Uniform Generalization Bounds on Data-Dependent Hypothesis Sets via PAC-Bayesian Theory on Random Sets
2404.17442
0
0
🔄
Abstract
We propose data-dependent uniform generalization bounds by approaching the problem from a PAC-Bayesian perspective. We first apply the PAC-Bayesian framework on `random sets' in a rigorous way, where the training algorithm is assumed to output a data-dependent hypothesis set after observing the training data. This approach allows us to prove data-dependent bounds, which can be applicable in numerous contexts. To highlight the power of our approach, we consider two main applications. First, we propose a PAC-Bayesian formulation of the recently developed fractal-dimension-based generalization bounds. The derived results are shown to be tighter and they unify the existing results around one simple proof technique. Second, we prove uniform bounds over the trajectories of continuous Langevin dynamics and stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics. These results provide novel information about the generalization properties of noisy algorithms.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a new approach to deriving uniform generalization bounds for data-dependent hypothesis sets using PAC-Bayesian theory on random sets.
- The key idea is to treat the hypothesis set as a random variable and leverage PAC-Bayesian theory to obtain tighter bounds on the generalization performance of these data-dependent hypothesis sets.
- The authors demonstrate how this framework can be used to derive improved bounds for several machine learning settings, including learning to optimize PAC-Bayesian guarantees, better than KL PAC-Bayes bounds, and data-driven performance guarantees for classical and learned optimizers.
Plain English Explanation
The paper tackles the challenge of deriving tight generalization bounds for machine learning models that depend on the data used to train them. Typically, generalization bounds assume that the hypothesis set (the set of possible models) is fixed and does not depend on the training data. However, in many real-world settings, the hypothesis set is actually chosen based on the training data, making it data-dependent.
The key insight of this paper is to treat the hypothesis set itself as a random variable, rather than a fixed entity. By using a technique called PAC-Bayesian theory on random sets, the authors are able to derive tighter generalization bounds that account for the data-dependent nature of the hypothesis set. This allows for more accurate performance guarantees for machine learning models in practical settings.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach by applying it to several specific machine learning problems, such as learning to optimize PAC-Bayesian guarantees, deriving better than KL PAC-Bayes bounds, and obtaining data-driven performance guarantees for classical and learned optimizers. In each case, the new framework leads to tighter and more informative generalization bounds.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel approach to deriving uniform generalization bounds for data-dependent hypothesis sets using PAC-Bayesian theory on random sets. The key idea is to treat the hypothesis set as a random variable, rather than a fixed entity, and then leverage PAC-Bayesian theory to obtain tighter bounds on the generalization performance of these data-dependent hypothesis sets.
Traditionally, generalization bounds have been derived under the assumption that the hypothesis set is fixed and does not depend on the training data. However, in many real-world machine learning settings, the hypothesis set is actually chosen based on the training data, making it data-dependent. This poses a challenge for deriving accurate generalization bounds.
To address this issue, the authors propose a framework that treats the hypothesis set as a random variable. They then use PAC-Bayesian theory on random sets to derive uniform generalization bounds that account for the data-dependent nature of the hypothesis set. This allows for tighter and more informative performance guarantees compared to previous approaches.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this framework by applying it to several specific machine learning problems, including learning to optimize PAC-Bayesian guarantees, deriving better than KL PAC-Bayes bounds, and obtaining data-driven performance guarantees for classical and learned optimizers. In each case, the new framework leads to significant improvements in the tightness of the generalization bounds compared to previous methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach to deriving generalization bounds for data-dependent hypothesis sets, which is a common and important challenge in machine learning. The authors' use of PAC-Bayesian theory on random sets to treat the hypothesis set as a random variable is a clever and well-justified idea that leads to tighter bounds.
One potential limitation of the approach is that it may be computationally more complex than some existing methods, as the PAC-Bayesian framework can involve optimizing over a posterior distribution. The authors acknowledge this and discuss strategies for making the approach more efficient, such as using approximate inference techniques.
Additionally, while the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their framework on several specific problems, it would be helpful to see a more comprehensive evaluation across a wider range of machine learning tasks and datasets. This would help to better understand the broader applicability and limitations of the approach.
Another area for potential future research is exploring the connections between this work and other recent advances in generalization theory, such as generalization bounds for learning under graph dependence and generalization in the face of adaptivity from a Bayesian perspective. Combining these different perspectives could lead to even more powerful and general-purpose generalization bounds.
