Characterizing Large Language Model Geometry Helps Solve Toxicity Detection and Generation

Read original: arXiv:2312.01648 - Published 7/12/2024 by Randall Balestriero, Romain Cosentino, Sarath Shekkizhar
Total Score

0

💬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper aims to shed light on the inner mechanisms of Large Language Models (LLMs) through a geometric perspective.
  • The authors develop closed-form expressions for
    (i)
    the intrinsic dimension in which the Multi-Head Attention embeddings are constrained to exist, and
    (ii)
    the partition and per-region affine mappings of the feedforward (MLP) network of LLMs' layers.
  • The findings enable the design of novel solutions applicable to state-of-the-art LLMs, such as bypassing RLHF protection and extracting interpretable geometrical features for tasks like toxicity detection.

Plain English Explanation

Large Language Models (LLMs) are at the forefront of AI breakthroughs, but their inner workings are not well understood. This research takes a geometric perspective to shed light on how LLMs work internally.

Specifically, the researchers developed mathematical formulas to describe two key aspects of LLMs:

  1. The intrinsic dimension, or the minimum number of dimensions, that the text embeddings used in the Multi-Head Attention component of LLMs are constrained to.
  2. The partitioning and affine (linear) mappings used in the feedforward (MLP) part of LLM layers.

By understanding these geometric properties of LLMs, the researchers were able to bypass the RLHF protection that is typically used to control the outputs of these models. They also showed that the geometric features they extracted from LLMs could be used to help identify toxic content, even allowing the identification of different types of toxicity.

Overall, this research demonstrates how theoretical analysis can provide practical insights into the inner workings of large-scale AI systems like LLMs.

Technical Explanation

The authors of this paper aim to develop a geometric understanding of the internal representations and mechanisms of Large Language Models (LLMs). Specifically, they derive closed-form expressions for two key aspects of LLM architectures:

  1. Intrinsic Dimension of Multi-Head Attention Embeddings: The authors show that the text embeddings used in the Multi-Head Attention component of LLMs are constrained to exist in an intrinsic dimension that can be expressed mathematically. This intrinsic dimension is typically much lower than the full dimensionality of the embeddings.

  2. Feedforward Network Partitioning and Affine Mappings: The authors also derive the precise partitioning and per-region affine (linear) mappings used in the feedforward (MLP) part of LLM layers. This provides a detailed geometric characterization of this crucial component of the LLM architecture.

The researchers demonstrate how their theoretical findings enable the design of novel, principled solutions applicable to state-of-the-art LLMs. For example, they show that by controlling the intrinsic dimension of the embeddings through informed prompt manipulation, they can bypass the RLHF protection typically used to control LLM outputs.

Additionally, the authors derive interpretable geometric features that can be extracted from any (pre-trained) LLM, providing a rich abstract representation of the model's inputs. They show that these geometric features are sufficient to help solve toxicity detection tasks, and even allow the identification of various types of toxicity.

Critical Analysis

The research presented in this paper offers valuable insights into the internal representations and mechanisms of Large Language Models (LLMs), which are critical to the continued advancement of AI technology. By taking a geometric perspective, the authors have been able to derive precise, mathematically-grounded characterizations of key components of LLM architectures.

One notable strength of this work is the ability to leverage these theoretical findings to develop practical solutions, such as bypassing RLHF protection and extracting interpretable geometric features for downstream tasks. This demonstrates the power of combining theoretical analysis with applied problem-solving.

However, it is worth considering the limitations of the research. The analysis is focused on the specific architectural components examined (Multi-Head Attention and Feedforward Networks), and may not fully capture the complexity of LLMs, which often involve additional mechanisms like residual connections, layer normalization, and so on. Additionally, the research is primarily based on theoretical derivations, and may benefit from more extensive empirical validation across a broader range of LLM architectures and tasks.

Future research could explore ways to extend the geometric understanding to other components of LLMs, as well as investigate the implications of these findings for model interpretability, robustness, and generalization. Examining how the geometric properties of LLMs evolve during training and fine-tuning could also yield valuable insights.

Conclusion

This research paper presents a novel geometric perspective on understanding the inner workings of Large Language Models (LLMs), which are at the forefront of AI breakthroughs. By deriving closed-form expressions for the intrinsic dimension of Multi-Head Attention embeddings and the partitioning and affine mappings of Feedforward Networks, the authors have provided a more precise, mathematically-grounded characterization of key architectural components of LLMs.

