Faithful Logical Reasoning via Symbolic Chain-of-Thought
2405.18357
2
0
📉
Abstract
While the recent Chain-of-Thought (CoT) technique enhances the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs) with the theory of mind, it might still struggle in handling logical reasoning that relies much on symbolic expressions and rigid deducing rules. To strengthen the logical reasoning capability of LLMs, we propose a novel Symbolic Chain-of-Thought, namely SymbCoT, a fully LLM-based framework that integrates symbolic expressions and logic rules with CoT prompting. Technically, building upon an LLM, SymbCoT 1) first translates the natural language context into the symbolic format, and then 2) derives a step-by-step plan to solve the problem with symbolic logical rules, 3) followed by a verifier to check the translation and reasoning chain. Via thorough evaluations on 5 standard datasets with both First-Order Logic and Constraint Optimization symbolic expressions, SymbCoT shows striking improvements over the CoT method consistently, meanwhile refreshing the current state-of-the-art performances. We further demonstrate that our system advances in more faithful, flexible, and explainable logical reasoning. To our knowledge, this is the first to combine symbolic expressions and rules into CoT for logical reasoning with LLMs. Code is open at https://github.com/Aiden0526/SymbCoT.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new technique called Symbolic Chain-of-Thought (SymbCoT) to enhance the logical reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs).
- SymbCoT integrates symbolic expressions and logical rules with the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting method.
- The authors claim SymbCoT shows significant improvements over the standard CoT method across several benchmark datasets.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers wanted to find a way to improve the logical reasoning abilities of powerful language models like GPT-3. While the Chain-of-Thought technique has helped, it still struggles with reasoning that relies heavily on symbolic expressions and rigid deduction rules.
To address this, the team developed a new approach called Symbolic Chain-of-Thought (SymbCoT). SymbCoT takes the natural language input, translates it into a symbolic format, and then uses logical rules to step-by-step solve the problem. Finally, it verifies the reasoning chain.
By combining symbolic logic with the Chain-of-Thought framework, the researchers were able to significantly outperform the standard CoT method on a variety of benchmark tests. Their system showed more faithful, flexible, and explainable logical reasoning.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation of SymbCoT is its integration of symbolic expressions and logical rules into the Chain-of-Thought prompting technique. Specifically:
- The system first translates the natural language input into a symbolic format that can be processed by logical rules.
- It then derives a step-by-step plan to solve the problem using these symbolic logical rules.
- Finally, a verifier checks the translation and reasoning chain to ensure correctness.
The authors evaluated SymbCoT on 5 standard datasets, including both First-Order Logic and Constraint Optimization problems. Across the board, SymbCoT outperformed the standard CoT method and set new state-of-the-art performance.
The researchers attribute this success to SymbCoT's ability to leverage the powerful reasoning capabilities of LLMs while grounding them in symbolic logic. This allows for more faithful, flexible, and explainable logical reasoning.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough evaluation of SymbCoT and demonstrates its effectiveness. However, some potential limitations and areas for future research are worth considering:
- The authors focus on benchmark datasets, so more real-world testing may be needed to assess SymbCoT's practical applications.
- The translation from natural language to symbolic format could be a potential source of errors or inefficiencies.
- While the reasoning chain is made more explainable, the inner workings of the LLM component are still opaque.
Additionally, it would be interesting to see how SymbCoT compares to other hybrid approaches that combine symbolic and neural techniques. Exploring the trade-offs and synergies between these different methods could lead to further advancements in logical reasoning systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents an innovative approach called Symbolic Chain-of-Thought (SymbCoT) that enhances the logical reasoning capabilities of large language models. By integrating symbolic expressions and logical rules with the Chain-of-Thought prompting technique, the researchers were able to achieve significant improvements over the standard CoT method on a variety of benchmark tests.
The key strength of SymbCoT is its ability to leverage the powerful reasoning skills of LLMs while grounding them in a more explicit, step-by-step symbolic logic framework. This results in logical reasoning that is more faithful, flexible, and explainable.
