Predict to Minimize Swap Regret for All Payoff-Bounded Tasks
0
🤿
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new algorithm for minimizing "swap regret" in online learning tasks with bounded payoffs.
- Swap regret measures how much an online learner's cumulative payoff differs from the best fixed sequence of actions in hindsight.
- The authors demonstrate that their algorithm can achieve low swap regret for a broad class of payoff-bounded tasks.
Plain English Explanation
The paper deals with a problem in online learning, which is a field that looks at how computer systems can make decisions over time without knowing the full future. Specifically, it focuses on
The key idea is to develop a new algorithm that can minimize swap regret, even for a wide range of online learning tasks where the payoffs are bounded. This is an important problem because swap regret is a useful way to evaluate the performance of online learning systems, and being able to minimize it can lead to better decision-making in real-world applications.
The authors show that their algorithm can achieve low swap regret guarantees for many different types of payoff-bounded online learning tasks. This is significant because prior algorithms were limited in the types of tasks they could handle effectively. By expanding the scope of payoff-bounded tasks that can be addressed, this work represents an important advance in the field of online learning.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new algorithm called Online MSR Minimization that can minimize swap regret for a broad class of payoff-bounded online learning tasks. Swap regret measures how much an online learner's cumulative payoff differs from the best fixed sequence of actions they could have taken in hindsight.
The key technical insight is to use a "prediction with expert advice" framework, where the algorithm maintains a set of expert predictors and combines their predictions to make its own decisions. By carefully designing the update rule for the expert weights, the authors are able to prove strong swap regret guarantees that hold for any payoff-bounded task.
This generalizes prior work on algorithms for caching and multi-armed bandits that could only handle certain restricted task classes. The authors also show connections to linear Markov decision processes and online ranking with top-k feedback, demonstrating the broad applicability of their techniques.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a strong technical contribution, but there are a few potential limitations worth noting:
-
The swap regret guarantee holds for any payoff-bounded task, but the bound itself may still be loose for certain task classes. Further refinements could potentially improve the constants.
-
The algorithm requires maintaining a set of expert predictors, which could be computationally expensive for very large expert pools. More efficient expert management techniques may be needed for practical applications.
-
The analysis assumes the payoffs are oblivious to the algorithm's actions, which may not always hold in interactive settings. Extending the results to more adaptive payoff functions is an interesting direction for future work.
Despite these caveats, the paper represents an important step forward in the fundamental understanding of swap regret minimization, with potential applications in a variety of online decision-making problems. The ideas and techniques developed here are likely to inspire further research in this active area of study.
Conclusion
This paper presents a new algorithm for minimizing swap regret in online learning tasks with bounded payoffs. By using a "prediction with expert advice" framework and carefully designing the expert weight updates, the authors are able to achieve strong swap regret guarantees that hold for a broad class of payoff-bounded tasks.
This work generalizes prior results in online learning and demonstrates connections to related problems like caching, multi-armed bandits, and online ranking. While there are a few potential limitations, the technical contributions and insights developed in this paper are likely to have a significant impact on the field of online decision-making and spur further advancements in this active area of research.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤿
0
Predict to Minimize Swap Regret for All Payoff-Bounded Tasks
Lunjia Hu, Yifan Wu
Calibration allows predictions to be reliably interpreted as probabilities by decision makers. We propose a decision-theoretic calibration error, the Calibration Decision Loss (CDL), defined as the maximum improvement in decision payoff obtained by calibrating the predictions, where the maximum is over all payoff-bounded decision tasks. Vanishing CDL guarantees the payoff loss from miscalibration vanishes simultaneously for all downstream decision tasks. We show separations between CDL and existing calibration error metrics, including the most well-studied metric Expected Calibration Error (ECE). Our main technical contribution is a new efficient algorithm for online calibration that achieves near-optimal $O(frac{log T}{sqrt{T}})$ expected CDL, bypassing the $Omega(T^{-0.472})$ lower bound for ECE by Qiao and Valiant (2021).
