Can Large Language Models Address Open-Target Stance Detection?
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) can effectively address the challenge of open-target stance detection.
- Open-target stance detection involves identifying the stance (e.g., support, opposition) of a text towards a target that is not explicitly mentioned.
- This is a complex task that requires reasoning about implicit relationships and context.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores whether powerful language models, known as large language models (LLMs), can be used to tackle the challenge of open-target stance detection. Open-target stance detection is the task of determining someone's opinion or stance (e.g., whether they support or oppose something) towards a target that is not directly mentioned in the text.
This is a difficult problem because it requires understanding the implicit relationships and context in the text, rather than just looking for explicit mentions of targets and opinions. The researchers wanted to see if the advanced language understanding capabilities of LLMs could help address this challenge.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an investigation into using large language models (LLMs) to perform open-target stance detection. Open-target stance detection is the task of identifying the stance (e.g., support, opposition) of a text towards a target that is not explicitly mentioned.
The researchers evaluated the performance of several LLM-based models on benchmark open-target stance detection datasets. They compared the LLM-based approaches to prior state-of-the-art methods that were not based on LLMs. The experiments were designed to assess the models' ability to reason about implicit relationships and context to infer the target and stance.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges some limitations of the research, such as the need for further investigation into the interpretability and explainability of the LLM-based stance detection models. Additionally, the datasets used may not fully capture the complexity of real-world open-target stance detection scenarios.
While the results demonstrate the potential of LLMs for open-target stance detection, there is still room for improvement. Exploring ways to enhance the models' contextual understanding and reasoning capabilities could lead to further advancements in this area. Incorporating domain-specific knowledge or fine-tuning the models on diverse datasets may also help improve their performance.
Conclusion
This paper investigates the use of large language models (LLMs) for open-target stance detection, a challenging task that requires inferring the stance towards a target that is not explicitly mentioned in the text. The results suggest that LLM-based approaches can outperform prior state-of-the-art methods, highlighting the potential of these powerful language models for tackling complex natural language understanding problems.
However, the research also identifies areas for further improvement, such as enhancing the interpretability and contextual reasoning capabilities of the models. Continued advancements in this direction could have significant implications for applications like social media analysis, opinion mining, and decision support systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Can Large Language Models Address Open-Target Stance Detection?
Abu Ubaida Akash, Ahmed Fahmy, Amine Trabelsi
Stance detection (SD) assesses a text's position towards a target, typically labeled as favor, against, or neutral. We introduce Open-Target Stance Detection (OTSD), where targets are neither seen during training nor provided as input. Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-3.5, GPT-4o, Llama 3, and Mistral, we compare their performance with the Target-Stance Extraction (TSE) approach, which has the advantage of using predefined targets. LLMs perform better than TSE in target generation when the real target is explicitly and not explicitly mentioned in the text. For stance detection, LLMs perform better in explicit scenarios but fail in non-explicit ones.
Read more9/11/2024
🔎
0
Stance Detection on Social Media with Fine-Tuned Large Language Models
.Ilker Gul, R'emi Lebret, Karl Aberer
Stance detection, a key task in natural language processing, determines an author's viewpoint based on textual analysis. This study evaluates the evolution of stance detection methods, transitioning from early machine learning approaches to the groundbreaking BERT model, and eventually to modern Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, LLaMa-2, and Mistral-7B. While ChatGPT's closed-source nature and associated costs present challenges, the open-source models like LLaMa-2 and Mistral-7B offers an encouraging alternative. Initially, our research focused on fine-tuning ChatGPT, LLaMa-2, and Mistral-7B using several publicly available datasets. Subsequently, to provide a comprehensive comparison, we assess the performance of these models in zero-shot and few-shot learning scenarios. The results underscore the exceptional ability of LLMs in accurately detecting stance, with all tested models surpassing existing benchmarks. Notably, LLaMa-2 and Mistral-7B demonstrate remarkable efficiency and potential for stance detection, despite their smaller sizes compared to ChatGPT. This study emphasizes the potential of LLMs in stance detection and calls for more extensive research in this field.
Read more4/19/2024
0
Chain of Stance: Stance Detection with Large Language Models
Junxia Ma, Changjiang Wang, Hanwen Xing, Dongming Zhao, Yazhou Zhang
Stance detection is an active task in natural language processing (NLP) that aims to identify the author's stance towards a particular target within a text. Given the remarkable language understanding capabilities and encyclopedic prior knowledge of large language models (LLMs), how to explore the potential of LLMs in stance detection has received significant attention. Unlike existing LLM-based approaches that focus solely on fine-tuning with large-scale datasets, we propose a new prompting method, called textit{Chain of Stance} (CoS). In particular, it positions LLMs as expert stance detectors by decomposing the stance detection process into a series of intermediate, stance-related assertions that culminate in the final judgment. This approach leads to significant improvements in classification performance. We conducted extensive experiments using four SOTA LLMs on the SemEval 2016 dataset, covering the zero-shot and few-shot learning setups. The results indicate that the proposed method achieves state-of-the-art results with an F1 score of 79.84 in the few-shot setting.
Read more8/12/2024
0
Advancing Annotation of Stance in Social Media Posts: A Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models and Crowd Sourcing
Mao Li, Frederick Conrad
In the rapidly evolving landscape of Natural Language Processing (NLP), the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for automated text annotation in social media posts has garnered significant interest. Despite the impressive innovations in developing LLMs like ChatGPT, their efficacy, and accuracy as annotation tools are not well understood. In this paper, we analyze the performance of eight open-source and proprietary LLMs for annotating the stance expressed in social media posts, benchmarking their performance against human annotators' (i.e., crowd-sourced) judgments. Additionally, we investigate the conditions under which LLMs are likely to disagree with human judgment. A significant finding of our study is that the explicitness of text expressing a stance plays a critical role in how faithfully LLMs' stance judgments match humans'. We argue that LLMs perform well when human annotators do, and when LLMs fail, it often corresponds to situations in which human annotators struggle to reach an agreement. We conclude with recommendations for a comprehensive approach that combines the precision of human expertise with the scalability of LLM predictions. This study highlights the importance of improving the accuracy and comprehensiveness of automated stance detection, aiming to advance these technologies for more efficient and unbiased analysis of social media.
Read more6/12/2024