Bringing Auto-tuning to HIP: Analysis of Tuning Impact and Difficulty on AMD and Nvidia GPUs
7
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper analyzes the impact and difficulty of auto-tuning on AMD and NVIDIA GPUs using the HIP programming model.
- Auto-tuning is the process of automatically optimizing software parameters to improve performance on different hardware.
- The researchers evaluate the performance benefits of auto-tuning and the challenges of implementing it for HIP, a programming model that supports both AMD and NVIDIA GPUs.
Plain English Explanation
Auto-tuning is a technique that can help software run faster on different types of computer hardware, like AMD and NVIDIA graphics processing units (GPUs). This paper looks at how well auto-tuning works for a programming model called HIP, which lets developers write code that can run on both AMD and NVIDIA GPUs.
The researchers measured the performance improvements they could get by automatically tuning the software parameters for different GPU hardware. They also looked at how difficult it is to set up and use auto-tuning for the HIP programming model.
The key findings are that auto-tuning can provide significant performance boosts, but implementing it for HIP comes with some challenges. The paper provides insights that could help developers who want to use auto-tuning to optimize their software for both AMD and NVIDIA GPUs.
Technical Explanation
The researchers evaluated the impact and difficulty of bringing auto-tuning to the HIP programming model. HIP is a programming model that allows developers to write code that can run on both AMD and NVIDIA GPUs.
To measure the performance benefits of auto-tuning, the researchers ran a set of stencil computation benchmarks on AMD and NVIDIA GPUs. They used machine learning techniques to automatically tune the software parameters and found significant performance improvements compared to default settings.
However, the researchers also identified several challenges in implementing auto-tuning for the HIP programming model. These include differences in the GPU architectures, the need for separate tuning processes for AMD and NVIDIA, and the difficulty of predicting optimal tuning parameters across diverse workloads.
The paper provides a comparative evaluation of programming models for stencil computations on AMD and NVIDIA GPUs, highlighting the tradeoffs and complexities involved in bringing auto-tuning to the HIP ecosystem.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the potential benefits and challenges of auto-tuning for the HIP programming model. The researchers acknowledge that while auto-tuning can significantly improve performance, the differences between AMD and NVIDIA GPU architectures make it difficult to implement a unified auto-tuning solution.
One limitation of the study is that it focuses only on stencil computation benchmarks, which may not be representative of all types of GPU workloads. Further research is needed to evaluate the performance impact and tuning challenges for a wider range of applications.
Additionally, the paper does not explore potential solutions or strategies for overcoming the identified challenges. It would be valuable to see the researchers' ideas for how to streamline the auto-tuning process or develop more portable tuning models for heterogeneous GPU environments.
Overall, the paper offers valuable insights for developers and researchers working on auto-tuning techniques for cross-vendor GPU programming models like HIP. The findings highlight the need for continued innovation in this area to unlock the full potential of GPU-accelerated computing.
Conclusion
This paper provides a detailed analysis of the impact and difficulty of bringing auto-tuning to the HIP programming model, which allows developers to write code that can run on both AMD and NVIDIA GPUs. The researchers found that auto-tuning can significantly improve performance, but implementing it for HIP comes with several challenges due to the architectural differences between AMD and NVIDIA GPUs.
The findings of this paper are relevant for developers and researchers working on optimizing software for heterogeneous GPU environments. The insights could help guide the development of more effective auto-tuning solutions that can seamlessly support a variety of GPU hardware and programming models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
7
Bringing Auto-tuning to HIP: Analysis of Tuning Impact and Difficulty on AMD and Nvidia GPUs
Milo Lurati, Stijn Heldens, Alessio Sclocco, Ben van Werkhoven
Many studies have focused on developing and improving auto-tuning algorithms for Nvidia Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), but the effectiveness and efficiency of these approaches on AMD devices have hardly been studied. This paper aims to address this gap by introducing an auto-tuner for AMD's HIP. We do so by extending Kernel Tuner, an open-source Python library for auto-tuning GPU programs. We analyze the performance impact and tuning difficulty for four highly-tunable benchmark kernels on four different GPUs: two from Nvidia and two from AMD. Our results demonstrate that auto-tuning has a significantly higher impact on performance on AMD compared to Nvidia (10x vs 2x). Additionally, we show that applications tuned for Nvidia do not perform optimally on AMD, underscoring the importance of auto-tuning specifically for AMD to achieve high performance on these GPUs.
