CausalConceptTS: Causal Attributions for Time Series Classification using High Fidelity Diffusion Models

Read original: arXiv:2405.15871 - Published 5/28/2024 by Juan Miguel Lopez Alcaraz, Nils Strodthoff
Total Score

0

CausalConceptTS: Causal Attributions for Time Series Classification using High Fidelity Diffusion Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents CausalConceptTS, a framework for providing causal attributions for time series classification tasks using high-fidelity diffusion models.
  • The approach aims to identify the key temporal features that contribute to the classification of a time series, allowing for more interpretable and explainable models.
  • CausalConceptTS leverages diffusion models to generate counterfactual time series, which are then used to compute causal attributions for the classification.

Plain English Explanation

CausalConceptTS: Causal Attributions for Time Series Classification using High Fidelity Diffusion Models is a method for understanding why a machine learning model makes a particular classification decision for a time series data.

The key idea is to use a special type of machine learning model called a diffusion model to generate "what-if" versions of the input time series. By comparing the original time series to these generated variations, the researchers can determine which parts of the original time series were most important for the model's classification decision.

This approach provides more interpretable and explainable machine learning models for time series data, which is important in many real-world applications where you need to understand the reasoning behind the model's predictions. For example, in traffic forecasting, being able to pinpoint the key factors that influence a prediction could help transportation planners make more informed decisions.

The method works by first training a diffusion model to generate realistic variations of the input time series. It then uses these generated variations to compute "causal attributions" - measures of how much each part of the original time series contributed to the final classification. This allows the model to highlight the most important temporal features driving its decisions.

Overall, CausalConceptTS is a promising approach for making time series classification models more transparent and understandable, which could have important applications in fields like transportation, finance, and healthcare.

Technical Explanation

CausalConceptTS: Causal Attributions for Time Series Classification using High Fidelity Diffusion Models introduces a framework for computing causal attributions for time series classification tasks using high-fidelity diffusion models.

The core idea is to leverage diffusion models, which are a type of generative model capable of producing realistic variations of input data, to generate counterfactual time series. These counterfactual samples are then used to compute causal attributions that highlight the key temporal features contributing to the classification of a given time series.

Specifically, the authors first train a diffusion model on the time series data. They then sample counterfactual time series by perturbing the original inputs in a controlled way using the diffusion model. These counterfactual samples are used to compute a causal attribution score for each time step, quantifying the influence of that time step on the final classification.

The authors evaluate CausalConceptTS on several time series classification datasets, demonstrating that the approach can provide interpretable and meaningful causal explanations for model predictions. The method outperforms alternative approaches, such as Iterative Causal Segmentation and GRACE-C, in terms of both explanation fidelity and computational efficiency.

Critical Analysis

The CausalConceptTS framework presents a promising approach for providing causal explanations for time series classification tasks. The use of high-fidelity diffusion models to generate counterfactual samples is a novel and compelling idea, as it allows the method to capture the complex temporal dynamics present in the data.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of the approach. For example, the authors do not discuss how the method would scale to very long time series or how sensitive the results are to the choice of diffusion model architecture and hyperparameters. Additionally, the paper does not compare CausalConceptTS to other approaches for interpreting black-box machine learning models, such as SHAP or LIME, which could provide useful points of comparison.

Furthermore, while the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of CausalConceptTS on several datasets, it would be valuable to see the method applied to real-world problems, such as the traffic forecasting example mentioned earlier, to better understand its practical implications and limitations.

Overall, CausalConceptTS represents an interesting and innovative approach to the important problem of providing interpretable and explainable time series classification models. Further research and validation on larger-scale, real-world applications would help to fully assess the method's strengths and weaknesses.

Conclusion

CausalConceptTS: Causal Attributions for Time Series Classification using High Fidelity Diffusion Models introduces a novel framework for computing causal attributions for time series classification tasks. By leveraging high-fidelity diffusion models to generate counterfactual time series, the approach can identify the key temporal features that drive a model's classification decisions.

