Categorizing Sources of Information for Explanations in Conversational AI Systems for Older Adults Aging in Place
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the sources of information that should be provided in explanations for conversational AI systems aimed at older adults aging in place.
- The researchers propose a framework for categorizing different types of information that can be used to explain AI system decisions and behaviors to this user group.
- The goal is to create more transparent and trustworthy AI assistants that can effectively support older adults in their homes.
Plain English Explanation
Older adults often use conversational AI assistants, like virtual assistants or chatbots, to help with daily tasks as they age in their homes. However, these AI systems can be complex and difficult for older users to understand. This research explores how to make the explanations provided by these AI systems more clear and helpful for older adults.
The researchers developed a framework to categorize the different types of information that can be included in explanations from conversational AI systems. This includes things like:
- Explaining how the AI made a particular decision or recommendation
- Providing background information on the AI's capabilities and limitations
- Describing the data and knowledge sources the AI is drawing upon
- Clarifying any uncertainties or potential errors in the AI's outputs
By considering these different categories of information, the researchers aim to create AI explanations that are more transparent and trustworthy for older adults. The goal is to build AI assistants that can effectively support older adults aging in their homes.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a framework for categorizing the information that should be included in explanations provided by conversational AI systems for older adults. The key elements of the framework are:
- Decision Explanations - Describing the reasoning and data the AI used to arrive at a particular decision or recommendation.
- System Explanations - Providing background on the AI system's capabilities, limitations, and uncertainty.
- Knowledge Explanations - Clarifying the sources of information and data the AI is drawing upon.
- Error Explanations - Acknowledging potential errors or mistakes in the AI's outputs.
The researchers argue that incorporating these different types of explanatory information can make conversational AI systems more transparent and trustworthy for older adult users. They conducted a user study with older adults to evaluate the effectiveness of these explanation categories.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a strong case for the importance of providing comprehensive explanations in conversational AI systems for older adults. The proposed framework covers key aspects of transparency that could improve trust and usability for this user group.
However, the paper does not address some potential challenges, such as:
- Balancing the amount of explanatory information to avoid overwhelming older users
- Ensuring the explanations are tailored to the cognitive and literacy levels of diverse older adult users
- Incorporating the framework into real-world conversational AI systems and evaluating its long-term impact
Additionally, the user study in the paper had a relatively small sample size, so further research may be needed to validate the effectiveness of the explanation categories across a broader population of older adults.
Conclusion
This research proposes a valuable framework for designing more transparent and trustworthy conversational AI systems for older adults aging in place. By incorporating different types of explanatory information, such as decision rationales, system capabilities, and potential errors, the AI can become more understandable and helpful for this user group.
Implementing this framework has the potential to improve the user experience and foster greater trust in conversational AI assistants that support older adults' independence and quality of life. However, further research is needed to refine the approach and address potential challenges in real-world deployment.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Categorizing Sources of Information for Explanations in Conversational AI Systems for Older Adults Aging in Place
Niharika Mathur, Tamara Zubatiy, Elizabeth Mynatt
As the permeability of AI systems in interpersonal domains like the home expands, their technical capabilities of generating explanations are required to be aligned with user expectations for transparency and reasoning. This paper presents insights from our ongoing work in understanding the effectiveness of explanations in Conversational AI systems for older adults aging in place and their family caregivers. We argue that in collaborative and multi-user environments like the home, AI systems will make recommendations based on a host of information sources to generate explanations. These sources may be more or less salient based on user mental models of the system and the specific task. We highlight the need for cross technological collaboration between AI systems and other available sources of information in the home to generate multiple explanations for a single user query. Through example scenarios in a caregiving home setting, this paper provides an initial framework for categorizing these sources and informing a potential design space for AI explanations surrounding everyday tasks in the home.
Read more6/10/2024
0
Explainability for Transparent Conversational Information-Seeking
Weronika {L}ajewska, Damiano Spina, Johanne Trippas, Krisztian Balog
The increasing reliance on digital information necessitates advancements in conversational search systems, particularly in terms of information transparency. While prior research in conversational information-seeking has concentrated on improving retrieval techniques, the challenge remains in generating responses useful from a user perspective. This study explores different methods of explaining the responses, hypothesizing that transparency about the source of the information, system confidence, and limitations can enhance users' ability to objectively assess the response. By exploring transparency across explanation type, quality, and presentation mode, this research aims to bridge the gap between system-generated responses and responses verifiable by the user. We design a user study to answer questions concerning the impact of (1) the quality of explanations enhancing the response on its usefulness and (2) ways of presenting explanations to users. The analysis of the collected data reveals lower user ratings for noisy explanations, although these scores seem insensitive to the quality of the response. Inconclusive results on the explanations presentation format suggest that it may not be a critical factor in this setting.
Read more5/7/2024
🤖
0
Explaining AI Decisions: Towards Achieving Human-Centered Explainability in Smart Home Environments
Md Shajalal, Alexander Boden, Gunnar Stevens, Delong Du, Dean-Robin Kern
Smart home systems are gaining popularity as homeowners strive to enhance their living and working environments while minimizing energy consumption. However, the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled decision-making models in smart home systems faces challenges due to the complexity and black-box nature of these systems, leading to concerns about explainability, trust, transparency, accountability, and fairness. The emerging field of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) addresses these issues by providing explanations for the models' decisions and actions. While state-of-the-art XAI methods are beneficial for AI developers and practitioners, they may not be easily understood by general users, particularly household members. This paper advocates for human-centered XAI methods, emphasizing the importance of delivering readily comprehensible explanations to enhance user satisfaction and drive the adoption of smart home systems. We review state-of-the-art XAI methods and prior studies focusing on human-centered explanations for general users in the context of smart home applications. Through experiments on two smart home application scenarios, we demonstrate that explanations generated by prominent XAI techniques might not be effective in helping users understand and make decisions. We thus argue for the necessity of a human-centric approach in representing explanations in smart home systems and highlight relevant human-computer interaction (HCI) methodologies, including user studies, prototyping, technology probes analysis, and heuristic evaluation, that can be employed to generate and present human-centered explanations to users.
Read more4/26/2024
🗣️
0
Explaining Explaining
Sergei Nirenburg, Marjorie McShane, Kenneth W. Goodman, Sanjay Oruganti
Explanation is key to people having confidence in high-stakes AI systems. However, machine-learning-based systems -- which account for almost all current AI -- can't explain because they are usually black boxes. The explainable AI (XAI) movement hedges this problem by redefining explanation. The human-centered explainable AI (HCXAI) movement identifies the explanation-oriented needs of users but can't fulfill them because of its commitment to machine learning. In order to achieve the kinds of explanations needed by real people operating in critical domains, we must rethink how to approach AI. We describe a hybrid approach to developing cognitive agents that uses a knowledge-based infrastructure supplemented by data obtained through machine learning when applicable. These agents will serve as assistants to humans who will bear ultimate responsibility for the decisions and actions of the human-robot team. We illustrate the explanatory potential of such agents using the under-the-hood panels of a demonstration system in which a team of simulated robots collaborate on a search task assigned by a human.
Read more9/30/2024