Categorical data clustering: 25 years beyond K-modes

    Read original: arXiv:2408.17244 - Published 9/10/2024 by Tai Dinh, Wong Hauchi, Philippe Fournier-Viger, Daniil Lisik, Minh-Quyet Ha, Hieu-Chi Dam, Van-Nam Huynh
    Total Score

    0

    Categorical data clustering: 25 years beyond K-modes

    Sign in to get full access

    or

    If you already have an account, we'll log you in

    Overview

    • This paper provides a comprehensive review of the field of categorical data clustering, focusing on developments since the introduction of the K-modes algorithm 25 years ago.
    • The review examines various data sources and applications of categorical data clustering, as well as discussing key algorithmic advancements in the field.
    • The paper offers a technical explanation of the core concepts and methods in categorical data clustering, as well as a critical analysis of the current state of the research and potential future directions.

    Plain English Explanation

    Clustering is a machine learning technique used to group similar data points together. Categorical data clustering is a specific type of clustering that deals with data that can't be easily represented by numbers, such as text or categories.

    This paper looks at how categorical data clustering has evolved over the past 25 years, since the introduction of a popular clustering algorithm called K-modes. It examines the different types of data and applications that have been explored, as well as the new clustering algorithms that have been developed.

    The paper provides an accessible explanation of the key ideas behind categorical data clustering, using examples to make the technical concepts easier to understand. It also takes a critical look at the current state of the research, noting areas that need more study or have potential limitations.

    Overall, the paper aims to give readers a comprehensive overview of the field of categorical data clustering, highlighting both the progress that has been made and the work that remains to be done.

    Technical Explanation

    The paper begins by discussing the sources of categorical data that are commonly used in clustering applications, such as customer profiles, medical records, and social media data. It then provides an overview of the core concepts and algorithms in categorical data clustering.

    One of the key developments covered is the K-modes algorithm, which was introduced 25 years ago as an extension of the popular K-means clustering method to handle categorical variables. The paper explains how K-modes works by assigning cluster centers that represent the most "typical" members of each cluster, and then iteratively updating these centers and cluster assignments.

    The review also examines more advanced clustering algorithms that have been proposed in recent years, such as those based on information theory, fuzzy logic, and deep learning. These newer methods aim to address limitations of K-modes, like its sensitivity to outliers and its assumption of equal importance for all features.

    The technical explanation delves into the mathematical formulations and computational aspects of these algorithms, providing details on the objective functions, optimization techniques, and performance tradeoffs involved.

    Critical Analysis

    The paper acknowledges that while significant progress has been made in categorical data clustering, there are still several open challenges and areas for further research. For example, the authors note that most existing methods assume the features are independent, when in reality there may be complex interdependencies that need to be accounted for.

    Another limitation discussed is the tendency of many algorithms to get stuck in local optima, leading to suboptimal clustering results. The authors suggest that incorporating prior knowledge or domain-specific constraints could help address this issue.

    Additionally, the review highlights the need for more robust evaluation metrics that can effectively assess the quality of clustering for categorical data, beyond just measures like cluster cohesion and separation.

    The paper also calls for more work on integrating categorical and numerical data in a unified clustering framework, as many real-world datasets contain a mix of feature types.

    Conclusion

    This comprehensive review of categorical data clustering provides a valuable synthesis of the significant advancements made in the field over the past 25 years. By examining the data sources, algorithms, and critical insights, the paper offers a thorough understanding of the current state of the art and the key challenges that remain.

    The technical and plain English explanations, paired with the critical analysis, equip readers with the necessary knowledge to appreciate the complexity of categorical data clustering and the ongoing efforts to develop more effective and robust solutions. This research promises to have important implications for a wide range of applications that rely on making sense of non-numerical data.