Read more7/17/2024
🚀
2
Stencil Computations on AMD and Nvidia Graphics Processors: Performance and Tuning Strategies
Johannes Pekkila, Oskar Lappi, Fredrik Roberts'en, Maarit J. Korpi-Lagg
Over the last ten years, graphics processors have become the de facto accelerator for data-parallel tasks in various branches of high-performance computing, including machine learning and computational sciences. However, with the recent introduction of AMD-manufactured graphics processors to the world's fastest supercomputers, tuning strategies established for previous hardware generations must be re-evaluated. In this study, we evaluate the performance and energy efficiency of stencil computations on modern datacenter graphics processors, and propose a tuning strategy for fusing cache-heavy stencil kernels. The studied cases comprise both synthetic and practical applications, which involve the evaluation of linear and nonlinear stencil functions in one to three dimensions. Our experiments reveal that AMD and Nvidia graphics processors exhibit key differences in both hardware and software, necessitating platform-specific tuning to reach their full computational potential.
Read more6/14/2024
0
Taking GPU Programming Models to Task for Performance Portability
Joshua H. Davis, Pranav Sivaraman, Joy Kitson, Konstantinos Parasyris, Harshitha Menon, Isaac Minn, Giorgis Georgakoudis, Abhinav Bhatele
Portability is critical to ensuring high productivity in developing and maintaining scientific software as the diversity in on-node hardware architectures increases. While several programming models provide portability for diverse GPU platforms, they don't make any guarantees about performance portability. In this work, we explore several programming models -- CUDA, HIP, Kokkos, RAJA, OpenMP, OpenACC, and SYCL, to study if the performance of these models is consistently good across NVIDIA and AMD GPUs. We use five proxy applications from different scientific domains, create implementations where missing, and use them to present a comprehensive comparative evaluation of the programming models. We provide a Spack scripting-based methodology to ensure reproducibility of experiments conducted in this work. Finally, we attempt to answer the question -- to what extent does each programming model provide performance portability for heterogeneous systems in real-world usage?
Read more5/22/2024
0
Optimal Kernel Tuning Parameter Prediction using Deep Sequence Models
Khawir Mahmood, Jehandad Khan, Hammad Afzal
GPU kernels have come to the forefront of comput- ing due to their utility in varied fields, from high-performance computing to machine learning. A typical GPU compute kernel is invoked millions, if not billions of times in a typical application, which makes their performance highly critical. Due to the unknown nature of the optimization surface, an exhaustive search is required to discover the global optimum, which is infeasible due to the possible exponential number of parameter combinations. In this work, we propose a methodology that uses deep sequence- to-sequence models to predict the optimal tuning parameters governing compute kernels. This work considers the prediction of kernel parameters as a sequence to the sequence translation problem, borrowing models from the Natural Language Process- ing (NLP) domain. Parameters describing the input, output and weight tensors are considered as the input language to the model that emits the corresponding kernel parameters. In essence, the model translates the problem parameter language to kernel parameter language. The core contributions of this work are: a) Proposing that a sequence to sequence model can accurately learn the performance dynamics of a GPU compute kernel b) A novel network architecture which predicts the kernel tuning parameters for GPU kernels, c) A constrained beam search which incorporates the physical limits of the GPU hardware as well as other expert knowledge reducing the search space. The proposed algorithm can achieve more than 90% accuracy on various convolutional kernels in MIOpen, the AMD machine learning primitives library. As a result, the proposed technique can reduce the development time and compute resources required to tune unseen input configurations, resulting in shorter development cycles, reduced development costs, and better user experience.
Read more4/17/2024