The findings enable the development of innovative solutions, such as bypassing RLHF protection and extracting interpretable geometric features for downstream tasks like toxicity detection. This work demonstrates the power of combining theoretical analysis with practical problem-solving, and highlights the potential for further advancements in understanding and leveraging the inner mechanisms of large-scale AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Total Score

0

Characterizing Large Language Model Geometry Helps Solve Toxicity Detection and Generation

Randall Balestriero, Romain Cosentino, Sarath Shekkizhar

Large Language Models (LLMs) drive current AI breakthroughs despite very little being known about their internal representations. In this work, we propose to shed the light on LLMs inner mechanisms through the lens of geometry. In particular, we develop in closed form $(i)$ the intrinsic dimension in which the Multi-Head Attention embeddings are constrained to exist and $(ii)$ the partition and per-region affine mappings of the feedforward (MLP) network of LLMs' layers. Our theoretical findings further enable the design of novel principled solutions applicable to state-of-the-art LLMs. First, we show that, through our geometric understanding, we can bypass LLMs' RLHF protection by controlling the embedding's intrinsic dimension through informed prompt manipulation. Second, we derive interpretable geometrical features that can be extracted from any (pre-trained) LLM, providing a rich abstract representation of their inputs. We observe that these features are sufficient to help solve toxicity detection, and even allow the identification of various types of toxicity. Our results demonstrate how, even in large-scale regimes, exact theoretical results can answer practical questions in LLMs. Code: https://github.com/RandallBalestriero/SplineLLM

Read more

7/12/2024

Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Geometric Perspective
Total Score

144

Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Geometric Perspective

Romain Cosentino, Sarath Shekkizhar

The advancement of large language models (LLMs) for real-world applications hinges critically on enhancing their reasoning capabilities. In this work, we explore the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) through their geometrical understanding. We establish a connection between the expressive power of LLMs and the density of their self-attention graphs. Our analysis demonstrates that the density of these graphs defines the intrinsic dimension of the inputs to the MLP blocks. We demonstrate through theoretical analysis and toy examples that a higher intrinsic dimension implies a greater expressive capacity of the LLM. We further provide empirical evidence linking this geometric framework to recent advancements in methods aimed at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of LLMs.

Read more

7/4/2024

🤔

Total Score

0

Evaluating Spatial Understanding of Large Language Models

Yutaro Yamada, Yihan Bao, Andrew K. Lampinen, Jungo Kasai, Ilker Yildirim

Large language models (LLMs) show remarkable capabilities across a variety of tasks. Despite the models only seeing text in training, several recent studies suggest that LLM representations implicitly capture aspects of the underlying grounded concepts. Here, we explore LLM representations of a particularly salient kind of grounded knowledge -- spatial relationships. We design natural-language navigation tasks and evaluate the ability of LLMs, in particular GPT-3.5-turbo, GPT-4, and Llama2 series models, to represent and reason about spatial structures. These tasks reveal substantial variability in LLM performance across different spatial structures, including square, hexagonal, and triangular grids, rings, and trees. In extensive error analysis, we find that LLMs' mistakes reflect both spatial and non-spatial factors. These findings suggest that LLMs appear to capture certain aspects of spatial structure implicitly, but room for improvement remains.

Read more

4/16/2024

Interpreting and Improving Large Language Models in Arithmetic Calculation
Total Score

0

Interpreting and Improving Large Language Models in Arithmetic Calculation

Wei Zhang, Chaoqun Wan, Yonggang Zhang, Yiu-ming Cheung, Xinmei Tian, Xu Shen, Jieping Ye

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential across numerous applications and have shown an emergent ability to tackle complex reasoning tasks, such as mathematical computations. However, even for the simplest arithmetic calculations, the intrinsic mechanisms behind LLMs remain mysterious, making it challenging to ensure reliability. In this work, we delve into uncovering a specific mechanism by which LLMs execute calculations. Through comprehensive experiments, we find that LLMs frequently involve a small fraction (< 5%) of attention heads, which play a pivotal role in focusing on operands and operators during calculation processes. Subsequently, the information from these operands is processed through multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs), progressively leading to the final solution. These pivotal heads/MLPs, though identified on a specific dataset, exhibit transferability across different datasets and even distinct tasks. This insight prompted us to investigate the potential benefits of selectively fine-tuning these essential heads/MLPs to boost the LLMs' computational performance. We empirically find that such precise tuning can yield notable enhancements on mathematical prowess, without compromising the performance on non-mathematical tasks. Our work serves as a preliminary exploration into the arithmetic calculation abilities inherent in LLMs, laying a solid foundation to reveal more intricate mathematical tasks.

Read more

9/4/2024