Can Large Language Models Learn Independent Causal Mechanisms?
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at language modeling and complex reasoning tasks.
- However, they struggle with uncommon settings or distribution shifts, lacking generalization ability.
- Causal models that learn abstract variables and causal relationships can be more robust to changes in the distribution.
- This is due to the existence and use of Independent Causal Mechanisms (ICMs) representing high-level concepts that only sparsely interact.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores how Large Language Models (LLMs) can be improved to demonstrate better generalization ability. While LLMs perform impressively on language modeling and complex reasoning tasks, they struggle when the conditions or data distribution changes. In contrast, causal models that learn abstract variables and causal relationships can be more robust to such changes.
The key reason for this is the existence and use of Independent Causal Mechanisms (ICMs). ICMs represent high-level concepts that only interact with each other in a sparse manner. By applying concepts from causality to learn ICMs within LLMs, the researchers aim to improve the models' out-of-distribution performance on abstract and causal reasoning tasks.
Technical Explanation
The researchers develop a new LLM architecture composed of multiple sparsely interacting language modeling modules. This design is based on the idea of Independent Causal Mechanisms (ICMs), which represent high-level concepts that only interact with each other in a limited way.
By incorporating these causal constraints, the researchers show that the resulting LLM can demonstrate improved out-of-distribution performance on abstract and causal reasoning tasks. The researchers also investigate the level of independence and domain specialization within the LLM, and find that these models rely on pre-trained, partially domain-invariant mechanisms that are resilient to fine-tuning.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to improving the generalization ability of LLMs by incorporating concepts from causality. However, the researchers acknowledge that the causal reasoning capabilities of the resulting models are still limited and require further investigation.
Additionally, the domain specialization and independence of the learned mechanisms within the LLM architecture could be explored in more depth to better understand the model's inner workings and potential limitations.
Conclusion
This research demonstrates the potential benefits of applying causal modeling principles to the design of Large Language Models. By learning Independent Causal Mechanisms within the LLM architecture, the models can exhibit improved generalization and robustness to distribution shifts, which is a crucial step forward in developing more versatile and reliable language AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
Can Large Language Models Learn Independent Causal Mechanisms?
Gael Gendron, Bao Trung Nguyen, Alex Yuxuan Peng, Michael Witbrock, Gillian Dobbie
Despite impressive performance on language modelling and complex reasoning tasks, Large Language Models (LLMs) fall short on the same tasks in uncommon settings or with distribution shifts, exhibiting a lack of generalisation ability. By contrast, systems such as causal models, that learn abstract variables and causal relationships, can demonstrate increased robustness against changes in the distribution. One reason for this success is the existence and use of Independent Causal Mechanisms (ICMs) representing high-level concepts that only sparsely interact. In this work, we apply two concepts from causality to learn ICMs within LLMs. We develop a new LLM architecture composed of multiple sparsely interacting language modelling modules. We show that such causal constraints can improve out-of-distribution performance on abstract and causal reasoning tasks. We also investigate the level of independence and domain specialisation and show that LLMs rely on pre-trained partially domain-invariant mechanisms resilient to fine-tuning.
Read more9/11/2024
0
Large Language Models for Constrained-Based Causal Discovery
Kai-Hendrik Cohrs, Gherardo Varando, Emiliano Diaz, Vasileios Sitokonstantinou, Gustau Camps-Valls
Causality is essential for understanding complex systems, such as the economy, the brain, and the climate. Constructing causal graphs often relies on either data-driven or expert-driven approaches, both fraught with challenges. The former methods, like the celebrated PC algorithm, face issues with data requirements and assumptions of causal sufficiency, while the latter demand substantial time and domain knowledge. This work explores the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) as an alternative to domain experts for causal graph generation. We frame conditional independence queries as prompts to LLMs and employ the PC algorithm with the answers. The performance of the LLM-based conditional independence oracle on systems with known causal graphs shows a high degree of variability. We improve the performance through a proposed statistical-inspired voting schema that allows some control over false-positive and false-negative rates. Inspecting the chain-of-thought argumentation, we find causal reasoning to justify its answer to a probabilistic query. We show evidence that knowledge-based CIT could eventually become a complementary tool for data-driven causal discovery.
Read more6/12/2024
0
Probing Causality Manipulation of Large Language Models
Chenyang Zhang, Haibo Tong, Bin Zhang, Dongyu Zhang
Large language models (LLMs) have shown various ability on natural language processing, including problems about causality. It is not intuitive for LLMs to command causality, since pretrained models usually work on statistical associations, and do not focus on causes and effects in sentences. So that probing internal manipulation of causality is necessary for LLMs. This paper proposes a novel approach to probe causality manipulation hierarchically, by providing different shortcuts to models and observe behaviors. We exploit retrieval augmented generation (RAG) and in-context learning (ICL) for models on a designed causality classification task. We conduct experiments on mainstream LLMs, including GPT-4 and some smaller and domain-specific models. Our results suggest that LLMs can detect entities related to causality and recognize direct causal relationships. However, LLMs lack specialized cognition for causality, merely treating them as part of the global semantic of the sentence.
Read more8/27/2024
💬
4
Causal Reasoning and Large Language Models: Opening a New Frontier for Causality
Emre K{i}c{i}man, Robert Ness, Amit Sharma, Chenhao Tan
The causal capabilities of large language models (LLMs) are a matter of significant debate, with critical implications for the use of LLMs in societally impactful domains such as medicine, science, law, and policy. We conduct a behavorial study of LLMs to benchmark their capability in generating causal arguments. Across a wide range of tasks, we find that LLMs can generate text corresponding to correct causal arguments with high probability, surpassing the best-performing existing methods. Algorithms based on GPT-3.5 and 4 outperform existing algorithms on a pairwise causal discovery task (97%, 13 points gain), counterfactual reasoning task (92%, 20 points gain) and event causality (86% accuracy in determining necessary and sufficient causes in vignettes). We perform robustness checks across tasks and show that the capabilities cannot be explained by dataset memorization alone, especially since LLMs generalize to novel datasets that were created after the training cutoff date. That said, LLMs exhibit unpredictable failure modes, and we discuss the kinds of errors that may be improved and what are the fundamental limits of LLM-based answers. Overall, by operating on the text metadata, LLMs bring capabilities so far understood to be restricted to humans, such as using collected knowledge to generate causal graphs or identifying background causal context from natural language. As a result, LLMs may be used by human domain experts to save effort in setting up a causal analysis, one of the biggest impediments to the widespread adoption of causal methods. Given that LLMs ignore the actual data, our results also point to a fruitful research direction of developing algorithms that combine LLMs with existing causal techniques. Code and datasets are available at https://github.com/py-why/pywhy-llm.
Read more8/21/2024