While there are still some limitations and areas for further research, the success of SymbCoT highlights the potential of hybrid approaches that combine symbolic and neural techniques. As language models continue to advance, innovations like this will be crucial for expanding their reasoning abilities and making them more reliable and trustworthy for real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤔
How to think step-by-step: A mechanistic understanding of chain-of-thought reasoning
Subhabrata Dutta, Joykirat Singh, Soumen Chakrabarti, Tanmoy Chakraborty
0
0
Despite superior reasoning prowess demonstrated by Large Language Models (LLMs) with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, a lack of understanding prevails around the internal mechanisms of the models that facilitate CoT generation. This work investigates the neural sub-structures within LLMs that manifest CoT reasoning from a mechanistic point of view. From an analysis of Llama-2 7B applied to multistep reasoning over fictional ontologies, we demonstrate that LLMs deploy multiple parallel pathways of answer generation for step-by-step reasoning. These parallel pathways provide sequential answers from the input question context as well as the generated CoT. We observe a functional rift in the middle layers of the LLM. Token representations in the initial half remain strongly biased towards the pretraining prior, with the in-context prior taking over in the later half. This internal phase shift manifests in different functional components: attention heads that write the answer token appear in the later half, attention heads that move information along ontological relationships appear in the initial half, and so on. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt towards mechanistic investigation of CoT reasoning in LLMs.
5/7/2024
💬
Synergy-of-Thoughts: Eliciting Efficient Reasoning in Hybrid Language Models
Yu Shang, Yu Li, Fengli Xu, Yong Li
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive emergent abilities in a wide range of tasks, but still face challenges in handling complex reasoning problems. Previous works like chain-of-thought (CoT) and tree-of-thoughts (ToT) have predominately focused on enhancing accuracy, but overlook the rapidly increasing token cost, which could be particularly problematic for open-ended real-world tasks with huge solution spaces. Motivated by the dual process theory of human cognition, we propose Synergy of Thoughts (SoT) to unleash the synergistic potential of hybrid LLMs for efficient reasoning. By default, SoT uses smaller-scale language models to generate multiple low-cost reasoning thoughts, which resembles the parallel intuitions produced by System 1. If these intuitions exhibit conflicts, SoT will invoke the reflective reasoning of scaled-up language models to emulate the intervention of System 2, which will override the intuitive thoughts and rectify the reasoning process. This framework is model-agnostic and training-free, which can be flexibly implemented with various off-the-shelf LLMs. Experiments on six representative reasoning tasks show that SoT substantially reduces the token cost by 38.3%-75.1%, and simultaneously achieves state-of-the-art reasoning accuracy and solution diversity. Notably, the average token cost reduction on open-ended tasks reaches up to 69.1%. Code repo with all prompts will be released upon publication.
5/24/2024
💬
Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Models
Zhuosheng Zhang, Aston Zhang, Mu Li, Hai Zhao, George Karypis, Alex Smola
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on complex reasoning by leveraging chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting to generate intermediate reasoning chains as the rationale to infer the answer. However, existing CoT studies have primarily focused on the language modality. We propose Multimodal-CoT that incorporates language (text) and vision (images) modalities into a two-stage framework that separates rationale generation and answer inference. In this way, answer inference can leverage better generated rationales that are based on multimodal information. Experimental results on ScienceQA and A-OKVQA benchmark datasets show the effectiveness of our proposed approach. With Multimodal-CoT, our model under 1 billion parameters achieves state-of-the-art performance on the ScienceQA benchmark. Our analysis indicates that Multimodal-CoT offers the advantages of mitigating hallucination and enhancing convergence speed. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/amazon-science/mm-cot.
5/21/2024
Chain of Preference Optimization: Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMs
Xuan Zhang, Chao Du, Tianyu Pang, Qian Liu, Wei Gao, Min Lin
0
0
The recent development of chain-of-thought (CoT) decoding has enabled large language models (LLMs) to generate explicit logical reasoning paths for complex problem-solving. However, research indicates that these paths are not always deliberate and optimal. The tree-of-thought (ToT) method employs tree-searching to extensively explore the reasoning space and find better reasoning paths that CoT decoding might overlook. This deliberation, however, comes at the cost of significantly increased inference complexity. In this work, we demonstrate that fine-tuning LLMs leveraging the search tree constructed by ToT allows CoT to achieve similar or better performance, thereby avoiding the substantial inference burden. This is achieved through Chain of Preference Optimization (CPO), where LLMs are fine-tuned to align each step of the CoT reasoning paths with those of ToT using the inherent preference information in the tree-search process. Extensive experimental results show that CPO significantly improves LLM performance in solving a variety of complex problems, including question answering, fact verification, and arithmetic reasoning, demonstrating its effectiveness. Our code is available at https://github.com/sail-sg/CPO.
6/14/2024