Calibration-then-Calculation: A Variance Reduced Metric Framework in Deep Click-Through Rate Prediction Models
2401.16692
0
0
Abstract
The adoption of deep learning across various fields has been extensive, yet there is a lack of focus on evaluating the performance of deep learning pipelines. Typically, with the increased use of large datasets and complex models, the training process is run only once and the result is compared to previous benchmarks. This practice can lead to imprecise comparisons due to the variance in neural network evaluation metrics, which stems from the inherent randomness in the training process. Traditional solutions, such as running the training process multiple times, are often infeasible due to computational constraints. In this paper, we introduce a novel metric framework, the Calibrated Loss Metric, designed to address this issue by reducing the variance present in its conventional counterpart. Consequently, this new metric enhances the accuracy in detecting effective modeling improvements. Our approach is substantiated by theoretical justifications and extensive experimental validations within the context of Deep Click-Through Rate Prediction Models.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a "calibration-then-calculation" framework to improve the variance reduction in deep click-through rate (CTR) prediction models.
- The framework involves two steps: 1) calibrating the model's output to obtain well-calibrated probabilities, and 2) using these calibrated probabilities to calculate a new metric that has lower variance than traditional metrics.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several benchmark datasets and show that it outperforms existing methods in terms of variance reduction and prediction accuracy.
Plain English Explanation
Click-through rate (CTR) prediction is an important task in online advertising, where the goal is to estimate the probability that a user will click on an ad. Deep learning models have become the dominant approach for CTR prediction, but these models can sometimes produce overconfident or miscalibrated probability estimates.
To address this issue, the researchers developed a new "calibration-then-calculation" framework. The first step is calibration, where the model's output probabilities are adjusted to better match the true click probabilities. This helps ensure the model is well-calibrated and not over- or under-confident.
The second step is calculation, where the calibrated probabilities are used to compute a new metric that has lower variance than traditional CTR metrics. This means the new metric provides more stable and reliable estimates, which can be important for optimization and decision-making in real-world applications.
The key idea is that by focusing on calibration first, the authors are able to derive a new metric that leverages the well-calibrated probabilities to achieve better variance reduction. This approach outperformed existing methods on several benchmark datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness for improving the reliability of deep CTR prediction models.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by outlining the problem of click-through rate (CTR) prediction, where the goal is to estimate the probability that a user will click on an ad or content item. Deep learning models have become the dominant approach for this task, but they can sometimes produce overconfident or miscalibrated probability estimates.
To address this issue, the authors propose a new "calibration-then-calculation" framework. The first step is calibration, where the model's output probabilities are adjusted to better match the true click probabilities. This is done using techniques like temperature scaling or Platt scaling.
The second step is calculation, where the calibrated probabilities are used to compute a new metric that has lower variance than traditional CTR metrics. This new metric is derived using analytical results on uncertainty propagation and optimizing for calibration-aware prediction correctness.
The key idea is that by focusing on calibration first, the authors are able to derive a new metric that leverages the well-calibrated probabilities to achieve better variance reduction. This is important because high-variance metrics can make it difficult to optimize and make reliable decisions in real-world applications.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several benchmark datasets, showing that it outperforms existing methods in terms of both variance reduction and prediction accuracy.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the importance of calibration in deep CTR prediction models and presents a novel framework to address this issue. The authors provide a thorough theoretical analysis and experimental validation, which is a strength of the work.
However, the paper does not discuss any potential limitations or caveats of the proposed approach. For example, it's unclear how the framework would scale to larger or more complex datasets, or how sensitive the results are to hyperparameter tuning or architectural choices.
Additionally, the authors do not compare their method to other recent developments in the field, such as calibration-aware Bayesian learning or lightweight measures of classification difficulty. It would be helpful to understand how the "calibration-then-calculation" framework compares to these alternative approaches.
Overall, the paper presents a promising direction for improving the reliability of deep CTR prediction models, but further research is needed to fully understand the strengths, limitations, and broader implications of this work.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a "calibration-then-calculation" framework for deep click-through rate (CTR) prediction models. By first calibrating the model's output probabilities to be well-calibrated, the authors are able to derive a new metric that has lower variance than traditional CTR metrics.
The key contribution of this work is the novel two-step approach that leverages calibration to enhance the reliability and stability of CTR predictions. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their method on several benchmark datasets, suggesting it could be a valuable tool for improving the performance of deep CTR prediction models in real-world applications.
