Bridging the Empirical-Theoretical Gap in Neural Network Formal Language Learning Using Minimum Description Length
47
🧠
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Neural networks can approximate many tasks well, but they struggle to achieve perfect generalization, even when the correct solution is theoretically possible.
- This paper focuses on the task of formal language learning, examining a simple formal language and showing that the theoretically correct solution is not an optimum of commonly used objectives, even with regularization techniques.
- The paper proposes using the Minimum Description Length (MDL) objective instead, which results in the correct solution being an optimum.
Plain English Explanation
Neural networks are powerful machine learning models that can be trained to perform a wide variety of tasks, such as image recognition, language processing, and network reconstruction. However, even when the correct solution to a problem can be expressed by the neural network's architecture, the model may still fail to generalize perfectly.
In this paper, the researchers focus on the task of formal language learning, which involves teaching a neural network to recognize and generate a specific type of formal language. They show that the theoretically correct solution to this task is not an optimum of the commonly used objective functions, even when using techniques like L1 or L2 regularization, which are supposed to encourage simple, generalizable models.
The researchers propose an alternative approach, using the Minimum Description Length (MDL) objective instead. This objective function encourages the neural network to find the most compressed representation of the data, which in this case leads to the correct solution being an optimum.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores the limitations of neural networks in achieving perfect generalization, even when the correct solution can be expressed by the network's architecture. Using the task of formal language learning as a case study, the researchers examine a simple formal language and show that the theoretically correct solution is not an optimum of commonly used objective functions, such as cross-entropy loss.
The researchers experiment with various regularization techniques, including L1 and L2 regularization, which are often used to encourage simple, generalizable models. However, they find that these techniques do not lead to the correct solution being an optimum.
To address this issue, the researchers propose using the Minimum Description Length (MDL) objective. This objective function encourages the neural network to find the most compressed representation of the data, which in this case results in the correct solution being an optimum.
The paper provides detailed experiments and analyses to support their findings. They compare the performance of neural networks trained with the standard objective functions and the MDL objective on the formal language learning task, demonstrating the superiority of the MDL approach in finding the theoretically correct solution.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises an important issue regarding the limitations of neural networks in achieving perfect generalization, even when the correct solution can be expressed by the network's architecture. This finding challenges the common belief that neural networks can learn any function given enough data and computational resources.
The researchers' use of the formal language learning task as a case study provides a clear and well-defined problem domain to explore this phenomenon. However, it is worth considering whether the insights from this specific task can be generalized to other domains or if there are unique characteristics of formal language learning that contribute to the observed issues.
Additionally, the paper does not extensively discuss the potential reasons why the commonly used objective functions, even with regularization techniques, fail to find the correct solution. Further exploration of the underlying factors and the specific properties of the MDL objective that enable the correct solution to be an optimum could provide deeper insights into the problem.
While the MDL approach is shown to be effective in this particular case, it would be valuable to investigate its performance and generalization across a broader range of tasks and problem domains. Comparative studies with other alternative objective functions or meta-heuristics could also shed light on the relative strengths and weaknesses of the different approaches.
Conclusion
This paper highlights an intriguing challenge in the field of neural network research: the inability of commonly used objective functions to consistently find the theoretically correct solutions, even when the network architecture is capable of representing such solutions.
The researchers' focus on the formal language learning task and their proposal of the Minimum Description Length (MDL) objective as an alternative approach provide a compelling case study and a potential solution to this problem. The findings suggest that the way we formulate and optimize neural network objectives can have a significant impact on the model's ability to generalize correctly.
The insights from this paper have broader implications for the development of more robust and generalizable neural network models, as well as the ongoing quest to understand the fundamental limitations and capabilities of these powerful machine learning techniques. As the field of artificial intelligence continues to evolve, studies like this one will likely play an important role in guiding the research community towards more effective and reliable neural network architectures and training strategies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
47
Bridging the Empirical-Theoretical Gap in Neural Network Formal Language Learning Using Minimum Description Length
Nur Lan, Emmanuel Chemla, Roni Katzir
Neural networks offer good approximation to many tasks but consistently fail to reach perfect generalization, even when theoretical work shows that such perfect solutions can be expressed by certain architectures. Using the task of formal language learning, we focus on one simple formal language and show that the theoretically correct solution is in fact not an optimum of commonly used objectives -- even with regularization techniques that according to common wisdom should lead to simple weights and good generalization (L1, L2) or other meta-heuristics (early-stopping, dropout). On the other hand, replacing standard targets with the Minimum Description Length objective (MDL) results in the correct solution being an optimum.
