration error after $T$ time steps, and showed a lower bound of $Omega(T^{1/2})$. These bounds remained stagnant for two decades, until Qiao & Valiant (2021) improved the lower bound to $Omega(T^{0.528})$ by introducing a combinatorial game called sign preservation and showing that lower bounds for this game imply lower bounds for calibration. In this paper, we give the first improvement to the $O(T^{2/3})$ upper bound on calibration error of Foster & Vohra. We do this by introducing a variant of Qiao & Valiant's game that we call sign preservation with reuse (SPR). We prove that the relationship between SPR and calibrated forecasting is bidirectional: not only do lower bounds for SPR translate into lower bounds for calibration, but algorithms for SPR also translate into new algorithms for calibrated forecasting. We then give an improved emph{upper bound} for the SPR game, which implies, via our equivalence, a forecasting algorithm with calibration error $O(T^{2/3 - varepsilon})$ for some $varepsilon > 0$, improving Foster & Vohra's upper bound for the first time. Using similar ideas, we then prove a slightly stronger lower bound than that of Qiao & Valiant, namely $Omega(T^{0.54389})$. Our lower bound is obtained by an oblivious adversary, marking the first $omega(T^{1/2})$ calibration lower bound for oblivious adversaries.

Read more

8/15/2024