Can Large Language Models Generate High-quality Patent Claims?

Read original: arXiv:2406.19465 - Published 7/1/2024 by Lekang Jiang, Caiqi Zhang, Pascal A Scherz, Stephan Goetz
Total Score

0

Can Large Language Models Generate High-quality Patent Claims?

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) can generate high-quality patent claims that meet the legal and technical requirements for patent protection.
  • The researchers assess the performance of different LLM-based approaches for generating patent claims and analyze the common errors and limitations of these models.
  • The paper also explores the duality between LLMs as a tool for assisting patent writing and their potential to enable plagiarism, as well as the broader implications of using LLMs in the intellectual property domain.

Plain English Explanation

Patent claims are the key part of a patent that define the invention and its scope. They must be carefully crafted to meet strict legal and technical requirements. This paper explores whether large language models (LLMs) - powerful AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data - can be used to automatically generate high-quality patent claims.

The researchers tested different LLM-based approaches for generating patent claims and analyzed the common errors and limitations of these models. They found that while LLMs can produce patent-like text, the claims often fail to meet the necessary legal and technical standards. The paper also discusses the potential for LLMs to be used both to assist human patent writers and to enable patent plagiarism, highlighting the complex implications of these powerful AI systems in the intellectual property domain.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents several experiments to evaluate the ability of LLMs to generate high-quality patent claims. The researchers used different LLM-based approaches, including fine-tuning pre-trained models on patent data and using prompting techniques to guide the generation. They then assessed the generated claims against legal and technical criteria, such as novelty, enablement, and definiteness.

The results show that while the LLM-generated claims can seem plausible at first glance, they often fail to meet the necessary standards for patentability. Common issues include lack of technical detail, overly broad or ambiguous language, and failure to properly define the invention. The paper also explores the potential for LLMs to be used for plagiarism in the patent domain, as well as their potential to assist human patent writers.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough analysis of the limitations of current LLM-based approaches for generating high-quality patent claims. While the researchers acknowledge that LLMs can produce patent-like text, they clearly demonstrate that the claims often fall short of the legal and technical requirements for patentability.

One potential concern is the risk of LLMs being used to enable patent plagiarism, as the paper discusses. The researchers suggest that further research is needed to understand and mitigate this risk.

Additionally, the paper highlights the broader implications of using LLMs in the intellectual property domain, including their potential to assist human patent writers. This raises interesting questions about the role of AI in the patent process and the potential impacts on innovation and creativity.

Conclusion

Overall, this paper provides a valuable contribution to the understanding of the limitations of using LLMs for generating high-quality patent claims. While the technology shows promise, the researchers' findings suggest that significant improvements are still needed before LLMs can be reliably used in the patent domain.

The paper also highlights the complex interplay between LLMs, intellectual property, and innovation, which will likely be an important area of ongoing research and discussion. As LLMs continue to advance, understanding their capabilities and limitations in specialized domains like patent writing will be crucial for ensuring they are developed and deployed responsibly.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Can Large Language Models Generate High-quality Patent Claims?
Total Score

0

Can Large Language Models Generate High-quality Patent Claims?

Lekang Jiang, Caiqi Zhang, Pascal A Scherz, Stephan Goetz

Large language models (LLMs) have shown exceptional performance across various text generation tasks but remain under-explored in the patent domain, which offers highly structured and precise language. This paper constructs a dataset to investigate the performance of current LLMs in patent claim generation. Our results demonstrate that generating claims based on patent descriptions outperforms previous research relying on abstracts. Interestingly, current patent-specific LLMs perform much worse than state-of-the-art general LLMs, highlighting the necessity for future research on in-domain LLMs. We also find that LLMs can produce high-quality first independent claims, but their performances markedly decrease for subsequent dependent claims. Moreover, fine-tuning can enhance the completeness of inventions' features, conceptual clarity, and feature linkage. Among the tested LLMs, GPT-4 demonstrates the best performance in comprehensive human evaluations by patent experts, with better feature coverage, conceptual clarity, and technical coherence. Despite these capabilities, comprehensive revision and modification are still necessary to pass rigorous patent scrutiny and ensure legal robustness.