While the paper provides a strong theoretical and experimental foundation, further research is needed to fully understand the limitations and broader implications of this framework. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step forward in addressing the challenge of overconfident or miscalibrated probability estimates in deep learning for online advertising and content recommendation.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Reassessing How to Compare and Improve the Calibration of Machine Learning Models
Muthu Chidambaram, Rong Ge
0
0
A machine learning model is calibrated if its predicted probability for an outcome matches the observed frequency for that outcome conditional on the model prediction. This property has become increasingly important as the impact of machine learning models has continued to spread to various domains. As a result, there are now a dizzying number of recent papers on measuring and improving the calibration of (specifically deep learning) models. In this work, we reassess the reporting of calibration metrics in the recent literature. We show that there exist trivial recalibration approaches that can appear seemingly state-of-the-art unless calibration and prediction metrics (i.e. test accuracy) are accompanied by additional generalization metrics such as negative log-likelihood. We then derive a calibration-based decomposition of Bregman divergences that can be used to both motivate a choice of calibration metric based on a generalization metric, and to detect trivial calibration. Finally, we apply these ideas to develop a new extension to reliability diagrams that can be used to jointly visualize calibration as well as the estimated generalization error of a model.
6/7/2024
🤿
Calibration in Deep Learning: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art
Cheng Wang
0
0
Calibrating deep neural models plays an important role in building reliable, robust AI systems in safety-critical applications. Recent work has shown that modern neural networks that possess high predictive capability are poorly calibrated and produce unreliable model predictions. Though deep learning models achieve remarkable performance on various benchmarks, the study of model calibration and reliability is relatively underexplored. Ideal deep models should have not only high predictive performance but also be well calibrated. There have been some recent advances in calibrating deep models. In this survey, we review the state-of-the-art calibration methods and their principles for performing model calibration. First, we start with the definition of model calibration and explain the root causes of model miscalibration. Then we introduce the key metrics that can measure this aspect. It is followed by a summary of calibration methods that we roughly classify into four categories: post-hoc calibration, regularization methods, uncertainty estimation, and composition methods. We also cover recent advancements in calibrating large models, particularly large language models (LLMs). Finally, we discuss some open issues, challenges, and potential directions.
5/13/2024
Quantifying Variance in Evaluation Benchmarks
Lovish Madaan, Aaditya K. Singh, Rylan Schaeffer, Andrew Poulton, Sanmi Koyejo, Pontus Stenetorp, Sharan Narang, Dieuwke Hupkes
0
0
Evaluation benchmarks are the cornerstone of measuring capabilities of large language models (LLMs), as well as driving progress in said capabilities. Originally designed to make claims about capabilities (or lack thereof) in fully pretrained models, evaluation benchmarks are now also extensively used to decide between various training choices. Despite this widespread usage, we rarely quantify the variance in our evaluation benchmarks, which dictates whether differences in performance are meaningful. Here, we define and measure a range of metrics geared towards measuring variance in evaluation benchmarks, including seed variance across initialisations, and monotonicity during training. By studying a large number of models -- both openly available and pretrained from scratch -- we provide empirical estimates for a variety of variance metrics, with considerations and recommendations for practitioners. We also evaluate the utility and tradeoffs of continuous versus discrete performance measures and explore options for better understanding and reducing this variance. We find that simple changes, such as framing choice tasks (like MMLU) as completion tasks, can often reduce variance for smaller scale ($sim$7B) models, while more involved methods inspired from human testing literature (such as item analysis and item response theory) struggle to meaningfully reduce variance. Overall, our work provides insights into variance in evaluation benchmarks, suggests LM-specific techniques to reduce variance, and more generally encourages practitioners to carefully factor in variance when comparing models.
6/17/2024
🧠
On Measuring Calibration of Discrete Probabilistic Neural Networks
Spencer Young, Porter Jenkins
0
0
As machine learning systems become increasingly integrated into real-world applications, accurately representing uncertainty is crucial for enhancing their safety, robustness, and reliability. Training neural networks to fit high-dimensional probability distributions via maximum likelihood has become an effective method for uncertainty quantification. However, such models often exhibit poor calibration, leading to overconfident predictions. Traditional metrics like Expected Calibration Error (ECE) and Negative Log Likelihood (NLL) have limitations, including biases and parametric assumptions. This paper proposes a new approach using conditional kernel mean embeddings to measure calibration discrepancies without these biases and assumptions. Preliminary experiments on synthetic data demonstrate the method's potential, with future work planned for more complex applications.
5/22/2024