    This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

    Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

    Related Papers

    Categorical data clustering: 25 years beyond K-modes
    Total Score

    0

    Categorical data clustering: 25 years beyond K-modes

    Tai Dinh, Wong Hauchi, Philippe Fournier-Viger, Daniil Lisik, Minh-Quyet Ha, Hieu-Chi Dam, Van-Nam Huynh

    The clustering of categorical data is a common and important task in computer science, offering profound implications across a spectrum of applications. Unlike purely numerical data, categorical data often lack inherent ordering as in nominal data, or have varying levels of order as in ordinal data, thus requiring specialized methodologies for efficient organization and analysis. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of categorical data clustering in the past twenty-five years, starting from the introduction of K-modes. It elucidates the pivotal role of categorical data clustering in diverse fields such as health sciences, natural sciences, social sciences, education, engineering and economics. Practical comparisons are conducted for algorithms having public implementations, highlighting distinguishing clustering methodologies and revealing the performance of recent algorithms on several benchmark categorical datasets. Finally, challenges and opportunities in the field are discussed.

    Read more

    9/10/2024

    📊

    Total Score

    0

    Toward the Categorical Data Map

    Frederik L. Dennig, Lucas Joos, Patrick Paetzold, Daniela Blumberg, Oliver Deussen, Daniel A. Keim, Maximilian T. Fischer

    Categorical data does not have an intrinsic definition of distance or order, and therefore, established visualization techniques for categorical data only allow for a set-based or frequency-based analysis, e.g., through Euler diagrams or Parallel Sets, and do not support a similarity-based analysis. We present a novel dimensionality reduction-based visualization for categorical data, which is based on defining the distance of two data items as the number of varying attributes. Our technique enables users to pre-attentively detect groups of similar data items and observe the properties of the projection, such as attributes strongly influencing the embedding. Our prototype visually encodes data properties in an enhanced scatterplot-like visualization, encoding attributes in the background to show the distribution of categories. In addition, we propose two graph-based measures to quantify the plot's visual quality, which rank attributes according to their contribution to cluster cohesion. To demonstrate the capabilities of our similarity-based approach, we compare it to Euler diagrams and Parallel Sets regarding visual scalability and show its benefits through an expert study with five data scientists analyzing the Titanic and Mushroom datasets with up to 23 attributes and 8124 category combinations. Our results indicate that the Categorical Data Map offers an effective analysis method, especially for large datasets with a high number of category combinations.

    Read more

    8/27/2024

    📈

    Total Score

    0

    A new model for natural groupings in high-dimensional data

    Mireille Boutin, Evzenie Coupkova

    Clustering aims to divide a set of points into groups. The current paradigm assumes that the grouping is well-defined (unique) given the probability model from which the data is drawn. Yet, recent experiments have uncovered several high-dimensional datasets that form different binary groupings after projecting the data to randomly chosen one-dimensional subspaces. This paper describes a probability model for the data that could explain this phenomenon. It is a simple model to serve as a proof of concept for understanding the geometry of high-dimensional data. We start by building a rescaled multivariate Bernouilli model (stretched hypercube) so to create several overlapping grouping structures in the data. The size of each scaling parameter is related to the likelihood of uncovering the corresponding grouping by random 1D projection. Clusters in the original space are then created by adding noise to this cluster-free model. In high dimension, these clusters would hardly be observable given a sample set from the distribution because of the curse of dimensionality, but the binary groupings are clear. Our construction makes it clear that one needs to make a distinction between groupings and clusters in the original space. It also highlights the need to interpret any clustering found in projected data as merely one among potentially many other groupings in a dataset.

    Read more

    6/26/2024

    🤿

    Total Score

    0

    Evaluating Deep Clustering Algorithms on Non-Categorical 3D CAD Models

    Siyuan Xiang, Chin Tseng, Congcong Wen, Deshana Desai, Yifeng Kou, Binil Starly, Daniele Panozzo, Chen Feng

    We introduce the first work on benchmarking and evaluating deep clustering algorithms on large-scale non-categorical 3D CAD models. We first propose a workflow to allow expert mechanical engineers to efficiently annotate 252,648 carefully sampled pairwise CAD model similarities, from a subset of the ABC dataset with 22,968 shapes. Using seven baseline deep clustering methods, we then investigate the fundamental challenges of evaluating clustering methods for non-categorical data. Based on these challenges, we propose a novel and viable ensemble-based clustering comparison approach. This work is the first to directly target the underexplored area of deep clustering algorithms for 3D shapes, and we believe it will be an important building block to analyze and utilize the massive 3D shape collections that are starting to appear in deep geometric computing.

    Read more

    5/1/2024