Read more

7/1/2024

PatentGPT: A Large Language Model for Intellectual Property
Total Score

0

PatentGPT: A Large Language Model for Intellectual Property

Zilong Bai, Ruiji Zhang, Linqing Chen, Qijun Cai, Yuan Zhong, Cong Wang, Yan Fang, Jie Fang, Jing Sun, Weikuan Wang, Lizhi Zhou, Haoran Hua, Tian Qiu, Chaochao Wang, Cheng Sun, Jianping Lu, Yixin Wang, Yubin Xia, Meng Hu, Haowen Liu, Peng Xu, Licong Xu, Fu Bian, Xiaolong Gu, Lisha Zhang, Weilei Wang, Changyang Tu

In recent years, large language models(LLMs) have attracted significant attention due to their exceptional performance across a multitude of natural language process tasks, and have been widely applied in various fields. However, the application of large language models in the Intellectual Property (IP) domain is challenging due to the strong need for specialized knowledge, privacy protection, processing of extremely long text in this field. In this technical report, we present for the first time a low-cost, standardized procedure for training IP-oriented LLMs, meeting the unique requirements of the IP domain. Using this standard process, we have trained the PatentGPT series models based on open-source pretrained models. By evaluating them on the open-source IP-oriented benchmark MOZIP, our domain-specific LLMs outperforms GPT-4, indicating the effectiveness of the proposed training procedure and the expertise of the PatentGPT models in the IP domain. Remarkably, our model surpassed GPT-4 on the 2019 China Patent Agent Qualification Examination, scoring 65 and matching human expert levels. Additionally, the PatentGPT model, which utilizes the SMoE architecture, achieves performance comparable to that of GPT-4 in the IP domain and demonstrates a better cost-performance ratio on long-text tasks, potentially serving as an alternative to GPT-4 within the IP domain.

Read more

6/6/2024

💬

Total Score

0

PatentGPT: A Large Language Model for Patent Drafting Using Knowledge-based Fine-tuning Method

Runtao Ren, Jian Ma

As humanity stands on the brink of a new era of technological innovation, the ability to rapidly transform creative ideas into protected intellectual property (IP) is more crucial than ever. However, the conventional processes for patent drafting are fraught with challenges, demanding a nuanced understanding of advanced field knowledge and technical concepts. Existing large language models (LLMs), while powerful, often fall short in this IP creation domain due to their lack of specialized knowledge and context-awareness necessary for generating technically accurate patent documents. To bridge this critical gap, we propose a groundbreaking framework for Knowledge Fine-Tuning (KFT) of LLMs, designed to endow AI with the ability to autonomously mine, understand, and apply domain-specific knowledge. Our model, PatentGPT leverages a unique combination of knowledge graph-based pre-training, domain-specific supervised fine-tuning (SFT), and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Through extensive evaluation, PatentGPT has demonstrated outstanding performance, scoring up to approximately 400% higher in patent related benchmark tests compared to state-of-the-art models. By KFT method the model's capability to not only assist but also augment human creativity and innovation, our approach sets a new standard for AI-driven intellectual property generation, paving the way for more efficient and effective invention processes.

Read more

9/4/2024

Can Large Language Models Unlock Novel Scientific Research Ideas?
Total Score

0

Can Large Language Models Unlock Novel Scientific Research Ideas?

Sandeep Kumar, Tirthankar Ghosal, Vinayak Goyal, Asif Ekbal

An idea is nothing more nor less than a new combination of old elements (Young, J.W.). The widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) and publicly available ChatGPT have marked a significant turning point in the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into people's everyday lives. This study explores the capability of LLMs in generating novel research ideas based on information from research papers. We conduct a thorough examination of 4 LLMs in five domains (e.g., Chemistry, Computer, Economics, Medical, and Physics). We found that the future research ideas generated by Claude-2 and GPT-4 are more aligned with the author's perspective than GPT-3.5 and Gemini. We also found that Claude-2 generates more diverse future research ideas than GPT-4, GPT-3.5, and Gemini 1.0. We further performed a human evaluation of the novelty, relevancy, and feasibility of the generated future research ideas. This investigation offers insights into the evolving role of LLMs in idea generation, highlighting both its capability and limitations. Our work contributes to the ongoing efforts in evaluating and utilizing language models for generating future research ideas. We make our datasets and codes publicly available.

Read more

9/11/2024