Chain of Stance: Stance Detection with Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces a new approach called "Chain of Stance" for stance detection using large language models.
- Stance detection is the task of identifying a person's position or attitude towards a given topic.
- The proposed method aims to improve upon existing techniques by leveraging the capabilities of large language models.
Plain English Explanation
The research paper discusses a new way to determine someone's stance or opinion on a particular topic. This is known as "stance detection," and it's an important task in fields like social media analysis and political science.
The key idea behind the "Chain of Stance" approach is to use large language models - powerful AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data. These models can understand the nuanced meaning and context of language, which can be helpful for accurately detecting someone's stance on a given issue.
The researchers explain how their method works by linking to the "Technical Explanation" section. In essence, they've developed a system that can analyze the language used in a piece of text and infer the author's stance or position on the topic being discussed.
This could be useful for all sorts of applications, like identifying misinformation on social media or understanding the dynamics of political debates. By being able to quickly and accurately detect people's stances, we can gain valuable insights into what they think and why.
Technical Explanation
The "Chain of Stance" approach leverages the capabilities of large language models, such as GPT-3, to perform stance detection. The key steps are:
- Prompt Engineering: The researchers carefully craft prompts that allow the language model to infer the stance expressed in a given text.
- Stance Prediction: The language model is used to predict the stance towards a target topic based on the input text.
- Stance Chaining: The model's predictions are chained together to capture the overall stance expressed across multiple texts or statements.
This approach allows the system to understand the nuanced meaning and context of language, which is crucial for accurately detecting someone's stance on a complex issue. The researchers evaluate their method on several benchmark datasets and show that it outperforms existing stance detection techniques.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge some limitations of their approach. For example, the performance of the system may be dependent on the quality and relevance of the prompts used, which can be challenging to design. Additionally, the method relies on the capabilities of the underlying language model, which may have biases or limitations that could impact the accuracy of the stance predictions.
Another potential issue is that the "Chain of Stance" approach may not capture the full complexity of how people express their opinions and beliefs, especially on controversial or sensitive topics. More research is needed to understand how to effectively model the nuances of human stance-taking behavior.
Conclusion
The "Chain of Stance" approach represents a promising step forward in the field of stance detection. By leveraging the capabilities of large language models, the researchers have developed a system that can more accurately infer people's positions on a wide range of topics.
This technology could have important applications in domains like social media analysis, political science, and content moderation. However, as with any AI system, it's important to be aware of the potential limitations and biases, and to continue exploring ways to improve the accuracy and robustness of stance detection methods.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Chain of Stance: Stance Detection with Large Language Models
Junxia Ma, Changjiang Wang, Hanwen Xing, Dongming Zhao, Yazhou Zhang
Stance detection is an active task in natural language processing (NLP) that aims to identify the author's stance towards a particular target within a text. Given the remarkable language understanding capabilities and encyclopedic prior knowledge of large language models (LLMs), how to explore the potential of LLMs in stance detection has received significant attention. Unlike existing LLM-based approaches that focus solely on fine-tuning with large-scale datasets, we propose a new prompting method, called textit{Chain of Stance} (CoS). In particular, it positions LLMs as expert stance detectors by decomposing the stance detection process into a series of intermediate, stance-related assertions that culminate in the final judgment. This approach leads to significant improvements in classification performance. We conducted extensive experiments using four SOTA LLMs on the SemEval 2016 dataset, covering the zero-shot and few-shot learning setups. The results indicate that the proposed method achieves state-of-the-art results with an F1 score of 79.84 in the few-shot setting.
Read more8/12/2024
🔎
0
Stance Detection on Social Media with Fine-Tuned Large Language Models
.Ilker Gul, R'emi Lebret, Karl Aberer
Stance detection, a key task in natural language processing, determines an author's viewpoint based on textual analysis. This study evaluates the evolution of stance detection methods, transitioning from early machine learning approaches to the groundbreaking BERT model, and eventually to modern Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, LLaMa-2, and Mistral-7B. While ChatGPT's closed-source nature and associated costs present challenges, the open-source models like LLaMa-2 and Mistral-7B offers an encouraging alternative. Initially, our research focused on fine-tuning ChatGPT, LLaMa-2, and Mistral-7B using several publicly available datasets. Subsequently, to provide a comprehensive comparison, we assess the performance of these models in zero-shot and few-shot learning scenarios. The results underscore the exceptional ability of LLMs in accurately detecting stance, with all tested models surpassing existing benchmarks. Notably, LLaMa-2 and Mistral-7B demonstrate remarkable efficiency and potential for stance detection, despite their smaller sizes compared to ChatGPT. This study emphasizes the potential of LLMs in stance detection and calls for more extensive research in this field.
Read more4/19/2024
🔎
0
Stance Detection with Collaborative Role-Infused LLM-Based Agents
Xiaochong Lan, Chen Gao, Depeng Jin, Yong Li
Stance detection automatically detects the stance in a text towards a target, vital for content analysis in web and social media research. Despite their promising capabilities, LLMs encounter challenges when directly applied to stance detection. First, stance detection demands multi-aspect knowledge, from deciphering event-related terminologies to understanding the expression styles in social media platforms. Second, stance detection requires advanced reasoning to infer authors' implicit viewpoints, as stance are often subtly embedded rather than overtly stated in the text. To address these challenges, we design a three-stage framework COLA (short for Collaborative rOle-infused LLM-based Agents) in which LLMs are designated distinct roles, creating a collaborative system where each role contributes uniquely. Initially, in the multidimensional text analysis stage, we configure the LLMs to act as a linguistic expert, a domain specialist, and a social media veteran to get a multifaceted analysis of texts, thus overcoming the first challenge. Next, in the reasoning-enhanced debating stage, for each potential stance, we designate a specific LLM-based agent to advocate for it, guiding the LLM to detect logical connections between text features and stance, tackling the second challenge. Finally, in the stance conclusion stage, a final decision maker agent consolidates prior insights to determine the stance. Our approach avoids extra annotated data and model training and is highly usable. We achieve state-of-the-art performance across multiple datasets. Ablation studies validate the effectiveness of each design role in handling stance detection. Further experiments have demonstrated the explainability and the versatility of our approach. Our approach excels in usability, accuracy, effectiveness, explainability and versatility, highlighting its value.
Read more4/17/2024
0
Can Large Language Models Address Open-Target Stance Detection?
Abu Ubaida Akash, Ahmed Fahmy, Amine Trabelsi
Stance detection (SD) assesses a text's position towards a target, typically labeled as favor, against, or neutral. We introduce Open-Target Stance Detection (OTSD), where targets are neither seen during training nor provided as input. Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-3.5, GPT-4o, Llama 3, and Mistral, we compare their performance with the Target-Stance Extraction (TSE) approach, which has the advantage of using predefined targets. LLMs perform better than TSE in target generation when the real target is explicitly and not explicitly mentioned in the text. For stance detection, LLMs perform better in explicit scenarios but fail in non-explicit ones.
Read more9/11/2024