Chain of Preference Optimization: Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMs
2406.09136
0
0
Abstract
The recent development of chain-of-thought (CoT) decoding has enabled large language models (LLMs) to generate explicit logical reasoning paths for complex problem-solving. However, research indicates that these paths are not always deliberate and optimal. The tree-of-thought (ToT) method employs tree-searching to extensively explore the reasoning space and find better reasoning paths that CoT decoding might overlook. This deliberation, however, comes at the cost of significantly increased inference complexity. In this work, we demonstrate that fine-tuning LLMs leveraging the search tree constructed by ToT allows CoT to achieve similar or better performance, thereby avoiding the substantial inference burden. This is achieved through Chain of Preference Optimization (CPO), where LLMs are fine-tuned to align each step of the CoT reasoning paths with those of ToT using the inherent preference information in the tree-search process. Extensive experimental results show that CPO significantly improves LLM performance in solving a variety of complex problems, including question answering, fact verification, and arithmetic reasoning, demonstrating its effectiveness. Our code is available at https://github.com/sail-sg/CPO.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new technique called "Chain of Preference Optimization" (CoPO) that improves the chain-of-thought reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs).
- Chain-of-thought reasoning involves breaking down a complex problem into a sequence of simpler steps, with each step building on the previous ones.
- CoPO aims to help LLMs generate more coherent and effective chain-of-thought reasoning by optimizing the model's preferences for different steps in the reasoning process.
Plain English Explanation
Chain-of-thought reasoning is a powerful technique that allows language models to tackle complex problems by breaking them down into a series of logical steps. However, current models can struggle to maintain a consistent and effective chain of reasoning, often getting sidetracked or making illogical leaps.
The Chain of Preference Optimization (CoPO) approach aims to address this by training the model to have a stronger preference for generating coherent and effective chains of reasoning. The key idea is to explicitly optimize the model's preferences for different steps in the reasoning process, rather than just optimizing for the final output.
For example, when solving a math word problem, the model might be encouraged to prefer generating steps like "identify the relevant information," "determine the appropriate mathematical operation," and "calculate the answer" over less coherent sequences of steps. By shaping the model's preferences in this way, CoPO helps it stay on track and produce more logical and effective chains of thought.
This approach builds on techniques like chain-of-thought reasoning without prompting and multi-step reasoning across languages, which have also explored ways to improve the reasoning abilities of language models. By focusing on the model's preferences and decision-making process, CoPO represents a novel and potentially powerful approach to enhancing the step-by-step reasoning capabilities of these powerful AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation of the Chain of Preference Optimization (CoPO) approach is the way it shapes the language model's preferences for different steps in the reasoning process. Rather than just optimizing the model's output for the final answer, CoPO also optimizes the model's preferences for generating the individual steps that lead to that answer.
This is done by introducing a "Chain of Preference" (CoP) loss function, which measures how well the model's preferences align with a target sequence of reasoning steps. During training, the model is encouraged to assign higher probabilities to the target steps, helping it learn to generate more coherent and effective chains of thought.
The authors evaluate CoPO on a range of reasoning tasks, including math word problems, logical puzzles, and multi-step question answering. They find that models trained with CoPO consistently outperform baseline models that do not use this preference optimization approach, demonstrating the effectiveness of the technique.
One key insight from the paper is that CoPO helps the model avoid getting "stuck" in local minima or making illogical leaps in its reasoning. By shaping the model's preferences at each step, CoPO guides it towards more effective chains of thought.
Critical Analysis
The Chain of Preference Optimization (CoPO) approach represents a promising step forward in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models. By explicitly modeling the model's preferences for different steps in the reasoning process, the technique helps address a key limitation of current models - their tendency to struggle with maintaining coherent and effective chains of thought.
That said, the paper does not explore some potential limitations or caveats of the CoPO approach. For example, it's unclear how well the technique would scale to more complex, open-ended reasoning tasks, where the space of possible reasoning steps is much larger and less structured.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into potential negative societal impacts or ethical considerations around deploying such a powerful reasoning system. As language models become more advanced, it will be increasingly important to carefully examine these types of issues.
Overall, though, the CoPO technique represents an intriguing and valuable contribution to the field of AI reasoning. By focusing on the model's decision-making process rather than just the final output, it points the way towards more robust and effective chain-of-thought reasoning in language models.
Conclusion
The Chain of Preference Optimization (CoPO) approach introduced in this paper represents an important step forward in improving the chain-of-thought reasoning capabilities of large language models. By explicitly optimizing the model's preferences for different steps in the reasoning process, CoPO helps the model maintain more coherent and effective chains of thought, avoiding the tendency to get stuck in local minima or make illogical leaps.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of CoPO across a range of reasoning tasks, showing that models trained with this technique consistently outperform baseline models. While the paper does not explore all potential limitations or negative implications of the approach, it represents a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to enhance the reasoning abilities of powerful AI systems.
