Can OpenSource beat ChatGPT? -- A Comparative Study of Large Language Models for Text-to-Code Generation

Overview

• This paper presents a comparative study of large language models (LLMs) for text-to-code generation, including the popular model ChatGPT.
• The authors evaluate the performance of several open-source LLMs against ChatGPT across a range of coding-related tasks.
• The goal is to assess whether open-source models can match or even outperform ChatGPT in generating high-quality code from natural language prompts.

Plain English Explanation

The paper examines how well different large language models, including the well-known ChatGPT, can translate natural language prompts into functioning computer code. The researchers tested several open-source (freely available) language models alongside ChatGPT to see if the open-source alternatives could match or even surpass ChatGPT's capabilities in this area.

Large language models are AI systems trained on massive amounts of text data, which allows them to understand and generate human-like language. In recent years, these models have shown impressive abilities in tasks like answering questions, summarizing text, and even writing code. However, most state-of-the-art models like ChatGPT are proprietary, meaning they are owned and controlled by large tech companies.

The authors wanted to investigate whether open-source alternatives - models that are freely available for anyone to use and study - could compete with the performance of ChatGPT when it comes to translating natural language into working computer programs. This could have important implications, as open-source models are generally more transparent and accessible than closed, commercial systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper evaluates the performance of several open-source large language models, including BLOOM, GPT-J, and GPT-NeoX, against the proprietary ChatGPT model across a range of text-to-code generation tasks. The authors developed a benchmark suite consisting of 50 natural language prompts covering various programming domains, such as web development, data analysis, and algorithm implementation.

They fine-tuned the open-source models on a curated dataset of code-comment pairs to specialize them for code generation, while using the default ChatGPT model without any additional fine-tuning. The researchers then measured the models' performance in terms of code quality, functionality, and adherence to the original prompt.

The results show that while ChatGPT generally outperformed the open-source models, the gap was not as large as might be expected. Some of the open-source models, particularly GPT-J and GPT-NeoX, were able to match or even exceed ChatGPT's performance on certain tasks. The authors also found that the open-source models exhibited better generalization capabilities and were less prone to hallucinating irrelevant or incorrect code snippets.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and rigorous evaluation of the text-to-code generation capabilities of several large language models. However, it's important to note that the study has some limitations:

1. The benchmark suite, while diverse, may not fully capture the breadth of real-world coding tasks that these models would be expected to handle.
2. The fine-tuning process for the open-source models may have introduced some bias, and the authors did not explore the impact of different fine-tuning approaches.
3. The study only compared the models' performance on code generation, and did not assess other important factors like model robustness, safety, and bias.

Additionally, while the open-source models showed promising results, it's unclear how they would scale to the level of complexity and performance of ChatGPT, which has access to significantly more training data and computational resources.

Conclusion

This paper presents a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussion around the capabilities of large language models for text-to-code generation. The findings suggest that open-source alternatives can indeed be competitive with proprietary models like ChatGPT, at least in certain tasks and contexts.

The research highlights the potential for open-source models to play a meaningful role in the development of AI-powered coding tools and assistants. As the field of large language models continues to evolve, this study provides a useful benchmark for evaluating the strengths and limitations of different approaches, and underscores the importance of transparency and accessibility in AI development.