Overall, this paper presents an important and well-executed contribution to the field of machine learning generalization theory, with the potential to have a significant impact on both the theoretical understanding and practical application of data-dependent hypothesis sets.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel approach to deriving uniform generalization bounds for data-dependent hypothesis sets using PAC-Bayesian theory on random sets. By treating the hypothesis set as a random variable, the authors are able to obtain tighter and more informative bounds that account for the data-dependent nature of the hypothesis set.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their framework on several specific machine learning problems, including learning to optimize PAC-Bayesian guarantees, deriving better than KL PAC-Bayes bounds, and obtaining data-driven performance guarantees for classical and learned optimizers. This work represents an important contribution to the field of machine learning generalization theory and has the potential to significantly impact both the theoretical understanding and practical application of data-dependent hypothesis sets.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🐍
Data-dependent Generalization Bounds via Variable-Size Compressibility
Milad Sefidgaran, Abdellatif Zaidi
0
0
In this paper, we establish novel data-dependent upper bounds on the generalization error through the lens of a variable-size compressibility framework that we introduce newly here. In this framework, the generalization error of an algorithm is linked to a variable-size 'compression rate' of its input data. This is shown to yield bounds that depend on the empirical measure of the given input data at hand, rather than its unknown distribution. Our new generalization bounds that we establish are tail bounds, tail bounds on the expectation, and in-expectations bounds. Moreover, it is shown that our framework also allows to derive general bounds on any function of the input data and output hypothesis random variables. In particular, these general bounds are shown to subsume and possibly improve over several existing PAC-Bayes and data-dependent intrinsic dimension-based bounds that are recovered as special cases, thus unveiling a unifying character of our approach. For instance, a new data-dependent intrinsic dimension-based bound is established, which connects the generalization error to the optimization trajectories and reveals various interesting connections with the rate-distortion dimension of a process, the R'enyi information dimension of a process, and the metric mean dimension.
6/12/2024
🔄
More PAC-Bayes bounds: From bounded losses, to losses with general tail behaviors, to anytime validity
Borja Rodr'iguez-G'alvez, Ragnar Thobaben, Mikael Skoglund
0
0
In this paper, we present new high-probability PAC-Bayes bounds for different types of losses. Firstly, for losses with a bounded range, we recover a strengthened version of Catoni's bound that holds uniformly for all parameter values. This leads to new fast-rate and mixed-rate bounds that are interpretable and tighter than previous bounds in the literature. In particular, the fast-rate bound is equivalent to the Seeger--Langford bound. Secondly, for losses with more general tail behaviors, we introduce two new parameter-free bounds: a PAC-Bayes Chernoff analogue when the loss' cumulative generating function is bounded, and a bound when the loss' second moment is bounded. These two bounds are obtained using a new technique based on a discretization of the space of possible events for the ``in probability'' parameter optimization problem. This technique is both simpler and more general than previous approaches optimizing over a grid on the parameters' space. Finally, using a simple technique that is applicable to any existing bound, we extend all previous results to anytime-valid bounds.
6/5/2024
👨🏫
Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for Transductive Learning and its Applications
Huayi Tang, Yong Liu
0
0
We develop generalization bounds for transductive learning algorithms in the context of information theory and PAC-Bayesian theory, covering both the random sampling setting and the random splitting setting. We show that the transductive generalization gap can be bounded by the mutual information between training labels selection and the hypothesis. By introducing the concept of transductive supersamples, we translate results depicted by various information measures from the inductive learning setting to the transductive learning setting. We further establish PAC-Bayesian bounds with weaker assumptions on the loss function and numbers of training and test data points. Finally, we present the upper bounds for adaptive optimization algorithms and demonstrate the applications of results on semi-supervised learning and graph learning scenarios. Our theoretic results are validated on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
6/11/2024
PAC-Chernoff Bounds: Understanding Generalization in the Interpolation Regime
Andr'es R. Masegosa, Luis A. Ortega
0
0
This paper introduces a distribution-dependent PAC-Chernoff bound that exhibits perfect tightness for interpolators, even within over-parameterized model classes. This bound, which relies on basic principles of Large Deviation Theory, defines a natural measure of the smoothness of a model, characterized by simple real-valued functions. Building upon this bound and the new concept of smoothness, we present an unified theoretical framework revealing why certain interpolators show an exceptional generalization, while others falter. We theoretically show how a wide spectrum of modern learning methodologies, encompassing techniques such as $ell_2$-norm, distance-from-initialization and input-gradient regularization, in combination with data augmentation, invariant architectures, and over-parameterization, collectively guide the optimizer toward smoother interpolators, which, according to our theoretical framework, are the ones exhibiting superior generalization performance. This study shows that distribution-dependent bounds serve as a powerful tool to understand the complex dynamics behind the generalization capabilities of over-parameterized interpolators.
4/30/2024