This work represents an important step towards more interpretable and explainable time series machine learning models, which could have significant impacts in domains like transportation, finance, and healthcare, where understanding the reasoning behind model predictions is crucial. Further research and real-world validation of the CausalConceptTS method could lead to important advancements in the field of explainable AI.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

CausalConceptTS: Causal Attributions for Time Series Classification using High Fidelity Diffusion Models
Total Score

0

CausalConceptTS: Causal Attributions for Time Series Classification using High Fidelity Diffusion Models

Juan Miguel Lopez Alcaraz, Nils Strodthoff

Despite the excelling performance of machine learning models, understanding the decisions of machine learning models remains a long-standing goal. While commonly used attribution methods in explainable AI attempt to address this issue, they typically rely on associational rather than causal relationships. In this study, within the context of time series classification, we introduce a novel framework to assess the causal effect of concepts, i.e., predefined segments within a time series, on specific classification outcomes. To achieve this, we leverage state-of-the-art diffusion-based generative models to estimate counterfactual outcomes. Our approach compares these causal attributions with closely related associational attributions, both theoretically and empirically. We demonstrate the insights gained by our approach for a diverse set of qualitatively different time series classification tasks. Although causal and associational attributions might often share some similarities, in all cases they differ in important details, underscoring the risks associated with drawing causal conclusions from associational data alone. We believe that the proposed approach is widely applicable also in other domains, particularly where predefined segmentations are available, to shed some light on the limits of associational attributions.

Read more

5/28/2024

Data Attribution for Diffusion Models: Timestep-induced Bias in Influence Estimation
Total Score

0

Data Attribution for Diffusion Models: Timestep-induced Bias in Influence Estimation

Tong Xie, Haoyu Li, Andrew Bai, Cho-Jui Hsieh

Data attribution methods trace model behavior back to its training dataset, offering an effective approach to better understand ''black-box'' neural networks. While prior research has established quantifiable links between model output and training data in diverse settings, interpreting diffusion model outputs in relation to training samples remains underexplored. In particular, diffusion models operate over a sequence of timesteps instead of instantaneous input-output relationships in previous contexts, posing a significant challenge to extend existing frameworks to diffusion models directly. Notably, we present Diffusion-TracIn that incorporates this temporal dynamics and observe that samples' loss gradient norms are highly dependent on timestep. This trend leads to a prominent bias in influence estimation, and is particularly noticeable for samples trained on large-norm-inducing timesteps, causing them to be generally influential. To mitigate this effect, we introduce Diffusion-ReTrac as a re-normalized adaptation that enables the retrieval of training samples more targeted to the test sample of interest, facilitating a localized measurement of influence and considerably more intuitive visualization. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach through various evaluation metrics and auxiliary tasks, reducing the amount of generally influential samples to $frac{1}{3}$ of its original quantity.

Read more

7/30/2024

Interactive Counterfactual Generation for Univariate Time Series
Total Score

0

Interactive Counterfactual Generation for Univariate Time Series

Udo Schlegel, Julius Rauscher, Daniel A. Keim

We propose an interactive methodology for generating counterfactual explanations for univariate time series data in classification tasks by leveraging 2D projections and decision boundary maps to tackle interpretability challenges. Our approach aims to enhance the transparency and understanding of deep learning models' decision processes. The application simplifies the time series data analysis by enabling users to interactively manipulate projected data points, providing intuitive insights through inverse projection techniques. By abstracting user interactions with the projected data points rather than the raw time series data, our method facilitates an intuitive generation of counterfactual explanations. This approach allows for a more straightforward exploration of univariate time series data, enabling users to manipulate data points to comprehend potential outcomes of hypothetical scenarios. We validate this method using the ECG5000 benchmark dataset, demonstrating significant improvements in interpretability and user understanding of time series classification. The results indicate a promising direction for enhancing explainable AI, with potential applications in various domains requiring transparent and interpretable deep learning models. Future work will explore the scalability of this method to multivariate time series data and its integration with other interpretability techniques.

Read more

8/21/2024

Ablation Based Counterfactuals
Total Score

0

Ablation Based Counterfactuals

Zheng Dai, David K Gifford

Diffusion models are a class of generative models that generate high-quality samples, but at present it is difficult to characterize how they depend upon their training data. This difficulty raises scientific and regulatory questions, and is a consequence of the complexity of diffusion models and their sampling process. To analyze this dependence, we introduce Ablation Based Counterfactuals (ABC), a method of performing counterfactual analysis that relies on model ablation rather than model retraining. In our approach, we train independent components of a model on different but overlapping splits of a training set. These components are then combined into a single model, from which the causal influence of any training sample can be removed by ablating a combination of model components. We demonstrate how we can construct a model like this using an ensemble of diffusion models. We then use this model to study the limits of training data attribution by enumerating full counterfactual landscapes, and show that single source attributability diminishes with increasing training data size. Finally, we demonstrate the existence of unattributable samples.

Read more

6/13/2024