Read more6/7/2024
1
Network reconstruction via the minimum description length principle
Tiago P. Peixoto
A fundamental problem associated with the task of network reconstruction from dynamical or behavioral data consists in determining the most appropriate model complexity in a manner that prevents overfitting, and produces an inferred network with a statistically justifiable number of edges. The status quo in this context is based on $L_{1}$ regularization combined with cross-validation. However, besides its high computational cost, this commonplace approach unnecessarily ties the promotion of sparsity with weight shrinkage. This combination forces a trade-off between the bias introduced by shrinkage and the network sparsity, which often results in substantial overfitting even after cross-validation. In this work, we propose an alternative nonparametric regularization scheme based on hierarchical Bayesian inference and weight quantization, which does not rely on weight shrinkage to promote sparsity. Our approach follows the minimum description length (MDL) principle, and uncovers the weight distribution that allows for the most compression of the data, thus avoiding overfitting without requiring cross-validation. The latter property renders our approach substantially faster to employ, as it requires a single fit to the complete data. As a result, we have a principled and efficient inference scheme that can be used with a large variety of generative models, without requiring the number of edges to be known in advance. We also demonstrate that our scheme yields systematically increased accuracy in the reconstruction of both artificial and empirical networks. We highlight the use of our method with the reconstruction of interaction networks between microbial communities from large-scale abundance samples involving in the order of $10^{4}$ to $10^{5}$ species, and demonstrate how the inferred model can be used to predict the outcome of interventions in the system.
Read more5/8/2024
🤿
0
A Survey on Statistical Theory of Deep Learning: Approximation, Training Dynamics, and Generative Models
Namjoon Suh, Guang Cheng
In this article, we review the literature on statistical theories of neural networks from three perspectives. In the first part, results on excess risks for neural networks are reviewed in the nonparametric framework of regression or classification. These results rely on explicit constructions of neural networks, leading to fast convergence rates of excess risks, in that tools from the approximation theory are adopted. Through these constructions, the width and depth of the networks can be expressed in terms of sample size, data dimension, and function smoothness. Nonetheless, their underlying analysis only applies to the global minimizer in the highly non-convex landscape of deep neural networks. This motivates us to review the training dynamics of neural networks in the second part. Specifically, we review papers that attempt to answer ``how the neural network trained via gradient-based methods finds the solution that can generalize well on unseen data.'' In particular, two well-known paradigms are reviewed: the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) paradigm, and Mean-Field (MF) paradigm. In the last part, we review the most recent theoretical advancements in generative models including Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), diffusion models, and in-context learning (ICL) in the Large Language Models (LLMs). The former two models are known to be the main pillars of the modern generative AI era, while ICL is a strong capability of LLMs in learning from a few examples in the context. Finally, we conclude the paper by suggesting several promising directions for deep learning theory.
Read more7/8/2024
🧠
0
Learning Neural Network Classifiers with Low Model Complexity
Jayadeva, Himanshu Pant, Mayank Sharma, Abhimanyu Dubey, Sumit Soman, Suraj Tripathi, Sai Guruju, Nihal Goalla
Modern neural network architectures for large-scale learning tasks have substantially higher model complexities, which makes understanding, visualizing and training these architectures difficult. Recent contributions to deep learning techniques have focused on architectural modifications to improve parameter efficiency and performance. In this paper, we derive a continuous and differentiable error functional for a neural network that minimizes its empirical error as well as a measure of the model complexity. The latter measure is obtained by deriving a differentiable upper bound on the Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension of the classifier layer of a class of deep networks. Using standard backpropagation, we realize a training rule that tries to minimize the error on training samples, while improving generalization by keeping the model complexity low. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our formulation (the Low Complexity Neural Network - LCNN) across several deep learning algorithms, and a variety of large benchmark datasets. We show that hidden layer neurons in the resultant networks learn features that are crisp, and in the case of image datasets, quantitatively sharper. Our proposed approach yields benefits across a wide range of architectures, in comparison to and in conjunction with methods such as Dropout and Batch Normalization, and our results strongly suggest that deep learning techniques can benefit from model complexity control methods such as the LCNN learning rule.
Read more7/23/2024