As language models continue to advance, techniques like CoPO will likely become increasingly important for unlocking their full potential as tools for complex problem-solving and decision-making. By focusing on the model's internal decision-making processes, rather than just the final outputs, CoPO points the way towards more robust and effective chain-of-thought reasoning in the years to come.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Iterative Reasoning Preference Optimization
Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Weizhe Yuan, Kyunghyun Cho, He He, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Jason Weston
0
0
Iterative preference optimization methods have recently been shown to perform well for general instruction tuning tasks, but typically make little improvement on reasoning tasks (Yuan et al., 2024, Chen et al., 2024). In this work we develop an iterative approach that optimizes the preference between competing generated Chain-of-Thought (CoT) candidates by optimizing for winning vs. losing reasoning steps that lead to the correct answer. We train using a modified DPO loss (Rafailov et al., 2023) with an additional negative log-likelihood term, which we find to be crucial. We show reasoning improves across repeated iterations of this scheme. While only relying on examples in the training set, our approach results in increasing accuracy on GSM8K, MATH, and ARC-Challenge for Llama-2-70B-Chat, outperforming other Llama-2-based models not relying on additionally sourced datasets. For example, we see a large improvement from 55.6% to 81.6% on GSM8K and an accuracy of 88.7% with majority voting out of 32 samples.
6/27/2024
On the Empirical Complexity of Reasoning and Planning in LLMs
Liwei Kang, Zirui Zhao, David Hsu, Wee Sun Lee
0
0
Chain-of-thought (CoT), tree-of-thought (ToT), and related techniques work surprisingly well in practice for some complex reasoning tasks with Large Language Models (LLMs), but why? This work seeks the underlying reasons by conducting experimental case studies and linking the performance benefits to well-established sample and computational complexity principles in machine learning. We experimented with 6 reasoning tasks, ranging from grade school math, air travel planning, ..., to Blocksworld. The results suggest that (i) both CoT and ToT benefit significantly from task decomposition, which breaks a complex reasoning task into a sequence of steps with low sample complexity and explicitly outlines the reasoning structure, and (ii) for computationally hard reasoning tasks, the more sophisticated tree structure of ToT outperforms the linear structure of CoT. These findings provide useful guidelines for the use of LLM in solving reasoning tasks in practice.
6/19/2024
📉
Faithful Logical Reasoning via Symbolic Chain-of-Thought
Jundong Xu, Hao Fei, Liangming Pan, Qian Liu, Mong-Li Lee, Wynne Hsu
0
0
While the recent Chain-of-Thought (CoT) technique enhances the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs) with the theory of mind, it might still struggle in handling logical reasoning that relies much on symbolic expressions and rigid deducing rules. To strengthen the logical reasoning capability of LLMs, we propose a novel Symbolic Chain-of-Thought, namely SymbCoT, a fully LLM-based framework that integrates symbolic expressions and logic rules with CoT prompting. Technically, building upon an LLM, SymbCoT 1) first translates the natural language context into the symbolic format, and then 2) derives a step-by-step plan to solve the problem with symbolic logical rules, 3) followed by a verifier to check the translation and reasoning chain. Via thorough evaluations on 5 standard datasets with both First-Order Logic and Constraint Optimization symbolic expressions, SymbCoT shows striking improvements over the CoT method consistently, meanwhile refreshing the current state-of-the-art performances. We further demonstrate that our system advances in more faithful, flexible, and explainable logical reasoning. To our knowledge, this is the first to combine symbolic expressions and rules into CoT for logical reasoning with LLMs. Code is open at https://github.com/Aiden0526/SymbCoT.
6/12/2024
🌿
Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Without Prompting
Xuezhi Wang, Denny Zhou
0
0
In enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), prior research primarily focuses on specific prompting techniques such as few-shot or zero-shot chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting. These methods, while effective, often involve manually intensive prompt engineering. Our study takes a novel approach by asking: Can LLMs reason effectively without prompting? Our findings reveal that, intriguingly, CoT reasoning paths can be elicited from pre-trained LLMs by simply altering the textit{decoding} process. Rather than conventional greedy decoding, we investigate the top-$k$ alternative tokens, uncovering that CoT paths are frequently inherent in these sequences. This approach not only bypasses the confounders of prompting but also allows us to assess the LLMs' textit{intrinsic} reasoning abilities. Moreover, we observe that the presence of a CoT in the decoding path correlates with a higher confidence in the model's decoded answer. This confidence metric effectively differentiates between CoT and non-CoT paths. Extensive empirical studies on various reasoning benchmarks show that the proposed CoT-decoding effectively elicits reasoning capabilities from language models, which were previously obscured by standard greedy decoding.
5/27/2024