How to think step-by-step: A mechanistic understanding of chain-of-thought reasoning
2402.18312
0
0
š¤
Abstract
Despite superior reasoning prowess demonstrated by Large Language Models (LLMs) with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, a lack of understanding prevails around the internal mechanisms of the models that facilitate CoT generation. This work investigates the neural sub-structures within LLMs that manifest CoT reasoning from a mechanistic point of view. From an analysis of Llama-2 7B applied to multistep reasoning over fictional ontologies, we demonstrate that LLMs deploy multiple parallel pathways of answer generation for step-by-step reasoning. These parallel pathways provide sequential answers from the input question context as well as the generated CoT. We observe a functional rift in the middle layers of the LLM. Token representations in the initial half remain strongly biased towards the pretraining prior, with the in-context prior taking over in the later half. This internal phase shift manifests in different functional components: attention heads that write the answer token appear in the later half, attention heads that move information along ontological relationships appear in the initial half, and so on. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt towards mechanistic investigation of CoT reasoning in LLMs.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Investigates the internal mechanisms of large language models (LLMs) that enable Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning
- Analyzes the neural sub-structures within the Llama-2 7B model during multistep reasoning over fictional ontologies
- Demonstrates that LLMs deploy multiple parallel pathways for step-by-step reasoning, with different functional components emerging across the model's layers
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, which involves breaking down complex problems into a series of logical steps. However, the internal mechanisms that enable this type of reasoning are not well understood.
This research investigates the inner workings of LLMs, specifically the Llama-2 7B model, to shed light on how they generate step-by-step reasoning. The researchers found that LLMs use multiple parallel pathways to provide answers, drawing from both the initial question context and the generated CoT.
They also observed a "phase shift" in the model's middle layers, where the initial half of the model remains strongly influenced by its pre-training, while the later half is more driven by the current context. This manifests in different functional components, such as attention heads that write the final answer or attention heads that move information along ontological relationships.
Overall, this research provides a more detailed understanding of the internal mechanisms that power the impressive Chain-of-Thought reasoning capabilities of large language models.
Technical Explanation
The researchers analyzed the Llama-2 7B LLM's behavior during multistep reasoning tasks over fictional ontologies. They found that the model deploys multiple parallel pathways to generate step-by-step answers, drawing from both the initial question context and the generated Chain-of-Thought (CoT).
Notably, the researchers observed a "phase shift" in the model's middle layers, where the initial half remained strongly biased towards the pre-training prior, while the later half was more influenced by the current context. This internal shift manifested in different functional components, such as:
- Attention heads that write the final answer appearing in the later half of the model
- Attention heads that move information along ontological relationships appearing in the initial half
These findings provide a more detailed understanding of the neural sub-structures responsible for Chain-of-Thought reasoning in LLMs, which has not been thoroughly investigated before.
Critical Analysis
The research provides valuable insights into the inner workings of LLMs during Chain-of-Thought reasoning, but there are some limitations and open questions that could be explored further:
- The study focuses on a single LLM, the Llama-2 7B, and it's unclear how the findings would generalize to other models or architectures.
- The experiments were conducted on fictional ontologies, which may not fully capture the complexity of real-world reasoning tasks.
- The researchers did not investigate the impact of different prompting strategies or the role of other architectural components, such as the attention mechanism, on Chain-of-Thought generation.
Further research could explore these areas to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying Chain-of-Thought reasoning in LLMs.
Conclusion
This research sheds light on the internal mechanisms that enable Chain-of-Thought reasoning in large language models. The key findings include the discovery of multiple parallel pathways for step-by-step answer generation and a functional rift in the middle layers of the model, with different components responsible for various aspects of the reasoning process.
These insights contribute to a better understanding of the neural sub-structures that power the impressive Chain-of-Thought capabilities of LLMs, which could have important implications for the design and development of more advanced reasoning systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Iteration Head: A Mechanistic Study of Chain-of-Thought
Vivien Cabannes, Charles Arnal, Wassim Bouaziz, Alice Yang, Francois Charton, Julia Kempe
0
0
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning is known to improve Large Language Models both empirically and in terms of theoretical approximation power. However, our understanding of the inner workings and conditions of apparition of CoT capabilities remains limited. This paper helps fill this gap by demonstrating how CoT reasoning emerges in transformers in a controlled and interpretable setting. In particular, we observe the appearance of a specialized attention mechanism dedicated to iterative reasoning, which we coined iteration heads. We track both the emergence and the precise working of these iteration heads down to the attention level, and measure the transferability of the CoT skills to which they give rise between tasks.
6/5/2024
š§
On the Representational Capacity of Neural Language Models with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Franz Nowak, Anej Svete, Alexandra Butoi, Ryan Cotterell
0
0
The performance of modern language models (LMs) has been improved by chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, i.e., the process of generating intermediate results that guide the model towards a final answer. A possible explanation for this improvement is that CoT reasoning extends an LM's computational power, as RNNs and transformers with additional scratch space are known to be Turing complete. Comparing LMs to Turing machines, however, introduces a category error - Turing machines decide language membership, whereas LMs define distributions over strings. To bridge this gap, we formalize CoT reasoning in a probabilistic setting. We present several results on the representational capacity of recurrent and transformer LMs with CoT reasoning, showing that they can represent the same family of distributions over strings as probabilistic Turing machines.
6/21/2024
š¬
Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Models
Zhuosheng Zhang, Aston Zhang, Mu Li, Hai Zhao, George Karypis, Alex Smola
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on complex reasoning by leveraging chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting to generate intermediate reasoning chains as the rationale to infer the answer. However, existing CoT studies have primarily focused on the language modality. We propose Multimodal-CoT that incorporates language (text) and vision (images) modalities into a two-stage framework that separates rationale generation and answer inference. In this way, answer inference can leverage better generated rationales that are based on multimodal information. Experimental results on ScienceQA and A-OKVQA benchmark datasets show the effectiveness of our proposed approach. With Multimodal-CoT, our model under 1 billion parameters achieves state-of-the-art performance on the ScienceQA benchmark. Our analysis indicates that Multimodal-CoT offers the advantages of mitigating hallucination and enhancing convergence speed. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/amazon-science/mm-cot.
5/21/2024
Direct Evaluation of Chain-of-Thought in Multi-hop Reasoning with Knowledge Graphs
Minh-Vuong Nguyen, Linhao Luo, Fatemeh Shiri, Dinh Phung, Yuan-Fang Li, Thuy-Trang Vu, Gholamreza Haffari
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning abilities when prompted to generate chain-of-thought (CoT) explanations alongside answers. However, previous research on evaluating LLMs has solely focused on answer accuracy, neglecting the correctness of the generated CoT. In this paper, we delve deeper into the CoT reasoning capabilities of LLMs in multi-hop question answering by utilizing knowledge graphs (KGs). We propose a novel discriminative and generative CoT evaluation paradigm to assess LLMs' knowledge of reasoning and the accuracy of the generated CoT. Through experiments conducted on 5 different families of LLMs across 2 multi-hop question-answering datasets, we find that LLMs possess sufficient knowledge to perform reasoning. However, there exists a significant disparity between answer accuracy and faithfulness of the CoT reasoning generated by LLMs, indicating that they often arrive at correct answers through incorrect reasoning.
6/21/2024