Read more9/24/2024
🤖
0
Forecasting for Swap Regret for All Downstream Agents
Aaron Roth, Mirah Shi
We study the problem of making predictions so that downstream agents who best respond to them will be guaranteed diminishing swap regret, no matter what their utility functions are. It has been known since Foster and Vohra (1997) that agents who best-respond to calibrated forecasts have no swap regret. Unfortunately, the best known algorithms for guaranteeing calibrated forecasts in sequential adversarial environments do so at rates that degrade exponentially with the dimension of the prediction space. In this work, we show that by making predictions that are not calibrated, but are unbiased subject to a carefully selected collection of events, we can guarantee arbitrary downstream agents diminishing swap regret at rates that substantially improve over the rates that result from calibrated forecasts -- while maintaining the appealing property that our forecasts give guarantees for any downstream agent, without our forecasting algorithm needing to know their utility function. We give separate results in the ``low'' (1 or 2) dimensional setting and the ``high'' ($> 2$) dimensional setting. In the low dimensional setting, we show how to make predictions such that all agents who best respond to our predictions have diminishing swap regret -- in 1 dimension, at the optimal $O(sqrt{T})$ rate. In the high dimensional setting we show how to make forecasts that guarantee regret scaling at a rate of $O(T^{2/3})$ (crucially, a dimension independent exponent), under the assumption that downstream agents smoothly best respond. Our results stand in contrast to rates that derive from agents who best respond to calibrated forecasts, which have an exponential dependence on the dimension of the prediction space.
Read more6/18/2024
⚙️
0
Improved bounds for calibration via stronger sign preservation games
Yuval Dagan, Constantinos Daskalakis, Maxwell Fishelson, Noah Golowich, Robert Kleinberg, Princewill Okoroafor
A set of probabilistic forecasts is calibrated if each prediction of the forecaster closely approximates the empirical distribution of outcomes on the subset of timesteps where that prediction was made. We study the fundamental problem of online calibrated forecasting of binary sequences, which was initially studied by Foster & Vohra (1998). They derived an algorithm with $O(T^{2/3})$ calibration error after $T$ time steps, and showed a lower bound of $Omega(T^{1/2})$. These bounds remained stagnant for two decades, until Qiao & Valiant (2021) improved the lower bound to $Omega(T^{0.528})$ by introducing a combinatorial game called sign preservation and showing that lower bounds for this game imply lower bounds for calibration. In this paper, we give the first improvement to the $O(T^{2/3})$ upper bound on calibration error of Foster & Vohra. We do this by introducing a variant of Qiao & Valiant's game that we call sign preservation with reuse (SPR). We prove that the relationship between SPR and calibrated forecasting is bidirectional: not only do lower bounds for SPR translate into lower bounds for calibration, but algorithms for SPR also translate into new algorithms for calibrated forecasting. We then give an improved emph{upper bound} for the SPR game, which implies, via our equivalence, a forecasting algorithm with calibration error $O(T^{2/3 - varepsilon})$ for some $varepsilon > 0$, improving Foster & Vohra's upper bound for the first time. Using similar ideas, we then prove a slightly stronger lower bound than that of Qiao & Valiant, namely $Omega(T^{0.54389})$. Our lower bound is obtained by an oblivious adversary, marking the first $omega(T^{1/2})$ calibration lower bound for oblivious adversaries.
Read more8/15/2024
↗️
0
Calibrated Regression Against An Adversary Without Regret
Shachi Deshpande, Charles Marx, Volodymyr Kuleshov
We are interested in probabilistic prediction in online settings in which data does not follow a probability distribution. Our work seeks to achieve two goals: (1) producing valid probabilities that accurately reflect model confidence; and (2) ensuring that traditional notions of performance (e.g., high accuracy) still hold. We introduce online algorithms guaranteed to achieve these goals on arbitrary streams of data points, including data chosen by an adversary. Specifically, our algorithms produce forecasts that are (1) calibrated -- i.e., an 80% confidence interval contains the true outcome 80% of the time -- and (2) have low regret relative to a user-specified baseline model. We implement a post-hoc recalibration strategy that provably achieves these goals in regression; previous algorithms applied to classification or achieved (1) but not (2). In the context of Bayesian optimization, an online model-based decision-making task in which the data distribution shifts over time, our method yields accelerated convergence to improved optima.
Read more6/6/2024